Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Tech

ULTRASONE Launches Four Signature Headphones and the NAOS MICRO USB DAC, With S-Logic Still Doing Its Own Thing

Published

on

ULTRASONE has launched its largest product push to date, introducing four new wired headphones alongside the compact NAOS MICRO USB DAC. Rather than recycle one familiar platform with a new finish and some fresh adjectives, the German headphone maker is covering five distinct use cases: open-back listening, studio monitoring, compact audiophile listening, bass-heavy portable use, and better desktop or mobile source hardware.

The new lineup includes the Signature QUANTUM, Signature AERO, Signature MASTER PRO, Signature RAYVO, and NAOS MICRO. Preorders are open now, with deliveries expected to begin in September 2026. Wunderbar. The German national team probably wishes these had been available for the flight home after its rather early World Cup exit.

The Bavarian Headphone Brand That Put Space First

Founded in Bavaria in 1991, ULTRASONE has spent more than three decades building headphones for listeners who wanted something other than the familiar Sennheiser, Beyerdynamic, or AKG approach. The company established itself first in professional audio and DJ circles with its HFI and PRO ranges, before moving further into high-end consumer territory with its limited-edition Edition series.

The key to the brand’s identity has always been S-Logic. Rather than placing the driver directly in front of the ear canal, ULTRASONE positions it off-center so that sound reaches the outer ear first. The idea is to use the pinna, which helps people locate voices and instruments in real space, to create a broader and more speaker-like image inside a pair of headphones. It is not a subtle design choice, and neither are the results. Some listeners love the larger, more diffuse presentation; others find it unconventional. ULTRASONE has never seemed especially troubled by that.

Advertisement

The company’s reputation in high-end audio was cemented by models such as the Edition 9, Edition 8, Edition 10, and later Edition 15. These were not designed to disappear into the background. They combined premium materials, ambitious pricing, and a distinctly spatial sound that made them favorites among listeners looking for an alternative to the more conventional reference headphone hierarchy. The Edition 8, introduced in 2008, became one of the company’s best-known models by proving that a luxury closed-back headphone could work both at home and on the move without looking like studio equipment borrowed from 1987.

ULTRASONE also developed its ULE, or Ultra Low Emission, shielding system, which uses mu-metal protection around the drivers to reduce electromagnetic emissions. That feature has always been part engineering, part brand signature, but it underlined the company’s willingness to pursue headphone design from angles that other manufacturers generally ignored.

Signature QUANTUM Leads the New Lineup

ultrasone-signature-quantum-headphones
Ultrasone Signature Quantum

The Signature QUANTUM (€999) is the most clearly defined audiophile model in the group. It uses ULTRASONE’s 40mm GTC driver, previously found in the more expensive Edition 15 and Founders Series, with a gold and titanium-coated diaphragm, S-Logic5 spatial technology, and both single-ended and 4.4mm balanced LUMINOX cables in the box.

It is a closed-back, foldable design with 40-ohm impedance, 103dB sensitivity, and a claimed 6Hz–44kHz frequency response. At 364 grams without its cable, the QUANTUM is not pretending to be a featherweight travel headphone, but it is clearly intended to work beyond the listening room thanks to its passive isolation, aluminum hard case, and compact form factor.

ULTRASONE Signature QUANTUM Specs:

  • Headphone type: Wired, closed-back, foldable
  • Driver: 40mm GTC dynamic driver with gold-and-titanium-coated diaphragm
  • Technology: S-Logic5; Symmetrical DDF; Balanced Audio
  • Impedance: 40 ohms
  • Sensitivity: 103dB
  • Frequency response: 6Hz–44kHz
  • Weight: 364g, without cable
  • Ear pads/headband: Sheepskin-covered memory foam
  • Cables: 3m LUMINOX 3.5mm cable with screw-on 6.35mm adapter; 1.5m LUMINOX 4.4mm balanced cable
  • Other: Swivel ear cups; detachable screw-lock cable connectors; aluminum hard case

Open Back, Studio, and Bass Focused Alternatives

ultrasone-signature-aero-headphones
Ultrasone Signature AERO

The Signature AERO (€399) is the open-back option, built around a 45mm graphene driver and positioned for listeners who prioritize space, air, and detail with acoustic music, jazz, classical, and more carefully recorded pop. It looks like the model most likely to appeal to existing open-back headphone listeners who want a more spacious presentation without wandering into four-figure flagship territory.

ultrasone-signature-master-pro-headphones
Ultrasone Signature MASTER PRO

The Signature MASTER PRO (€799) takes the professional route. It features a newly developed 40mm titanium driver, LUMINOX internal wiring, and two high-end LUMINOX cables. ULTRASONE is pitching it toward engineers, producers, musicians, and studio owners who need a neutral and revealing tool for mixing, mastering, and critical listening. That is a crowded field, and it will have to earn its place against Beyerdynamic, Focal, Austrian Audio, Sennheiser, and the usual suspects who have been living in control rooms for decades.

