Crypto World
Aave Drops Chaos Labs as Risk Provider, Citing Deliberate Decision
Chaos Labs has parted ways with Aave after three years of serving as the crypto lending protocol’s primary risk service provider, citing a budget dispute and fundamental disagreements over how risk should be managed. The rupture signals a notable inflection point in DeFi risk governance as Aave advances its V4 migration and navigates ongoing governance tensions within its ecosystem.
Chaos founder Omer Goldberg announced the decision on X, stressing that the move was deliberate and not made in haste. He said Aave Labs was willing to raise its budget to $5 million, but that the engagement “no longer reflected how we believe risk should be managed.” Aave Labs CEO Stani Kulechov offered a different framing, describing Chaos’s departure as the result of a push by Chaos to become the sole risk provider and to replace other partner models. Aave’s stance, the two sides said, remains professional; Chaos did not depart on acrimony, but the parties simply could not reconcile their risk-management philosophies.
Key takeaways
- Chaos Labs exits after a three-year engagement as Aave’s main risk service provider, citing a budget dispute and diverging views on risk management.
- The split underscores tensions between a single-provider model and a two-layer risk framework that Aave maintains, with Chaos allegedly seeking to replace Chainlink’s oracles and other partners.
- Aave assures that the departure has not disrupted its protocol, smart contracts, or listings, while signaling it will continue working with LlamaRisk during the transition.
- The move comes amid broader governance frictions within Aave Labs over funding and revenue control, and just weeks after a notable risk incident fueled calls for stronger safeguards.
What triggered Chaos Labs’ departure from Aave
Chaos Labs has been a cornerstone of Aave’s risk infrastructure since November 2022, handling pricing, risk assessment, and related guardrails across Aave’s V2 and V3 markets. In that period, Aave’s total value locked expanded markedly, underscoring the centrality of robust risk tooling to the protocol’s growth. By late February, Aave had crossed a historic milestone in lending activity, with cumulative lending volume advancing past the trillion-dollar mark, a milestone the project highlighted as a first for the DeFi sector.
Goldberg framed the decision as one driven by a misalignment over risk management and the scope of Chaos’s duties. “This decision was not made in haste,” he stated in a post to X. “We worked in good faith with DAO contributors. Aave Labs was professional and supported increasing our budget to $5m to retain us. However, we are leaving because the engagement no longer reflects how we believe risk should be managed.”
Aave’s account of the dispute diverges on what Chaos was seeking. Stani Kulechov contended that Chaos sought to become the sole risk manager and to substitute Chaos’s price oracles for Chainlink—an approach that would have effectively sidelined other risk partners and compromised Aave’s established two-layer risk model. Chaos’s proposal, Kulechov suggested, would have forced Aave to abandon its multi-provider framework, a move the protocol did not accept. Chaos later indicated it was examining winding down its risk consultancy, even as Aave reportedly offered to double the compensation to keep Chaos onboard.
Beyond the personnel dynamics, the departure arrives at a moment of heightened sensitivity around risk in Aave’s community. The ecosystem has recently grappled with high-profile events that tested the resilience of its risk tools, including a $50 million loss traced to a user interacting with Aave’s interface on March 12. In response, Aave rolled out a shielded risk feature designed to deter high-risk trading behavior, signaling a public push to bolster user safeguards even as internal governance wrestles with funding and control questions.
Risk architecture at stake: Chaos’s demands vs. Aave’s model
At the heart of the disagreement is Aave’s two-layer economic risk model, which blends on-chain risk pricing with external risk data. Chaos has been integrated into the back end of that risk framework, providing pricing and risk management services that supported V2 and V3 liquidity and lending operations. The move toward a broader, multi-provider risk architecture—anchored by partners like Chainlink—was a core feature of Aave’s design philosophy as it expanded and upgraded to V4.
Goldberg argued that Chaos’s push to become the sole risk provider, coupled with a desire to substitute its price oracles for Chainlink’s, would have undermined the protocol’s diversification of risk inputs. Kulechov, conversely, stressed that Chaos’s demand would displace established partners and thrust Chaos into a governance role that Aave does not appear prepared to concede. The exchange underscores a broader tension in DeFi: how to balance centralized expertise with multi-source resilience in a rapidly evolving risk landscape.
