This week, NASA shared more information about its planned moon base missions, Blue Origin’s New Glenn rocket exploded on the launchpad and the James Webb Space Telescope spotted a supermassive black hole that researchers say “may have formed within the first second after the big bang.” But first, we have updates on NASA’s X-59 quiet supersonic research plane and SpaceX’s Starship following last week’s test flight. Catch up here on this week’s science news.

Key test flights approach for NASA’s quiet supersonic plane

Over the last decade, NASA has been developing an aircraft that could one day reach supersonic speeds — or travel faster than the speed of sound — without producing the thunderous sonic booms typically associated with this feat. The plane, called the X-59, took its first ever flight back in October and has conducted several more in the months since. Now, NASA says it’s ready to go supersonic. The X-59 is scheduled to take its first supersonic flight, hitting over 630 mph at an altitude of about 43,000 feet, in early June, according to the space agency.

Then, in a followup “mission conditions” test, it will reach 925 mph (Mach 1.4) at about 55,000 feet. After that, it’ll go for its max speed: Mach 1.6, or 1,218 mph, at an altitude of 60,000 feet. NASA isn’t ready to show off the X-59’s quiet supersonic capabilities yet, though. For this phase of testing, NASA noted in a blog post, “The X-59 will be accompanied by a traditional supersonic chase plane, so any quiet thump it produces in the current phase of testing will be obscured by louder, traditional sonic booms from the chase.”

FAA grounds Starship after ‘mishap’

SpaceX’s Starship V3 launched for the first time last week in a test flight that achieved much of what the company set out to do. But, it wasn’t entirely without hiccups, and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has since ordered a pause on Starship flights while it investigates what went wrong and prevented the Super Heavy booster from making a soft splashdown as intended.

The issue arose after Starship separated from Super Heavy. “Following stage separation, the Super Heavy booster performed a directional flip maneuver and attempted its boostback burn,” SpaceX explained in a blog post following the launch. “It was unable to light all planned engines and performed a partial boostback burn that ended early. Super Heavy attempted to reignite its engines for the landing burn before experiencing a hard splashdown in the Gulf of America.” Starship went on to complete its journey and splashed down at the planned site in the Indian Ocean.

Liftoff of Starship! pic.twitter.com/LQLdjK5V6K

— SpaceX (@SpaceX) May 22, 2026

“After a thorough assessment of the operation, the FAA has determined the May 22 SpaceX Starship Flight 12 launch resulted in a mishap,” the agency said in a statement released this week. “The mishap involved the Super Heavy booster as it flew back to the Gulf of America after stage separation. There are no reports of public injury or damage to public property.” It added, “The FAA is requiring SpaceX to conduct a mishap investigation. The FAA will oversee the SpaceX-led investigation, be involved in every step of the process, and approve SpaceX’s final report, including any corrective actions.”

It’s not an uncommon move on the FAA’s part, and SpaceX has faced several such groundings over the years, many of which have been wrapped up fairly quickly. It likely won’t be very long before we see Starship back in action. “A return to flight of the Starship-Super Heavy vehicle is based on the FAA determining that any system, process, or procedure related to the mishap does not affect public safety,” the FAA noted in its statement.

The FAA grounded SpaceX competitor Blue Origin’s New Glenn rocket last month following its third mission, and it was just cleared earlier this week to resume flights. But, during a hotfire test on Friday, New Glenn exploded on the launch pad at Cape Canaveral. You can read more about that below.

Before you go, be sure to check out these stories too:

Twenty Snap alumni have launched Ghost Angels, an angel fund backing the next generation of social media and consumer AI startups. The fund has invested in at least five companies and plans to deploy remaining capital into at least 15 more within the next year. It declined to disclose total fund size.

Max Rivera, who led global partnerships at Snap, started the fund in 2025 to formalise an already growing alumni angel community. He currently works at Microsoft’s AI division. The roughly 20 founder members include Alexandra Levitt, who ran Snap’s corporate accelerator, and Will Wu, a founding member of Snap’s product and design team.

“We were intentional about the mix,” Rivera told TechCrunch. “That diversity of thought and experience is core to how we evaluate deals and support founders.” The membership includes former senior executives alongside people earlier in their careers, plus a small number who still work at Snap.