ultrasone-signature-rayvo-headphones
Ultrasone Signature RAYVO

The Signature RAYVO (€299) is the least subtle entry of the group, which is probably the point. It combines aluminum ear cups, a foldable DJ-ready chassis, S-Logic5, balanced connectivity, and a more energetic tuning intended for bass-heavy genres including electronic music, hip-hop, techno, rock, and pop. ULTRASONE is not trying to sell this one as a mastering tool. Thank heaven.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Advertisement

NAOS MICRO Brings Dual DAC Hardware to the Mix

ultrasone-naos-micro
Ultrasone NAOS Micro USB DAC

The NAOS MICRO (€169) is an ultra-compact USB DAC with dual Cirrus Logic CS43131 converters, 3.5mm and 4.4mm headphone outputs, PCM support up to 32-bit/384kHz, and native DSD256 compatibility. ULTRASONE also describes it as providing dedicated headphone amplification, making it more than a basic USB-C adapter for listeners using laptops, tablets, or smartphones with wired headphones.

That could make it a logical companion for the new Signature lineup, particularly for anyone who wants balanced connectivity without dragging a desktop stack into a hotel room. ULTRASONE has not yet published detailed output-power specifications or U.S. pricing, however, so the real-world driving capability remains a question worth saving for an actual test.

ULTRASONE NAOS MICRO Specs:

  • Type: Compact USB DAC/headphone amplifier
  • DAC section: Dual Cirrus Logic CS43131 DAC chips
  • Outputs: 3.5mm single-ended and 4.4mm balanced headphone outputs
  • Format support: PCM up to 32-bit/384kHz; native DSD256
  • Construction: Aluminum-and-glass housing
  • Intended use: Smartphones, tablets, laptops, and compact hi-fi systems
  • Still unconfirmed: Price, output power into specific loads, gain settings, dimensions, weight, USB input type, and U.S. availability. 

The Bottom Line

ULTRASONE’s five-product launch is unusual because it is not built around one headphone platform dressed up for different audiences. The Signature RAYVO targets bass-heavy and DJ use, the open-back AERO focuses on spacious listening, the MASTER PRO goes after studio users, and the QUANTUM is the premium compact audiophile model. Across the range, ULTRASONE is leaning into its long-standing S-Logic spatial approach, balanced connectivity, and more specialized driver materials rather than chasing the same broad “reference” tuning with every model.

There is still plenty we do not know. The QUANTUM has the most complete specification sheet, but ULTRASONE has not yet published full technical data, U.S. pricing, or confirmed American dealer availability for the entire range. The NAOS MICRO is also intriguing, but without output-power figures it is impossible to say how it will stack up against the iFi GO bar, Questyle M15i, FiiO KA17, or Cayin RU7.

The headphone competition is equally specific. The AERO will face open-back models from Sennheiser, Meze, Beyerdynamic, and Austrian Audio; the MASTER PRO will have to contend with studio standards from Beyerdynamic, Focal, Shure, and Austrian Audio; and the QUANTUM enters a premium closed-back market dominated by Dan Clark Audio, Denon, Focal, Meze, and Audeze.

The differentiator is not merely a graphene or titanium driver. It is ULTRASONE’s attempt to offer a clearly different spatial presentation across multiple categories. Whether that translates into a real competitive advantage will depend on the tuning, comfort, durability, and how it performs.

Advertisement

Pricing & Availability

Preorders are available now directly from ULTRASONE, with global shipping and deliveries expected to begin in September 2026. U.S. pricing and retailer availability have not yet been announced.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Tech

Amazon Leo Is Ready to Begin Limited Internet Service Later This Year

Published

on

Amazon Leo is ready to begin limited internet service later this year, but it’s far behind Starlink — several thousand satellites behind.

Amazon launched 29 more satellites into low-Earth orbit on Thursday, bringing its total to 396 and positioning the company to begin offering internet service to a relatively small customer base. Leo business and product VP Chris Weber posted on X that the company will be able “to support continuous service across initial latitudes.”  

Still lots of work ahead — including raising all these new satellites to their assigned altitude — but we’ve completed enough launches for initial service this yr, and future missions just add coverage and capacity,” he added.

Advertisement

More from CNETBest Satellite Internet Providers for 2026

But Leo is starting a marathon that Starlink began in 2019 with its first launch. Trillionaire Elon Musk’s company has about 10,000 satellites in orbit and offers internet coverage to more than 150 countries. Starlink also either has or will have internet service on more than 200 airlines, including United Airlines, Air France, Alaska Airlines and British Airways.

In comparison Leo will only have limited service available to US customers later this year — coverage and price to be determined later — and is contracted by two airlines, JetBlue Airways in 2027 and Delta Air Lines in 2028. It will take several years and thousands more satellites launched for Leo to be able to offer widespread coverage in the US and elsewhere.

Of course, underestimate Jeff Bezos and his ability to compete and dominate at your peril.

Advertisement

Satellite internet is a big pie. Grand View Research estimates that the market will grow at a 15% rate from now until 2033, from $13.3 billion in 2026 to $35.7 billion by 2033. 