In practical terms, the split leaves Aave poised to continue with LlamaRisk and other risk partners as it advances V4 and maintains its two-layer model. Chaos had suggested it could take on a more centralized risk-management posture, but Aave’s leadership signaled a preference for a governance-driven, multi-vendor approach, particularly as the platform expands its risk surface with new features and markets. The dispute also highlights a broader industry question: what responsibilities do risk managers owe when a protocol experiences a failure, and who bears the blame when risk controls falter?
Operational realities of the migration and broader implications
The timing of Chaos’s exit aligns with Aave’s ongoing transition from V3 toward V4, a process that executives warned could stretch over months or even years as liquidity and markets migrate and the new feature set is absorbed into existing ecosystems. Goldberg noted that ongoing operations would require maintaining both V3 and V4 during the migration window, a workload that can be substantial for any risk provider. He warned that without clear safety harbors or settled legal precedents, risk governance remains an area of ambiguity with real consequences when things go wrong.
Kulechov framed the disruption as manageable and non-disruptive to Aave’s immediate operations. He emphasized that Chaos’s departure did not affect Aave’s smart contracts, token listings, or network integrations, and that the protocol would continue collaboration with LlamaRisk to ensure a smooth transition. The episode sits against a backdrop of ongoing governance debates about funding and revenue allocation within Aave Labs, a debate that has punctuated discussions about how the DAO should remunerate development and risk oversight in a high-growth, capital-intensive ecosystem.
For users and investors watching the DeFi risk space, the episode underscores two distinct strands: the push for diversified risk inputs that mitigate single points of failure, and the practical realities of a multi-year migration that tests the stamina of risk tooling and governance structures. The fact that Aave achieved a meaningful lending-volume milestone while navigating this internal shift demonstrates the resilience of its ecosystem, but it also raises questions about the pace of migration and the potential for further shuffles among risk partners as V4 scales.
Cointelegraph’s coverage of related risk and governance developments provides broader context for these tensions. For instance, Aave’s response to the March incident and the subsequent shield feature was part of a wider market emphasis on user protection and risk-aware design. The departure also sits within the wider narrative of DeFi risk management evolving from boutique, single-provider arrangements toward resilient, multi-provider ecosystems that can weather shocks and governance disputes alike.
As Aave moves forward, the roadmap will hinge on how smoothly LlamaRisk can integrate and how quickly the V4 platform absorbs legacy markets and liquidity from V3. Chaos’s exit, while financially notable—the firm had been engaged at a $5 million level—illustrates the bargaining power that risk providers can wield in a high-stakes DeFi environment and the lengthier arc of governance negotiations that can accompany critical infrastructure changes.
For readers tracking the real-world implications, the key questions are clear: will Aave maintain a diversified, resilient risk framework as V4 expands? How quickly will the migration reduce the operational overlap between V3 and V4? And what lessons will the DeFi community draw about risk governance, budgeting, and partnerships from this high-profile split?
Investors and developers should watch for updates on Aave’s transition timeline, any new risk-partner arrangements, and how the community approaches risk coverage as V4 matures. The coming months will reveal whether the industry’s move toward multi-provider risk management proves more robust in practice, or if further shifts among top risk suppliers test the protocol’s continuity and user protection standards.
In the meantime, Aave’s leadership reiterated its commitment to maintaining its two-layer risk model and to working with partners—including LlamaRisk—to ensure a seamless transition. The episode also reinforces the broader industry takeaway that risk management in DeFi remains a live, evolving discipline—one where governance choices, partner ecosystems, and architectural design all shape the safety and reliability that users rely on every day.
Readers can follow ongoing developments as Aave navigates V4 integration and the evolving risk landscape, including how new safeguards and partner arrangements influence user experience, security, and the protocol’s long-term resilience.
Related coverage: Aave’s shield initiative after a high-profile loss, and discussions around risk provision and governance within DeFi ecosystems, offer useful context for evaluating how this split may influence future risk partnerships and platform upgrades. Aave Shield rollout and ongoing governance debates illuminate the environment in which Chaos and Aave operated.