Ghost Angels invests at pre-seed to seed stage in AI startups building in social media and consumer. Rivera said the biggest trend he has noticed is that “social” and “media” have actually split into two distinct categories.

The 💜 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

What consumers know as social media today is a platform that relies on ads, with algorithms driving content and recommendations. “A lot of people are disillusioned with that relative to the original promise of connecting people in your life,” Rivera said. The next generation is moving away from generalised platforms and toward niche communities.

Ghost Angels is backing both sides of the split. On the social side, founders are applying AI to deliver on the original promise of human connection. On the media side, AI-native formats and generative creative tools are lowering the barrier to creation and distribution across music, gaming, sports, and fashion.

Rivera has noticed that today’s founders operate differently from when he joined Snap nearly a decade ago. Teams are leaner. Founders launch fast and iterate in public. Monetisation is diversifying beyond ads into subscriptions, token-based models, usage-based pricing, and outcome-based revenue.

Meta’s launch of Forum this week underscores how the incumbents are also sensing the split. Forum, a standalone app built from Facebook Groups, is designed to capture the community discussion use case that Reddit currently dominates. The fact that Meta is unbundling Groups into a separate app validates Ghost Angels’ thesis that niche community tools are the next category.

Molly DeWolf Swenson, co-founder and CEO of portfolio company Mozi, said the “Snap alumni network is full of brilliant, influential people who inherently understand the problem space I’m playing in.” The fund’s value proposition to founders is not just capital but domain expertise from people who helped build one of the defining social platforms of the last decade.

The broader startup landscape is rewarding AI-native approaches that build for new categories rather than optimising existing ones. Peec AI hit $10 million ARR in six months by building for generative engine optimisation, a category that barely existed before ChatGPT changed how people search. Ghost Angels is betting that the same dynamic applies to social: the platforms that win will be built for AI-native interaction, not retrofitted with AI features.

The Snap alumni network is one of the most active in consumer tech. Snapchat’s culture of experimentation, its bet on ephemeral content, its early investment in AR, and its willingness to build products that looked strange before they looked obvious produced a generation of product thinkers who now see the next cycle forming. Ghost Angels is the vehicle for putting that conviction to work.

With ever-increasing RAM and SSD price hikes dominating headlines – and even Apple worried about how it’ll impact prices, I’ve spotted big discounts on two MacBook Air laptops right now. Right now, you can save $200 on the 15-inch MacBook Air M5 with 16GB RAM, paying $1099. And for an even more portable pick, the 13-inch MacBook Air M4 gets a $300 discount, also now $1099, which comes with 24GB RAM and 512GB SSD.

● Get the MacBook Air 15-inch (M5) for $1099 (was $1299) at Amazon

● Get the MacBook Air 13-inch (M4) for $1099 (was $1399) at Best Buy

These deals caught my eye because not long ago, CEO Tim Cook warned that significant changes in the memory market could lead to an “increasing impact” on Apple’s products.

Who knows what means – but I suspect it could translate into a mix of product shortages in high-memory SKUs and higher base costs for MacBooks, making it an excellent time to upgrade. Both slimline laptops feature the vibrant and beautiful Liquid Retina display, and come in a range of colors to suit your style. I’ve also seen the MacBook Air (M5) with 24GB RAM and 1TB SSD down to $1499 (was $1699) at Amazon, if you want a performance boost.

Today’s best MacBook Air deals

A better deal than an entry-level MacBook Neo?

Is the MacBook Neo the better budget pick? That depends on your use, with the MacBook Air being the power powerful, portable option.

The Neo uses the considerably slower Apple A18 Pro CPU versus the M4 and M5 CPUs that higher-end MacBooks above offer.

The deals, as they stand, are unlikely to be beaten any time soon. For a larger display and a slightly beefier CPU, go with the M5 route. The more compact M4-based model’s additional 8GB of RAM is handy for memory-intensive workloads or even some light localized AI use cases.

Reviewing the MacBook Air (M4), we called it “best ultraportable”. Then the M5 model was released, and testing the 13-inch version, we hailed it as “still the best ultraportable” we’ve ever used.