Hans Geerdes, a strategist at R&D firm CableLabs, said Starlink and its rivals pose a major threat to fixed internet service providers such as Xfinity, Verizon Home Internet and T-Mobile 5G Home Internet. “I think every fixed broadband operator should be very worried,” Geerdes said earlier this year. “It’s basically the second coming of fixed wireless, but at much better economics and with very, very aggressive competitive behavior.”

Leo eyes faster satellite deployment

Thursday’s Leo launch was the last of eight with its Atlas V rocket, which had a 100% success rate. Leo will conduct future launches with its heavier Vulcan rocket, which can carry more satellites at a faster deployment rate.

Melissa Wuerl, director of launch systems for Leo, said in a statement that the company has “hundreds of flight-ready satellites standing by” at Cape Canaveral in Florida. The company reportedly has nearly 100 launches scheduled at a cost of $82 billion. The goal is to have 7,727 satellites up by 2035.

Advertisement

Leo and Starlink’s satellites operate roughly 350 to 500 miles above the Earth’s surface, in the region known as low earth orbit (hence Amazon’s name for them, taken from the acronym LEO). This lower altitude allows satellites to deliver faster internet speed and also keeps it more affordable to install satellites into orbit.

Amazon is also hoping to capture a large share of the direct-to-device internet market. Direct-to-device internet basically means that a person’s cell phone or other device connects directly to a satellite. Key to that strategy was the company’s $11.6 billion purchase in April of Globalstar, whose low-earth-orbit satellites provide coverage in over 120 countries.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Building A Wireless Fingerprint Authorization Device

Published

on

Once upon a time, there was a bit of a fad for fingerprint authentication in laptops and desktop computers. It has long since faded, but [superdog] wanted just such a device for Linux and Mac machines. Thus, it was time to build one.

[superdog] designed the device, nicknamed immurok, as a tool for people who use external keyboards, and do lots of terminal work on Mac and Linux machines. Repeat password requests can interrupt one’s flow when hustling at the keys, so immurok was designed to ease this pain.

The device is based on a WCH CH592F microcontroller, which comes with Bluetooth connectivity out of the box. This allows immurok to connect wirelessly to the machine of your choice, advertising itself as a standard Bluetooth HID keyboard device. Fingerprint-wise, scanning is done with an R559S capacitive sensor, which verifies the match locally so there’s no transmitting biometric data anywhere. On the computer side, Linux is setup to use a CLI/TUI app plus PAM integration to handle authorization for system logins and sudo in the terminal. On the Mac platform, it’s used with a menu bar app, with PAM integration for admin prompts. There’s also a separate helper path for using it with the lock screen.

Advertisement

If you’re sick of entering your password all the time and wish unlocking your PC was more like unlocking your phone, this might be the project for you. We’ve seen similar projects before, too. If you’re whipping up fun gear for biometric auth, don’t hesitate to let us know on the tipsline.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Alibaba To Ban Claude Code In Workplace Over Alleged Backdoor Risks

Published

on

Alibaba has reportedly banned employees from using Anthropic’s Claude Code and directed them to its own Qoder platform amid a growing dispute over features that can help identify China-linked users. Reuters reports: The ban is part of a deepening spat between the two companies after Anthropic accused Alibaba of illicitly extracting its Claude AI model capabilities — a dispute that highlights the frantic race between the U.S. and China to take the lead in artificial intelligence. […] Anthropic said last month that it had suffered a strike by Alibaba, which it described as a “distillation” effort that involves training a less capable model on the outputs of a stronger one. The distillation helps accelerate China’s ability to reach Anthropic’s advanced Mythos Preview capabilities, it said in a letter seen by Reuters that was sent to two U.S. senators.

Alibaba’s ban comes just days after developers said Claude Code contained mechanisms that inspected user environments, including timezone and proxy-related information, and inserted subtle markers into prompts sent to Anthropic’s servers. An Anthropic employee wrote on Tuesday on X that the feature was “an experiment we launched in March” intended to prevent account abuse by unauthorized resellers and protect against model distillation. The person who spoke to Reuters about Alibaba’s ban said that Anthropic’s restrictions targeting China were difficult to enforce on individual users who can deploy servers in the United States and make traffic appear as if it originated there. But companies were more aware of legal and compliance risks, the person added.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

PC makers are chasing ‘creatives’. But who are they?

Published

on

Predator. Omen. Legion, Asus. Imposing gaming PC sub-brands signal the power that elevates them over web-and-Word workhorses. But even before AI model training became the new killer app, gaming wasn’t the only application where performance, even GPU performance, commanded a premium.

Workstations such as Lenovo’s ThinkPad P series and HP’s Z series, optimized for applications like advanced data science, computer-aided design and 3D model rendering, have long boasted specs similar to leading gaming PCs. However, they ship in more conservative exteriors, offer greater durability, and traverse different distribution channels en route to the desks of enterprise users.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Stop Making These 6 Common Rowing Machine Mistakes

Published

on

Rowing machines are a great way to get a low-impact cardio workout in. However, it’s easy to use this machine improperly, which is why it’s helpful to know what the right technique looks like. Whether you’re new to rowing machines or have little experience with them, it doesn’t hurt to learn how to row properly. It may take some practice, but once you nail the technique, you’ll understand why this is one of the best ways to do cardio in a short period.