Nvidia’s chip production is concentrated with Taiwanese contractor TSMC, increasing the company’s exposure to geopolitical risks and US export policy. Restrictions on shipments to China, including decisions related to H20-series chips, have led to significant financial adjustments, which the market estimates at several billion dollars, linked to inventory and expected demand.
At the same time, the revenue structure remains resilient — around 69% of income is generated in the US domestic market, where hyperscalers continue to expand purchases of data centre accelerators. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2026, revenue reached $68.1 billion, marking a 73% year-on-year increase, while full-year revenue totalled $215.9 billion (+65%).
In late March, the company announced an expansion of its strategic partnership with Marvell Technology, including a $2 billion investment and integration via the NVLink Fusion ecosystem, strengthening its position in the physical AI and robotics segments. At the same time, the broader macro backdrop remains subdued.
Technical Outlook
After reaching an all-time high near 210 in late October 2025, the stock entered a corrective downtrend. The correction bottomed at 165 on 30 March 2026, followed by a rebound, although prices remain around 177, showing no clear signs of a sustained recovery. The volume profile adds further clarity.
The highest concentration of trading activity during the observed period is located in the 181–183 range, where the Point of Control (POC) is positioned — this is the level where market participants were most active over several months, making it a key reference zone. Above current levels, the volume profile remains dense up to 189, which aligns with local highs from the second half of 2025 and acts as the nearest resistance.
The RSI stands at 49.37, remaining in neutral territory and offering no clear directional bias. The latest session’s volume, at 107.11 million, indicates continued market participation. However, it is worth noting that the most pronounced spikes in volume and volatility typically occur around earnings releases — and with the next report scheduled for May 2026, the stock may continue to consolidate within the current range.
Summary
NVIDIA remains in a prolonged consolidation phase, supported by strong operational performance but weighed by a subdued macro environment. The volume profile highlights significant activity above current price levels, while RSI remains neutral. Market participants appear to be assessing incoming signals without rushing to conclusions.
Buy and sell stocks of the world’s biggest publicly-listed companies with CFDs on FXOpen’s trading platform. Open your FXOpen account now or learn more about trading share CFDs with FXOpen.
This article represents the opinion of the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand only. It is not to be construed as an offer, solicitation, or recommendation with respect to products and services provided by the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand, nor is it to be considered financial advice.
Anthropic has struck a major infrastructure deal with Google and Broadcom to secure multi-gigawatt computing capacity, as demand for its Claude AI models continues to climb.
Summary
- Anthropic has secured access to roughly 3.5 gigawatts of TPU compute through an expanded partnership with Google and Broadcom.
- Most of the new infrastructure will be built in the United States.
- The AI firm’s Annualized revenue has surpassed $30 billion.
Details disclosed in a recent securities filing show the semiconductor firm will support future iterations of Google’s tensor processing units, with part of that capacity allocated to Anthropic. The arrangement is expected to unlock roughly 3.5 gigawatts of compute, with deployments set to begin scaling from 2027.
Anthropic said its annualized revenue has now crossed $30 billion, up sharply from around $9 billion at the end of last year. The company also reported that more than 1,000 enterprise customers are each spending over $1 million annually, a figure that has doubled within weeks.
“We are making our most significant compute commitment to date to keep pace with our unprecedented growth,” Anthropic’s chief financial officer Krishna Rao said, adding that the partnership would “build the capacity necessary to serve the exponential growth we have seen in our customer base.”
Most of the new infrastructure will be based in the United States, extending an earlier pledge to invest $50 billion into domestic compute capacity. The expansion also builds on Anthropic’s existing relationships with Google Cloud and Broadcom, following earlier TPU capacity announcements.
From Broadcom’s side, the deal adds to a growing pipeline of AI-linked revenue. CEO Hock Tan had previously confirmed that the company was already supplying around 1 gigawatt of compute for Anthropic through Google’s TPU systems, with demand expected to climb past 3 gigawatts in 2027.
For Broadcom, the latest deal adds to a quickly growing list of AI infrastructure partnerships. During the company’s March earnings call, Broadcom CEO Hock Tan said it was already supplying roughly 1 gigawatt of compute for Anthropic and added that this was expected to surpass 3 gigawatts by 2027.