“Unlimited” is a funny term. Unlimited cell phone plans often come with a long list of footnotes, terms, conditions, and exceptions. Mercifully, all of the Big Three cell companies have, by now, ditched throttling on their most expensive plans and include 5G data access in all their unlimited plans. Yet there are still many differences in the services they offer, and there are many differences between each carrier’s various tiers.

Cheaper “unlimited” tiers do offer unlimited talk and text. But they still have rules on how much data you get before they start throttling your speed, and some “unlimited” plans may throttle your data at any given time. It’s been a fixture of cell service plans for years.

It can be overwhelming, which is why I’ve broken it down. Below, I’ve highlighted what each of the three major carriers offers for “unlimited” individual and family plans to help you figure out which unlimited plan is best for you and your budget.

If you absolutely want to avoid slower data speeds at peak times, you’ll likely be choosing among the plans here. But look to our guide to the Best Prepaid Phone Plans for lower costs at the expense of some limitations. Also check out WIRED’s guides to the Best Android Phones, Best iPhones, and Best Cheap Phones.

Update February 2026: We updated prices and plans for all three major carriers. We added T-Mobile’s Essentials Saver Plan and rebranded Better Value Plan as well as AT&T’s rebranded Premium PL, Extra EL, Saver SL, and Value Plus VL plans.

The Best Unlimited Plan Right Now: T-Mobile Experience More/Better Value Plans

The Essentials plan (with autopay, taxes/fees not included): 1 Line for $60/month | 2 Lines $90 | 3 Lines $90 | 4 Lines $100 | 5 Lines $125.

Essentials Saver plan (with autopay, taxes/fees not included): 1 Line for $50/month | 2 Lines $80 | 3 Lines $140

Experience More/Better Value (with autopay, taxes/fees not included): 1 Line for $85/month | 2 Lines $140 | 3 Lines $140 | 4 Lines $170 | 5 Lines $200

Experience Beyond (with autopay, taxes/fees not included): 1 Line for $100/month | 2 Lines $170 | 3 Lines $170 | 4 Lines $215 | 5 Lines $260

T-Mobile has the best 5G coverage among the big three, the highest 5G speeds, the fastest downloads and the best overall reliability, according to analysis from OpenSignal and Ookla. The carrier also makes claims to winning on value, when you take into account perks that include entertainment bundles, airplane WiFi, and access to satellite data in emergencies.

T-Mobile has rebranded its unlimited offerings this year but still offers three (or kinda four) main unlimited talk and text plans: Essentials, Experience More, and Experience Beyond. Only the two Experience plans offer true unlimited 5G data without any throttling or deprioritizing (i.e., making your phone stand in line for data behind other, more important, phones during peak demand.)

For merely occasional jet-setters and those who want consistent phone upgrades, Experience More is the best affordable phone plan among all services. This adds WiFi during flights, 4K video, 60 gigs of high-speed mobile hot-spotting, a modicum of international data, a AA membership, free ad-supported Netflix, and cheap ($3) Apple TV. It’ll also let you upgrade your phone every two years so random children don’t make fun of your ancient iPhone at a rest stop (yes, this has happened to me.)

If you want 3 lines or more and you’re a new T-Mobile customer (or a 5-year T-Mobile customer), you have access to an even better deal. The limited-time-only Better Value plan is in fact., possibly the best deal in phonedom at the moment. For the same price as the 3-to-5 line Experience More plans, you add free ad-supported Hulu, access to the T-Satellite emergency network, unlimited mobile hot-spotting, 30 gigs of international data in hundreds of countries, plus additional watch and tablet lines for just $5 a line. With the exception of phone upgrades every two years instead on every year, the perks are actually better than T-Mobile’s highest price plan, at a much lower price. This sale price is also locked in for 5 years.

Snapchat is already packed with little symbols that can be weirdly hard to decode. You have streaks, emojis, badges, scores, Best Friends, and if you use Snapchat Plus, a tiny solar system that shows where you sit in someone’s closest-friends list.

The feature is called Friend Solar System, though most people just call it Snapchat Planets. It takes your position in a friend’s Snapchat orbit and turns it into a planet. From Mercury to Neptune, these celestial bodies signify how close a person is to you.