We spoke with a personal trainer to understand the common mistakes people make with a rowing machine and how to fix them with simple cues.

1. You’re mainly using your arms instead of your legs 

Advertisement
Man sitting on rowing machine holding handle

Rowing is mainly a leg exercise and shouldn’t be dominated by the arms.

Anatoliy Cherkas/Shutterstock

One of the mistakes most people make when using a rowing machine is focusing too much on their arms rather than their legs. 

“Most people sit down and immediately pull with their biceps like it’s a cable row,” says Gerard Washack, personal trainer and owner of Strong Republic Personal Training. The problem with this approach is that rowing mainly requires leg strength. 

“About 60% of the power should come from your legs driving against the foot plate, 30% from the hips and back opening up and only 10% from the arms pulling the handle in at the very end,” Washack explains.

Advertisement

To help people improve their rowing technique, Washack says he changes how the handle is held: “I have people row with their hands off the handle and tuck the handle into your hip crease and just push with legs, then hips, then arms in that order.”

2. You’re not postured correctly

person slouching on rowing machine holding handles

Pay attention to your posture during your rowing setup.

18042011/Shutterstock

Poor posture is another mistake rowing machine users tend to make. If you have rounded shoulders and a hunched back, you’re not getting the most out of your rowing.  

Advertisement

“The spine has to stay long and the chest open during the whole move,” says Washack. He cues clients by telling them to imagine they’re sitting on a barstool with their chest up. 

Proper rowing should look long and smooth, with the legs pushing first. Then, the back opens, and the arms pull last. On the way back, the arms go away from the body first, the body hinges forward and then the knees bend last. By following these cues, it should feel like your legs are doing most of the work.

3. The damper is on the wrong setting

woman rowing and looking at screen

Focus less on the damper number and more on your effort.

Advertisement

Microgen/Shutterstock

The damper, the dial found on the side of a rowing machine, controls how much air flows into the fan. This is what you use to adjust the resistance of the rowing machine, and it influences how heavy the stroke feels. 

“Beginners usually move it to 10 because they think harder is better,” Washack explains, adding, “The damper isn’t a resistance setting like a weight stack; instead, it’s more like a gear on a bike.” Depending on your fitness level, he recommends the following:

  • Beginners should keep the damper settings between three and five.
  • Intermediate users who have their form down can set the damper between four and six.
  • Advanced rowers who focus on interval training or power can aim for seven or eight, and sometimes 10, on the damper. 

Ultimately, though, it’s more about the effort you put into the row. “Elite competitive rowers usually train at four or five,” Washack says, but they’re focusing on their output versus the number on the damper.  

4. Your rower lacks maintenance

People in a gym class on rowing machines

Be sure to keep your rowing machine clean so it lasts a long time.

Advertisement

PeopleImages/Shutterstock

The damper, the dial found on the side of a rowing machine, controls how much air flows into the fan. This is what you use to adjust the resistance of the rowing machine, and it influences how heavy the stroke feels. Although a rowing machine doesn’t require as much maintenance as other types of fitness equipment, you should still do your best to keep it clean and replace any worn-down parts. 

Washack recommends inspecting your rowing machine every month. “Inspect the chain or belt for wear, the seat rollers for dirt and the foot straps for fraying.” You should wipe down the seat and handle after every use, as sweat that falls onto the seat track can wear down the machine. 

Depending on the type of rower you own, you may need to focus on different parts for maintenance: 

Air rowers: If you own an air rower like the Concept2, these are the easiest rowing machines to take care of. The chain will need occasional oiling, and the flywheel cage (the enclosure where the fan sits) needs to be kept dust-free. 

Advertisement

Magnetic rowers: These are rowers that have the most electronic parts and mechanical complexity — similar to some of CNET’s favorite rowing machine picks. “The magnetic resistance system can wear or shift over time, and the cables connecting the resistance to the console can fray,” Washack explains. “I recommend checking those connections every couple of months.”

5. You’re using the rower for the wrong workouts

group of people rowing next to each other

Work smarter with a rowing machine by experimenting with intervals.

SeventyFour/Shutterstock

Unlike a treadmill or an exercise bike, where you can do long, steady workouts, a rowing machine is best used in short bursts. 

Advertisement

Washack likes prescribing intervals to clients who use the rowing machine. “Programs like four rounds of 500 meters with two minutes rest between are my go-to,” he says. “Another day, I do a longer, steady aerobic piece, 30 to 45 minutes at a conversational pace where your legs are working but you could still talk.” 

For clients looking to improve their power and speed, Washack focuses on eight rounds of 250 meters with a minute rest. 

6. It’s your primary workout

Woman in a green sports bra and black shorts sitting on rowing machine

Make sure you have a well-rounded workout routine that includes rowing as your preferred form of cardio.

Advertisement

Srdjan Randjelovic/Shutterstock

Unlike a treadmill or an exercise bike, where you can do long, steady workouts, a rowing machine is best used in short bursts. While rowing machines are great cardio machines, they shouldn’t be your main form of exercise. You should be following a strength-training program in addition to your rowing workouts. 