Wall Street estimates suggest the partnership could translate into significant earnings. Analysts at Mizuho have projected that Broadcom may generate about $21 billion in AI-related revenue from Anthropic in 2026, potentially doubling to $42 billion the following year.
At the same time, competition across AI infrastructure remains intense. AI developers, including Anthropic and its peers, continue to rely on a mix of hardware platforms, including Nvidia GPUs, Google TPUs, and custom chips.
Broadcom is also working with OpenAI on separate silicon efforts, while cloud providers such as Amazon, Google, and Microsoft remain central to delivering that compute at scale.
Anthropic noted that its Claude models are now deployed across all three major cloud ecosystems, allowing workloads to be distributed depending on performance needs.
Crypto World
Planet Labs (PL) Stock Slides 2.6% Following CFO’s $7M Share Sale Despite Analyst Upgrades
Key Takeaways
- Planet Labs (PL) shares declined 2.6% during Monday’s session, reaching an intraday low of $34.21 before settling near $34.96.
- The company’s CFO and President, Ashley F. Johnson, offloaded 200,000 shares on April 2, generating approximately $7 million in proceeds.
- Fourth quarter fiscal 2026 revenue reached $86.82M—representing a 41.1% annual increase and exceeding analyst projections—though EPS significantly underperformed at ($0.48) versus the ($0.05) consensus.
- Multiple Wall Street firms increased their price targets, with Needham and Wedbush both moving to $40, while Citi upgraded to $35.
- The satellite imaging company also disclosed plans to redeem all outstanding public warrants on April 27, 2026, at a price of $0.01 per warrant.
Planet Labs (PL) experienced a 2.6% decline on Monday as market participants weighed a substantial insider transaction from a senior executive against the company’s latest quarterly performance.
Ashley F. Johnson, who serves as both CFO and President, divested 200,000 Class A shares on April 2, collecting approximately $7 million from the transaction. The sale occurred in two separate blocks—51,460 shares were sold at prices ranging from $34.57 to $34.94, while another 148,540 shares moved at prices between $34.585 and $35.87.
Additionally, on April 6, Johnson executed a transfer of 525,708 shares to The Johnson Joint Revocable Trust, an entity controlled by Johnson and her spouse as co-trustees.
Insider selling activity has been notably active in recent months. Throughout the previous quarter, company insiders disposed of a combined 218,566 shares valued at approximately $5.9 million. Board member Vijaya Gadde also participated in January by selling 20,000 shares.
Such consistent selling activity often triggers caution among investors—regardless of whether underlying business metrics are strengthening.
Top Line Strength, Bottom Line Weakness
Planet Labs delivered fourth quarter fiscal 2026 revenue of $86.82 million, comfortably surpassing the $78.17 million consensus forecast. This represents a robust 41.1% increase compared to the prior year period.
However, the earnings picture proved less encouraging. The company reported an EPS loss of ($0.48), substantially worse than the ($0.05) loss analysts had anticipated. Planet Labs continues to operate at a loss, reflected in a negative net margin of 80.22% and a negative return on equity of 69.61%.
Looking ahead, management issued Q1 fiscal 2027 revenue guidance approximately 5% above Street expectations—a factor that contributed to maintaining positive analyst sentiment despite the earnings shortfall.
Goldman Sachs increased its price objective to $18 while maintaining a Neutral stance. Needham elevated its target to $40, highlighting revenue and EPS beats of 11% and $0.02 respectively, and reaffirmed its Buy recommendation. Wedbush similarly raised its target from $30 to $40 with an Outperform rating. Citi upgraded its target from $30 to $35 while maintaining a Buy rating.
Technical indicators show the stock’s 50-day moving average positioned at $26.21, with the 200-day average at $19.64—both substantially below Monday’s closing price.
Satellite Deployments and AI Integration
From an operational standpoint, Planet Labs recently delivered three Pelican satellites to Vandenberg Space Force Base in California, preparing for an upcoming SpaceX rideshare launch. These satellites are equipped with NVIDIA’s Jetson AI platform, enabling onboard data processing capabilities.