The important thing to know is that Snapchat Planets is a Snapchat Plus feature, and it is now off by default for first-time subscribers. To use it, you’ll need to subscribe to Snapchat Plus and manually turn on Friend Solar System from the Snapchat Plus feature management page. Snapchat says the feature can be toggled on or off at any time.

What are Snapchat Planets?

Snapchat Planets are part of Snapchat’s Friend Solar System feature. When it’s enabled, Snapchat turns a friend’s Best Friends list into a solar system, with that friend as the sun and you as one of the planets around them.

In simple terms, the planet shows where you rank in that friend’s Best Friends list. If you appear as Mercury, you’re their closest Snapchat friend. If you appear as Venus, you’re second. If you appear as Earth, you’re third, and so on.

You can find this by opening someone’s Friendship Profile and tapping the Best Friends or Friends badge with a gold ring. Snapchat says tapping that badge shows which planet you are in their Solar System.

The planet you see is about your place in their solar system. It does not automatically mean they have the same position as yours.

Snapchat Planets order and meaning

The Snapchat Planets order follows the real solar system, minus Pluto. Mercury is the closest planet, while Neptune is the farthest.

As such, the planets of your friends in order from closest to furthest are as follows:

• Mercury
• Venus
• Earth
• Mars
• Jupiter
• Saturn
• Uranus
• Neptune

And yes, Pluto gets left out again.

So, if you tap a badge on someone’s profile and see Earth, that means you are third in their Snapchat Friend Solar System. If you see Neptune, you are still in their top eight, just farther out in the ranking.

Best Friends vs Friends: What’s the difference?

Snapchat Planets can appear through two badges: Best Friends and Friends. A Best Friends badge means both of you are in each other’s closest-friends circle. In other words, you are in their top group, and they are in yours too. Meanwhile, a friend’s badge means you are in their Friend Solar System, but the relationship may not be mutual in the same way. You might be one of their top friends, even if they do not appear in the same position on your side.

Either way, tapping the badge is what reveals your planet, provided you have Snapchat Plus and the feature is turned on.

How to see your Snapchat Planet

To check your Snapchat Planet, follow these steps:

• Step 1: Open Snapchat.
• Step 2: Go to a friend’s Friendship Profile.
• Step 3: Look for a Best Friends or Friends badge with a gold ring around it.
• Step 4: Tap the badge.
• Step 5: Snapchat will show which planet you are in that friend’s Solar System.

If you do not see a badge, it usually means you either do not have Snapchat Plus, Friend Solar System is not enabled, or you are not in that person’s visible friend ranking.

How to turn on Snapchat Planets

Before you can use Snapchat Planets, you need Snapchat Plus. Pricing can vary by region and plan, so the safest way to check the current cost is inside the Snapchat app or through Snapchat’s subscription page. Snapchat also offers multiple Plus-related plans in some regions, and availability can vary.

Once you have Snapchat Plus, you may still need to turn on Friend Solar System manually.

• Step 1: Open Snapchat and go to your profile.
• Step 2: Tap your Snapchat Plus membership card or banner.
• Step 3: Open the Snapchat Plus feature management page.
• Step 4: Find Solar System or Friend Solar System.
• Step 5: Toggle it on.

The astounding growth of the hair-transplant industry in Turkey is not just a medical tourism success story; it’s also a tale of “hacked” medical equipment and algorithmic craftsmanship.

From a biological and evolutionary perspective, human hair is often viewed as an unremarkable mass of keratin that still plays some important functions—protecting our scalps from the sun’s harmful ultraviolet rays and regulating our body temperatures—but, for the most part, is no longer essential to our survival.

Yet, since ancient times, our subconscious perceptions of whether another person is healthy, young, or fertile have been based on visual cues such as skin radiance, the integrity of teeth, and hair density. Deep within our perceptions, hair has become one of the most powerful representations of our identity and self-confidence. It’s key to social communications and perceptions.

Today, the global hair-transplant and restoration industry, which has evolved around this deep psychological and evolutionary need, has grown into a massive, multibillion-dollar industry. Various research firms have estimated the total size of the global hair-transplant market as sitting somewhere between $7.33 billion and $11.61 billion in 2024. And those figures don’t include the underground economy. According to Ministry of Health data, 1.39 million people visited Turkey for medical treatments in 2025. The revenue generated from medical tourism is $3 billion in 2025 (roughly the same as in 2024). While there is no data about how many of these individuals came for hair transplants specifically, it is estimated that one-third of them visited for aesthetic treatments.