“Combine rowing with two days of traditional strength training, and you’ve got a complete program,” recommends Washack. 

Overall, finding a form of cardio you enjoy is important, since it will keep you consistent, and including strength training and mobility exercises will help you remain fit and strong.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

5 Cars That Prove 2017 Was The Best Year For Ford

Published

on





The American automotive industry has changed immensely over the last decade. Not only have we seen a shift away from sedans and small cars toward trucks and SUVs, but American automakers also embarked on an ambitious (and increasingly fruitless) move toward electric vehicles, which peaked in the early 2020s.

Ford has been part of that shift; it phased out some of its most established and once-beloved global car nameplates, filling that space in its lineup with additional truck and SUV models. The company did this while embarking on a seemingly unsuccessful pivot towards EVs, one that it will spend $19.5 billion to restructure.

Ford’s current lineup includes some impressive truck and SUV models like the Bronco, F-150 Raptor, and the new Maverick, but for driving enthusiasts and performance car fans, looking back at mid-2010s Ford and the excitement around it feels like a glimpse into another era. From inexpensive hot hatchbacks to race-winning supercars, we think 2017 was Ford at its modern peak. Below are five memorable Ford models that show just how great this year was — and also how much the company has changed since then.

Advertisement

Mustang Shelby GT350

In 2017, the fully redesigned S550-generation Ford Mustang had been on sale for two model years with a variety of powerplant options, and the GT350 represented the top end of the lineup. Taking its name from the legendary Shelby GT350 Mustangs of the 1960s, the GT350 and GT350R took the Mustang’s platform and elevated both its performance and its mechanical excitement to new levels.

Ford had already been building high-horsepower, supercharged Shelby Mustang variants for a while, but the GT350, which debuted for the 2016 model year, went in a totally different direction. It had no supercharger, and its 5.2-liter V8 was quite small compared to the competition — but that’s exactly what made the GT350 so special. 

Advertisement

The GT350’s naturally aspirated Voodoo V8 was unlike anything that came before it. It made 526 hp and used a flat-plane crankshaft, giving it a redline of over 8,000 rpm. It sounded as much like a Ferrari as it did your typical V8 Mustang, and, unlike newer performance variants of the Mustang, was only available with a six-speed manual. Subsequent Mustang models, including the supercharged Shelby GT500, would eclipse the GT350’s performance, but that hasn’t made the earlier, naturally aspirated models any less impressive. Today, when we look back on Ford of the mid-2010s, the Voodoo-powered GT350 stands out.

Advertisement

Ford Fiesta ST

One of the great things about Ford in the 2010s was that it didn’t limit its performance vehicles to its higher-priced models. Look no further than the Ford Fiesta ST, which was sold in the United States between the 2014 and 2019 model years. The Fiesta ST wasn’t the fastest ST model that Ford ever sold, but whatever it lacked in horsepower or raw lap times, it more than made up for with its fun factor. 

Its small size, punchy turbocharged engine, and manual gearbox earned the Fiesta ST praise from motoring journalists and drivers alike — both in the U.S. and globally. For the 2017 model year, the Fiesta ST had an affordable base price of just over $22,000, which, adjusted for inflation, is still less than $30,000. Unfortunately for hot hatchback fans, Ford dropped the Fiesta lineup, including the ST, when it cut its small car offerings in the late 2010s. 

Today, with all cars — and especially enthusiast cars — getting more and more expensive, the cheap Fiesta ST is a hero from a bygone era. Despite being one of the cheapest performance cars of its time, the Fiesta ST is among the mid-2010s Ford models most likely to become a classic. In fact, it may already be one.

Advertisement

Ford Focus RS

There have been many amazing hot hatchbacks over the years, but the North American market was often deprived of some of the greatest — except for one. In 2017, North American Ford dealers had not one, not two, but three different hot hatches for buyers to choose from. At the entry level was the subcompact Fiesta ST, followed by the larger and more powerful Focus ST — both front-wheel drive models. Then there was the ultra-hot Ford Focus RS, which arrived in America for the 2016 model year.

The Focus RS used a 2.3-liter turbocharged EcoBoost engine rated at 350 hp and 350 lb-ft of torque and, unlike its hot hatch siblings, sent its power to all four wheels. The Focus RS’ all-wheel-drive system was of the torque-vectoring variety, and the car even included a drift mode for tire-smoking oversteer shenanigans. The Focus RS was a fast, manic, rally-bred monster machine that was still practical enough to be a daily driver. As with the rest of Ford’s late-2010s hot hatchbacks, the Ken Block factor also helped turn the Focus RS into a generational icon.

While it’s not completely impossible that Ford would ever build a car like this again, we certainly can’t see the company building another gasoline-powered hot hatchback anytime soon. As of 2026, the closest thing you can get to a Focus RS in the Ford lineup would be the all-electric Mustang Mach-E Rally. 

Advertisement

Ford Fusion Sport

Aside from Ford’s 2017 lineup of brilliant muscle cars and turbocharged hot hatchbacks, the company also sold one of the greatest sleeper sedans of the modern era. That car was the Ford Fusion Sport, which was introduced for the 2017 model year. 