Warrant Redemption Notice
The company has declared its intention to redeem all outstanding public warrants for Class A common stock on April 27, 2026, at a redemption price of $0.01 per warrant.
Trading volume on Monday registered approximately 12.5 million shares—roughly 11% below the average daily volume of 14.1 million.
Planet Labs currently maintains a market capitalization of $12.10 billion, operates with a debt-to-equity ratio of 2.37, and exhibits a beta of 1.83.
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
AI-powered quant trading bots lead crypto evolution in 2026, automating strategies and boosting efficiency.
Summary
- AI trading bots dominate 2026 crypto markets, automating strategies and driving passive income adoption
- BitsStrategy gains attention for high-frequency trading, using AI to capture rapid market fluctuations
- Automated quant trading tools rise as investors shift from manual trading to data-driven execution
The cryptocurrency market has continued to evolve in 2026, and AI-powered quant trading bots are now at the forefront of this transformation. These bots utilize cutting-edge artificial intelligence to analyze massive amounts of market data, execute trades with lightning speed, and maximize profit potential. For those looking to tap into crypto’s profit potential without the need for constant manual trading, these AI-driven bots can automate their trading strategies and generate passive income on their behalf.
In this article, we’ll highlight the 6 most profitable AI crypto quant trading bots of 2026, each offering innovative features and proven strategies that cater to a variety of trading needs.
Why turn to AI quant trading bots for profit?
AI trading bots bring several significant advantages to crypto traders:
- Data-Driven Precision: These bots make decisions based on vast amounts of real-time market data, ensuring that trades are backed by analysis rather than instinct.
- Round-the-Clock Trading: AI bots never rest, executing trades 24/7, and ensuring lucrative market movements are never missed out.
- Emotional Discipline: Bots make decisions based on logic and strategy, avoiding emotional biases that can often lead to costly trading mistakes.
- Ease of Use: With many bots requiring no technical skills, even beginners can take advantage of their profit-making potential.
Let’s explore the top 6 AI crypto quant trading bots that are delivering profitable results in 2026.
1. BitsStrategy: Mastering the art of high-frequency trading
Overview: BitsStrategy leads the pack with its specialized focus on high-frequency trading (HFT). Using AI, it can execute a large number of trades in a fraction of a second, capitalizing on minute price fluctuations for consistent profits.
Why it stands out:
- Optimized for high-frequency trades and rapid decision-making
- Continuously adapts to market conditions with real-time strategy adjustments
- Advanced risk management ensures minimal losses
Why choose BitsStrategy?
For traders who want to harness the power of high-frequency trading, BitsStrategy is unbeatable. Its speed and automation allow it to capitalize on even the smallest market movements, creating a reliable stream of income for users who don’t want to manually monitor every trade.
Click to visit and register to receive a free $10 real reward!
2. Pionex: Capitalizing on arbitrage opportunities
Overview: Pionex excels in arbitrage trading, where its AI bots track price differences between crypto exchanges and exploit these discrepancies for profit. This highly profitable strategy requires little input from the trader, making it perfect for those seeking a passive income stream.
Why it stands out:
- Built-in arbitrage bot that scans multiple exchanges for profitable gaps
- Seamless integration with crypto exchanges for instant trade execution
- Low fees and high liquidity ensure optimal profits
Why choose Pionex?
For those looking for a low-risk, high-return strategy, Pionex’s arbitrage trading bot allows them to take advantage of price differences across exchanges, offering a stable source of income with minimal involvement.
3. 3Commas: The portfolio powerhouse
Overview: 3Commas isn’t just a trading bot — it’s an entire portfolio management system that uses AI to manage multiple assets simultaneously. It combines powerful tools like Dollar-Cost Averaging (DCA) and Grid Trading to ensure consistent profits, even in volatile markets.
Why it stands out:
- Robust portfolio management tools that automatically balance investments
- DCA and Grid bots for steady, long-term profit generation
- Multi-exchange support and seamless integration across platforms
Why Choose 3Commas?
3Commas is the go-to platform for portfolio management, making it ideal for traders who want to automate their strategies across multiple exchanges while maintaining a diversified portfolio. The AI tools are designed for long-term success, ensuring a reliable source of passive income.