The role that hair transplantation plays in promoting Turkey is also noteworthy. For example, Turkish Airlines is occasionally referred to as “Turkish Hair Lines” or simply “Turkish Hair,” a nod to how significant hair transplants are when it comes to tourism to the country. (Similarly, Istanbul Airport has been jokingly referred to as “Istanbul Hairport.”)

It’s possible to see current examples of this in virtually every aspect of popular culture. Last March, a social media user shared a post titled “There won’t be a single bald Spaniard left in the world,” accompanied by an image of the famous soccer player Andrés Iniesta with long hair. It was in response to Spanish prime minister Pedro Sánchez’s stance against the war in Iran, a position that Turkey supports. The post went viral and made headlines on Spanish news channels. Similarly, American basketball star Shaquille O’Neal’s joke in Turkcell’s 5G ads—“I’m here for a hair transplant” while wearing a long curly wig and footage from Turkey’s seven regions—is likely to be talked about for a long time.

Turkey’s global success in hair transplantation and the dominant position the country has achieved are issues too complex to be explained solely by affordable labor, low costs, and favorable exchange rates. Instead it is the result of a bold and at times chaotic yet highly innovative evolution. This includes everything from the adaptation of motors designed for dental devices and sapphire blades used in eye surgery to Anatolia’s ancient craft culture and the master-apprentice relationship transferred to microsurgical techniques.

Makeup for the Modern Man

The development of the institutional infrastructure needed to meet this massive demand in Turkey dates back to the late 1990s. At a time when Turkey’s most famous figures were traveling to Europe for cosmetic surgeries, Dr. Mustafa Tuncer, who attended the Medica trade show in Düsseldorf in 1999, adopted a radical new vision. Tuncer laid the foundation for the Esteworld plastic and aesthetic surgery clinics when he announced, “If Turkey’s celebrities are going to Europe for cosmetic surgery, I will build the best hospital, hire the best doctors, and bring Europeans to Turkey.” Thus, Health Tourism 1.0 began, characterized by fully equipped institutions that combined plastic surgery and hair transplantation under one roof while raising standards to the highest level.

As medical director of the Esteworld Health Group and a member of the second generation of his family to share this vision, Dr. Burak Tuncer says that at the heart of this innovative evolution lies a philosophy with psychological and medical depth—one that does not view the matter merely as a cosmetic procedure. “Hair is a tissue that cannot be replaced or cloned,” he says, adding, “If roots are damaged during the hair-transplant process—whether while being extracted or implanted—we permanently lose that unique tissue. That is why we treat every single strand of hair with the same value and care as we would a kidney or a heart.”

London-based AI lab Inherent emerged from stealth on Wednesday with a $50 million seed round co-led by Index Ventures and Radical Ventures. Nvidia’s venture arm NVentures also participated, alongside Ex/Ante, Metaplanet, Macroscopic Ventures, and Mythos Ventures. It is among Europe’s largest AI stealth-to-launch rounds in 2026.

The founding team comes from DeepMind, Microsoft, and Reka AI. Tantum Collins and Edward Hughes previously collaborated on cooperative AI research at DeepMind. Louis Kirsch, another co-founder, also worked at DeepMind. Kaloyan Aleksiev came from Reka AI and Microsoft.

Collins has a policy background that most AI lab founders lack. He worked on AI policy at the Biden White House before co-founding Inherent. Matt Clifford, co-founder of Entrepreneurs First and the UK government’s former AI tsar, has joined as an adviser.

Inherent is building a platform called Faraday, named after the scientist. Its purpose is not to answer questions faster. It is to figure out which questions are worth asking in the first place.

“Most AI is built to answer questions. What it can’t do yet is figure out which questions are worth asking, the open-ended curiosity that produced penicillin, the microwave, the GPU,” said Danny Rimer, partner at Index Ventures. “That’s the gap Inherent is building into.”

Faraday pairs human researchers with AI agents that are designed to improve themselves iteratively on hard scientific problems. The company describes this as “AI-native science,” a paradigm it says will look and feel different from the scientific method as practised for the past 400 years.