While many modern cars use the “Sport” branding lightly, the Fusion Sport introduced substantial mechanical upgrades to Ford’s popular midsize sedan. The highlights were a 325-hp twin-turbocharged 2.7-liter V6 engine, with an all-wheel-drive system to put that power down. To most eyes, it looked like any other Fusion model, but the Fusion Sport hit 60 mph in just over five seconds and ran the quarter-mile in the high 13s in Car and Driver’s hands. The Fusion Sport wasn’t just about straight-line speed, though; Ford also added adaptive dampers to improve its cornering.

While it may not have been as hard-edged or track-focused as Ford’s other performance offerings of the era, the Fusion Sport’s underappreciated status as a sleeper performance sedan is just another example of how deep Ford’s car lineup was at this time. Ford discontinued the Fusion Sport after the 2019 model year, with the rest of the Ford Fusion lineup being discontinued shortly after. 

Advertisement

Ford GT

Having a stout lineup of affordable and exciting performance cars earned Ford a lot of praise in the mid-2010s, but the car that sat atop the brand’s lineup, the Ford GT, will not be forgotten anytime soon. Though it left behind the supercharged V8 of its mid-2000s predecessor in favor of a twin-turbocharged V6, the 2010s Ford GT was, and still is, one of the fastest and most exotic production vehicles that Ford has ever built.

The 2010s Ford GT wasn’t just a car for wealthy collectors or track-day enthusiasts, either. It had genuine motorsport chops, and the race version of the GT made history by winning the 24 Hours of Le Mans in 2016. Not surprisingly, despite being less than 10 years old, Ford GTs from this era already sell for significantly more than they cost when new, and we don’t see those prices going down anytime soon.

Advertisement

Ford does, in a sense, have a modern equivalent to the GT in the form of the Mustang GTD, Ford’s 2020s supercar. Despite the GTD’s exotic performance hardware, though, it still uses both the name and general bones of the higher-volume Mustang. Meanwhile, the Ford GT, which ended production in 2022, was a bespoke halo car with racing pedigree to match.

Advertisement

Our methodology

With a company that’s been around as long as Ford, we could have chosen any number of years to discuss here. While Ford may have had better-selling or more influential vehicles in other years, we chose 2017 for its strong and diverse lineup of enthusiast offerings that showcased the company’s engineering prowess in a wide variety of ways. Additionally, unlike many of Ford’s earlier years, the excitement of the company’s mid-2010s lineup is recent enough to be vividly remembered by today’s enthusiasts, instead of just being something to be read about in history books and retrospectives.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

The Chevy Silverado EV is one of the best electric trucks ever built, so why is nobody buying it

Published

on

TL;DR

The Silverado EV offers 410 miles of range and strong reviews but sold only 14,000 units last year as price and towing anxiety keep buyers away.

General Motors sold roughly 14,000 Chevrolet Silverado EVs in the United States and Canada last year, according to GM Authority sales data. The petrol-powered Silverado moves more than ten times that volume in a single quarter. That gap, between what reviewers call one of the best electric trucks on the market and what buyers are actually willing to purchase, captures the central problem facing the American EV truck segment.

The numbers have only gotten worse. Silverado EV sales fell 41 percent year over year in the first quarter of 2026, and GM’s broader EV demand continued to decline into the second quarter. The automaker indefinitely suspended development of its next-generation full-size electric truck and SUV programme earlier this year, and took roughly eight billion dollars in EV-related charges during 2025, including writedowns tied to scrapped production plans and cancelled battery contracts.

On paper, the Silverado EV should be a compelling product. The LT Extended Range trim delivers an estimated 410 miles on a full charge from a 205 kilowatt-hour battery pack, the largest in any production pickup. It comes with GM’s Super Cruise hands-free driving system, a Google-powered infotainment setup, and a list price of roughly $71,000, only about $5,000 above the average transaction price for a full-size pickup, according to CEIC data cited by TechCrunch.

Advertisement

The 💜 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

The problem is what happens when the truck works like a truck. Towing cuts range by roughly 60 percent, which means a fully loaded Silverado EV might manage around 160 miles before needing a charger. According to Strategic Vision survey data, 75 percent of truck owners tow at most once a year, so for most buyers the penalty is tolerable, but for those who haul regularly it remains a dealbreaker.

Price is the other barrier. The $71,000 LT Extended Range is close to the petrol average, but GM also offers an LT Max Range that costs roughly $20,000 more and adds just 68 miles. At that level, the Silverado EV competes with luxury SUVs rather than work trucks, and the federal tax credit that once softened the blow has expired.

Advertisement

GM is betting that its new lithium-manganese-rich battery chemistry will cut at least $6,000 from battery costs while preserving most of the range, but LMR cells are not expected in trucks until 2028. The Ford F-150 Lightning faces the same cost and range dynamic, and Ram’s electric truck has been delayed repeatedly. The American pickup market generates hundreds of billions of dollars in revenue, but the electric versions remain a rounding error in the sales column, waiting for the cost curve to catch up with the engineering.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Pegasus creator’s Dream targets Latin America’s new right

Published

on

TL;DR

Dream, the Israeli cybersecurity startup co-founded by Pegasus creator Shalev Hulio, is expanding into Latin America. The company is targeting Trump-aligned governments in the region where cyber attacks are growing fastest and defences are weakest.