4. Cryptohopper: Tailoring trading strategy
Overview: Cryptohopper offers the ultimate in customizability. This platform allows users to create personalized trading strategies while still leveraging the power of AI. Whether they are a beginner or a pro, Cryptohopper adapts to their needs with its easy-to-use interface and powerful optimization tools.
Why it stands out:
- Customizable AI strategies for a personalized trading experience
- AI-powered optimization of existing strategies to improve performance
- Access to a strategy marketplace to purchase or sell pre-built strategies
Why choose cryptohopper?
If anyone wants to customize their trading strategy while benefiting from AI-powered execution, Cryptohopper provides the perfect blend of control and automation. It’s ideal for traders who want to experiment with their own strategies and leverage AI to maximize profits.
5. TradeSanta: Simplifying crypto trading for beginners
Overview: TradeSanta is designed for those who want simplicity in their trading experience. Its intuitive platform allows users to set up pre-defined strategies like Grid Trading and DCA, making it ideal for beginners who want to profit without getting into complex setups.
Why it stands out:
- Pre-set strategies such as Grid Trading and DCA for beginners
- Cloud-based interface, accessible from any device
- Minimal setup required with automated execution
Why choose TradeSanta?
TradeSanta is perfect for beginners who want to start trading without dealing with complicated configurations. With its easy-to-use interface and pre-set strategies, it makes earning passive income from crypto trading as simple as clicking a button.
6. Coinrule: No-code strategy building
Overview: Coinrule’s standout feature is its no-code strategy builder, allowing users to create personalized AI trading strategies without any technical expertise. The platform’s intuitive interface is accessible to both novice and experienced traders.
Why it stands out:
- No-code strategy builder allows for fully customized trading strategies
- Real-time AI-powered execution of personalized plans
- Backtesting features to test strategies before going live
Why choose Coinrule?
For those who want to create their own tailored trading strategies but don’t have coding skills, Coinrule makes it easy to build and automate their trading plans. It’s perfect for those who want to take a more hands-on approach to their crypto trading while benefiting from AI-powered execution.
Conclusion
These 6 most profitable AI crypto quant trading bots of 2026 offer a range of strategies, from high-frequency trading to arbitrage and portfolio management, ensuring that there is a solution for every type of trader. Whether someone is a seasoned professional or a beginner just starting out, these bots provide the tools and automation needed to profit from the dynamic crypto market.
- BitsStrategy offers high-frequency trading for rapid profits.
- Pionex specializes in arbitrage opportunities across exchanges.
- 3Commas provides a comprehensive portfolio management system.
- Cryptohopper allows for customizable AI strategies.
- TradeSanta simplifies trading for beginners.
- Coinrule enables personalized strategies without coding.
By leveraging these AI trading bots, anyone can automate their trading, reduce risk, and increase profitability in 2026’s fast-moving cryptocurrency market. Choose the bot that best fits a particular trading style and start profiting today!
Disclosure: This content is provided by a third party. Neither crypto.news nor the author of this article endorses any product mentioned on this page. Users should conduct their own research before taking any action related to the company.
US-listed spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have renewed the pace of inflows, recording their largest daily flows in weeks.
Spot Bitcoin (BTC) ETFs posted $471 million in inflows on Monday, the largest daily inflow since Feb. 25, when the funds attracted $507 million, according to SoSoValue.
The inflows came as the Bitcoin price briefly approached $70,000 before retreating below $69,000, according to CoinGecko data.
The volatility occurred amid ongoing geopolitical pressure as well as renewed concerns over Bitcoin’s quantum resistance, while the Crypto Fear & Greed Index remained in “Extreme Fear” at 13.
BlackRock’s IBIT leads the inflows at $182 million
BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) led the inflows with about $182 million, followed by the Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) with $147 million, according to Farside data.
The ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB) ranked third with nearly $119 million, marking its largest daily inflow since July 10, 2025.
On Monday, the blockchain analytics platform Arkham observed that ETF outflows slowed to a halt last week, with major issuers selling just about $16.6 million in Bitcoin. ARK Invest’s ARKB ETF purchased the most BTC, or $34 million in a week, it said.