Index Ventures framed the bet in those terms. “AI-native science will be messier, less legible, but capable of exceptional outcomes,” the firm wrote in a blog post announcing the investment. The conviction is that the most valuable application of frontier AI is not automating existing workflows but enabling discoveries that human researchers could not reach alone.

Inherent is structured as a public benefit corporation, a legal form that requires the company to consider its impact on society alongside shareholder returns. The structure is unusual for a venture-backed AI lab. It signals that the founders view governance as a competitive advantage rather than a constraint.

European AI startups are increasingly demonstrating that they can raise at scales previously reserved for Silicon Valley. Inherent’s $50 million seed sits alongside Peec AI’s $10 million ARR in six months, Lovable’s $100 million single-month revenue, and Mistral’s $300 million ARR. The gap between European and American AI funding is narrowing for companies building in categories where the technology is genuinely new.

Anthropic’s Glasswing project demonstrated that frontier AI can find vulnerabilities at a rate that outpaces human remediation. Inherent’s bet is that the same dynamic applies to scientific discovery: AI agents that can explore hypothesis spaces faster than human researchers can, while humans provide the judgment, taste, and ethical guardrails that agents cannot.

The team’s combination of DeepMind research credentials and White House policy experience gives it unusual positioning. It can credibly pitch to both the scientific establishment and the government institutions that fund basic research. Whether Faraday delivers on the promise of AI-native science will take years to evaluate. The $50 million buys the time to find out.

A Google security engineer was charged with insider trading after winning $1.2 million using confidential company data to place bets on the cryptocurrency-based Polymarket decentralized prediction market.

36-year-old Michele Spagnuolo, an Italian citizen residing in Switzerland and a Google employee since 2014, appeared on Wednesday in the Southern District of New York.

In parallel, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) filed a separate civil complaint the same day, seeking restitution, disgorgement, civil monetary penalties, and trading and registration bans.

According to the criminal complaint, throughout this scheme, Spagnuolo used his access to an internal software tool containing confidential “Year in Search” data (Google’s annual ranking of top trending search terms), which was marked with a “Google Confidential” banner in red text.

Beginning in October 2025, Spagnuolo allegedly used a Polymarket account under the alias “AlphaRaccoon” to bet on whether specific individuals would appear on Google’s top trending search lists. He also allegedly used confidential data from Google’s internal data tool and placed bets with near-perfect accuracy across approximately 25 unlikely outcomes, while risking roughly $2.75 million in total.

After Google publicly announced its Year in Search results on December 4, 2025, Spagnuolo’s AlphaRaccoon Polymarket account collected approximately $1.2 million in USDC.e winnings.

“From on or about December 4, 2025 through on or about December 10, 2025, when the Polymarket markets regarding Google’s Year in Search resolved, the software released approximately 3,914,362 million USDC.e to the AlphaRaccoon Polymarket account. On or about December 10, 2025, the AlphaRaccoon Polymarket account sent approximately 5.045 million USDC.e, to Wallet-0xAf6,” the complaint reads.

The FBI traced the AlphaRaccoon account to a payment processor account registered in Spagnuolo’s name and linked to an Italian government identification card. After online communities on Discord and X began speculating that AlphaRaccoon was a Google insider, the username was removed from the account, reverting it to an alphanumeric wallet address.

Prosecutors said that Spagnuolo subsequently moved the illegal proceeds through multiple cryptocurrency-swapping services, including one that removes wallet addresses from the blockchain.

“Today’s charges reinforce a decades-old message: corporate insiders cannot use confidential business information to turn a profit in our markets,” said U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton. “As alleged, Spagnuolo violated the duties he owed to his employer and used Google’s confidential business information to make more than $1.2 million in trading profits on Polymarket.”

“Employees who are entrusted with confidential business information cannot misappropriate that information for personal financial gain,” added CFTC Director of Enforcement David I. Miller.

Spagnuolo now faces a maximum of 10 years in prison on a commodities fraud count and 20 years each on wire fraud and money laundering counts.

Automated pentesting tools deliver real value, but they were built to answer one question: can an attacker move through the network? They were not built to test whether your controls block threats, your detection rules fire, or your cloud configs hold.

This guide covers the 6 surfaces you actually need to validate.

Download Now