Dream, the Israeli AI cybersecurity startup that tripled its valuation to $3 billion this year, is expanding into Latin America. The company is targeting governments aligned with Washington in a region where cyber attacks are reportedly growing 25% annually and national defences rank among the weakest in the world.

Advertisement

The expansion is notable for what Dream’s co-founder built before. Shalev Hulio created NSO Group, the Israeli surveillance firm whose Pegasus spyware was used by governments to monitor journalists, activists, and political opponents across more than 50 countries.

Hulio founded Dream in January 2023, months after stepping down as NSO’s chief executive. The company describes itself as purely defensive, providing governments with AI-powered platforms to detect threats and patch vulnerabilities rather than the offensive surveillance tools that made Pegasus infamous.

The founders

Hulio’s co-founders are Sebastian Kurz, the former Austrian chancellor, and Gil Dolev, founder of intelligence-gathering firm Wayout Group. Kurz was convicted in February 2024 of making false statements to a parliamentary inquiry but acquitted on appeal in May 2025, with Vienna’s Higher Regional Court finding that the offence had not been fulfilled.

The 💜 of EU tech

Advertisement

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

Dream has more than 300 employees across offices in Tel Aviv, Vienna, and Abu Dhabi, with a Munich office planned. The company has built a sovereign data centre near Modiin, Israel, where it trains proprietary language models without relying on public cloud providers.

Why Latin America

Latin America is the world’s fastest-growing market for cyber attacks, with incidents rising roughly 25% annually according to industry estimates. A World Bank assessment scored the region’s countries an average of 10.2 out of 20 on cybersecurity preparedness, though the precise methodology and vintage of that figure could not be independently verified.

Costa Rica demonstrated the stakes in 2022. The Conti ransomware group hit roughly 30 government institutions, demanded $10 million in ransom, and forced President Rodrigo Chaves to declare a national emergency on 8 May, making Costa Rica the first country to take that step over a cyber attack.

Advertisement

Weeks later, the Hive group struck the country’s healthcare system, forcing hospitals to revert to pen and paper. The twin attacks crippled public services for months and showed that a mid-sized Latin American state could be paralysed by criminal hackers operating from another continent.

The political alignment

Dream’s push into the region coincides with a rightward shift that has brought several Israel-friendly leaders to power. Argentina’s Javier Milei has pitched his country as an AI hub and pledged to move its embassy to Jerusalem, aligning Buenos Aires closely with both Washington and Tel Aviv.

In Colombia, Abelardo De la Espriella won the presidential runoff on 21 June with 49.66% of the vote. He has pledged to restore diplomatic relations with Israel that his predecessor, Gustavo Petro, suspended in 2024 over the war in Gaza.

The alignment matters because Dream’s sales depend on government-to-government trust. Selling sovereign AI platforms to national security agencies requires a level of political intimacy that commercial cybersecurity contracts do not, and the company’s Israeli identity is an asset in capitals that have moved closer to Jerusalem.

Advertisement

The Pegasus question

Dream’s expansion into a region where surveillance technology has been exported to governments with poor human-rights records invites scrutiny. NSO Group was blacklisted by the US Commerce Department in November 2021 after Pegasus was found on the phones of journalists, dissidents, and at least one European Parliament member investigating spyware abuse.

Hulio has distanced himself from that legacy, resigning as NSO’s chief executive in August 2022 amid a corporate restructuring. Dream’s investors, led by Bicycle Capital and Group 11, have accepted his argument that defensive cybersecurity is a fundamentally different business from offensive surveillance.

Whether Latin American civil-society groups will draw the same distinction remains an open question. The region has a documented history of governments using surveillance tools against domestic opponents, and Dream’s founder built the most powerful one ever made.

The business case

Dream’s sales have reportedly exceeded $300 million, more than doubling over the past two years. The sovereign defence AI market is attracting new entrants, with startups like Rilian raising funding to deploy AI into air-gapped government environments, but Dream’s scale and government relationships give it a significant head start.

Advertisement

The company operates across three continents and counts sovereign clients in the Middle East among its largest accounts, though it does not publicly name its government customers. Latin America would add a fourth continent and a customer base whose cybersecurity budgets are growing from a very low base.

For Dream, the commercial logic is clear: sell to governments that need the technology, can afford it, and are politically willing to buy from an Israeli firm. For the region, the question is whether the man who built the world’s most notorious surveillance tool can be trusted to play defence.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

What should you know about the change in contractual retirement age?

Published

on

The change in policy will create new rights for employees looking to stay in their careers for longer, as well as bring in new legal and operational obligations for employers.

This past week (commencing 29 June), the Department of Enterprise, Tourism and Employment brought into effect the Employment (Contractual Retirement Ages) Act 2025, which introduces significant new rights for employees in Ireland and also places new legal restrictions and responsibilities on employers. 