Following the three trading sessions in April so far, US spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded about $307 million in net inflows, bringing total assets under management (AUM) back above $90 billion.
Related: Strategy adds $330M BTC as paper losses top $14.5B in Q1
In March, Bitcoin ETFs posted $1.3 billion in inflows, marking the first monthly gain after outflows of $1.61 billion in January and $207 million in February.
Ether ETFs record $120 million in inflows
US spot Ether (ETH) ETFs followed the recovery in sentiment on Monday, recording $120 million in inflows and offsetting $78 million in outflows from the prior two trading sessions.
Ether ETFs posted three consecutive months of losses, bringing total outflows for the period to about $770 million.
Other altcoin ETFs saw muted activity, with XRP (XRP) recording zero inflows on Monday, while Solana (SOL) ETFs posted about $247,000 in inflows.
A whale has transferred nearly $20 million worth of Bitcoin to Binance as the flagship crypto continues to struggle.
Summary
- A Bitcoin whale moved around 300 BTC to Binance, with roughly $20 million in value, while still holding about 200 BTC.
- The wallet built its position earlier in 2025 at an average price of $97,541, leaving it at a loss if the holder sells.
Data from Arkham Intelligence shows that an address labeled “bc1q…kp4n” sent around 300 BTC, valued at over $20 million, to a Binance deposit address on Tuesday. As of press time, the wallet still retains roughly 200 BTC, which is worth about $13.75 million based on prices at the time of writing.
The wallet appears relatively recent compared to others seen in recent months, where decade-old holdings have suddenly become active to execute similar transfers.
On-chain data indicates that the address accumulated around 513 BTC between January and March 2025. At the time, the stash was worth close to $50 million, pointing to an average acquisition price of roughly $97,541 per coin.
So far, it remains unclear whether the transfer was made with the intent to sell, but movements to exchanges are often linked to potential selling activity. Given that the wallet is currently sitting at a loss, with Bitcoin trading near $69,000, the move could be aimed at limiting further downside.
On the contrary, the transfer could simply be portfolio restructuring or internal fund management rather than an immediate sale.
However, if we look at recent whale activity, it would not come as a surprise if the holder is preparing to sell. Bitcoin is down more than 45% from its all-time high and has faced intense volatility in recent sessions.
Last month a dormant wallet moved 2,100 BTC, worth around $147.7 million, after more than 13 years of inactivity. In another case, roughly $33 million in Bitcoin was sent to Binance by a separate whale.
This is happening as Bitcoin price has remained under pressure due to bearish macro catalysts, particularly rising tensions between the U.S. and Iran. The conflict has pushed oil prices higher and aggravated inflation concerns in the U.S. and across global markets. As long as these tensions persist, large holders may be inclined to remain on the sidelines.
On the other hand, institutions and treasury firms like Strategy have continued buying the flagship crypto.
Key Takeaways
- Tim Cook offloaded $16.5M worth of Apple shares on April 2, selling 5,087 shares between $251.25 and $256.00 each
- Apple stock has declined approximately 4.6% in 2026, hovering near $255, marginally trailing the broader S&P 500
- The company unveiled the MacBook Neo on March 4 with a groundbreaking $599 price tag — every variant sold out within 16 days
- BofA projects the MacBook Neo addresses a $32B addressable market opportunity for 2026
- Analyst Wamsi Mohan from Bank of America maintains his Buy recommendation with a $320 target on Apple shares
Apple (AAPL) shares are hovering around $255, reflecting a year-to-date decline of approximately 4.6%.
The tech giant’s chief executive has been methodically reducing his holdings. Tim Cook divested $16.5 million in Apple shares during an April 2 transaction — unloading 5,087 shares at price points spanning $251.25 to $256.00. These transactions occurred through a predetermined Rule 10b5-1 arrangement, a mechanism specifically structured to eliminate concerns about insider trading.
Despite the recent sale, Cook maintains a substantial position with 3.28 million Apple shares, currently valued at approximately $848 million. While he’s trimming his stake, the CEO remains heavily invested in the company’s future.