The new rules mean that eligible employees, who wish to do so, can now choose to remain employed at their place of work for a period of time beyond their contractual retirement age, where that age is below the State Pension age of 66. 

The eligible employee can retire as scheduled if that is their choice and if they elect to stay on, they must formally notify their employer of their plans at least three to six months in advance.

Advertisement

The employer will be expected to consider any notification made under the new act and if they intend to compel retirement at a certain age, there are criteria to be met – namely, they have to respond to a notification within one month, clearly establish the basis for the decision and ensure that it is in line with the higher legal threshold set out in the act. 

In support of the new act, the Minister of State for Small Businesses, Retail and Employment Alan Dillon, TD has signed into law an updated Code of Practice on Longer Working, which was developed by the Workplace Relations Commission and is now also in full effect. 

Successful complaints around the new legislation brought by an employee through the Workplace Relations Commission could be awarded up to two years’ remuneration or €40,000, depending on which figure is higher.

On the employer’s side, a failure to provide a reasonable response to retirement notifications may constitute a criminal offence and is punishable by a Class A fine of up to €5,000 or imprisonment for up to 12 months. 

Advertisement

Golden years

Commenting on the recent change in policy, Ruadhri McGarry, an associate director at IT Search and a DevOps, cloud and cybersecurity specialist recruiter, explained that the right to request a later retirement date will also give older employees additional reassurances.

McGarry told SiliconRepublic.com, “It removes two specific worries. Financially, they can work at full pay for another year and continue pension contributions accordingly, and professionally, not everyone wants to retire – and so many people within the STEM community are deeply passionate about their work.”

It is an opportunity that he believes many people operating in the STEM space are going to take advantage of, particularly as he has noticed an increase in retirement-age professionals extending their tenure as they are still more than capable of producing exceptional work. In many cases they might pivot to consulting work to supplement income, but more often, in his opinion, it is about personal happiness and not feeling that they need to retire based on a calendar. 

He said, “We all need a sense of purpose and if any professional can contribute their decades of experience and drive, there is no real reason for them to stop.”

Advertisement

Turning challenge into opportunity

In the wake of the new rules, there may also be an opportunity for organisations to further capitalise on the expertise of employees reaching retirement age.

McGarry said, “From a big-picture perspective, that is an entire additional year, or more, that can add to the industrial body of knowledge.”

He added: “I fully expect employers to use this legislation and subsequent to maximise knowledge transfer across the generations, utilising senior employees to bring new focus to mentoring, project leadership and expertise retention. 

“Any legislative change that offers more choice to employees is always welcome, and those that choose to extend their careers for whatever reason will no doubt add a small but significant layer of experience to an entire sector.”

Advertisement

Addressing concerns that extending the tenure of older employees may limit opportunities for early-career starters or younger workers, McGarry is of the opinion that organisations will be clever in how they spend the remaining time with the established workforce. 

“I expect that when this change in legislation kicks in, firms will utilise that year to focus on knowledge transfer from technical staff approaching this new retirement date, giving a new focus for their final year,” he said.

“The limiting of opportunities for career starters would be minimal and more than offset by having additional time to learn from those at the end of their professional journey.”

Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Today’s NYT Strands Hints, Answer and Help for July 4 #853- CNET

Published

on

Looking for the most recent Strands answer? Click here for our daily Strands hints, as well as our daily answers and hints for The New York Times Mini Crossword, Wordle, Connections and Connections: Sports Edition puzzles.


Today’s NYT Strands puzzle is a fun one. It has a holiday topic, and the answer grid shows up in bright colors, which fits the theme. Some of the answers are difficult to unscramble, so if you need hints and answers, read on.

I go into depth about the rules for Strands in this story

Advertisement

If you’re looking for today’s Wordle, Connections and Mini Crossword answers, you can visit CNET’s NYT puzzle hints page.

Read more: NYT Connections Turns 1: These Are the 5 Toughest Puzzles So Far

Hint for today’s Strands puzzle

Today’s Strands theme is: Ooh!

Advertisement

If that doesn’t help you, here’s a clue: Happy 250th birthday!

Clue words to unlock in-game hints

Your goal is to find hidden words that fit the puzzle’s theme. If you’re stuck, find any words you can. Every time you find three words of four letters or more, Strands will reveal one of the theme words. These are the words I used to get those hints but any words of four or more letters that you find will work:

  • DARE, FARE, PARK, BROIL, ROIL, SPAR, COIL, BOIL, FAIL

Answers for today’s Strands puzzle

These are the answers that tie into the theme. The goal of the puzzle is to find them all, including the spangram, a theme word that reaches from one side of the puzzle to the other. When you have all of them (I originally thought there were always eight but learned that the number can vary), every letter on the board will be used. Here are the nonspangram answers:

  • BRIGHT, COLORFUL, DAZZLING, EXCITING, SPARKLING

Today’s Strands spangram

completed NYT Strands puzzle for July 4, 2026

The completed NYT Strands puzzle for July 4, 2026.

NYT/Screenshot by CNET

Today’s Strands spangram is FIREWORKS. To find it, look for the F that is four letters to the right on the bottom row, and wind up.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025