Speculation about Cook’s potential departure from the CEO position recently surfaced. He addressed these rumors directly in a recent media appearance, clarifying that he’s made no public indication of leaving the position he’s occupied since taking over in 2011.
Apple’s sluggish 2026 performance isn’t happening in isolation. The entire Magnificent 7 cohort is experiencing negative returns this year. Microsoft has plummeted nearly 23%, Tesla is down 21.8%, Meta has declined 12.2%, and Amazon has fallen 7.8%. Against this backdrop, Apple’s 4.6% retreat appears relatively modest.
What distinguishes Apple from other tech behemoths isn’t aggressive AI infrastructure investment — it’s the strategic absence of it. While cloud providers are expected to deploy nearly $700 billion toward AI capabilities in 2025, Apple’s capital expenditure plans hover around $14 billion. The company is wagering that AI technology will become commoditized. Whether this thesis proves correct remains uncertain, but the approach maintains lean operational costs.
MacBook Neo Achieves Instant Sellout
The standout product launch this quarter is undoubtedly the MacBook Neo, introduced March 4 with a $599 price point. This represents Apple’s most affordable laptop offering in company history — priced lower than the Apple Watch Ultra 3. The device directly targets the $500–$1,000 notebook category, a segment where Apple previously maintained minimal presence with just 0.6% market penetration in 2025.
The launch timing appears strategic. Millions of aging PCs are incompatible with Windows 11 upgrades, generating a significant hardware replacement wave. Dell COO Jeffrey Clarke noted in late 2025 that approximately 500 million Windows 11-compatible PCs remain unupgraded — with an additional 500 million machines unable to support the operating system.
On March 20, Apple CEO Cook shared on X: “Mac just had its best launch week ever for first-time Mac customers.” Within the same timeframe, all eight MacBook Neo configurations sold out through Apple’s online store until the following month, as reported by 9to5Mac.
BofA Projects $32B Market Opportunity
Bank of America’s Wamsi Mohan conducted comprehensive analysis on the Neo’s revenue potential. His research team calculated a 2026 total addressable market of $32 billion, derived from 2025 notebook shipment volumes in the $300–$800 price range, adjusted downward by 10% for 2026, then multiplied by Apple’s competitive education average selling price of $499.
Assuming 10% market penetration and 19% operating margin performance, Mohan projects the Neo could contribute an additional $0.03 to earnings per share. While this appears modest in isolation, the strategic value lies in ecosystem expansion — Apple’s iPhone installed base encompasses roughly 1.5 billion devices compared to just 260 million Mac units. Transitioning iPhone users into Mac ownership strengthens overall platform engagement.
Mohan reaffirmed his Buy rating alongside a $320 price objective, calculated using a 32x multiple on his 2027 earnings forecast of $9.94 per share.
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
Little Pepe surpasses $28m in presale, advancing to Stage 13 as investor participation grows.
Summary
- Little Pepe presale surpasses $28m, entering Stage 13 as token price rises and supply nears sellout
- LILPEPE gains traction with Layer 2 utility, combining meme appeal with EVM-compatible infrastructure
- Strong presale demand pushes Little Pepe toward next price tier, highlighting early investor momentum
Little Pepe (LILPEPE) has now achieved yet another milestone in the continuation of the ongoing presale process, having now exceeded $28 million in overall funds raised. It has now moved into Stage 13 of the process, where the price of the token is now $0.0022 and is gaining more and more pace with the rising number of participants in the process.
In the latest updates, it has now raised $28,101,728 out of the $28,775,000 overall Stage 13 target, with 16,943,966,303 out of the 17,250,000,000 available for the process being sold out. This has now put more and more pressure on the late entrants in the process as the overall presale is now moving closer and closer to the next price level.
In the next stage, the price of the token is expected to rise to $0.0023, all in line with the pattern of appreciation that has been established. Since its listing in Stage 1 at a price of $0.001, this asset has appreciated by more than 120%, highlighting the value of early mover advantage.
Growing interest backed by utility and layer 2 infrastructure
Unlike most memecoins, which only rely on their virality, the Little Pepe coin seeks to position itself as a Layer 2 ecosystem with actual functionality. With the use of EVM-compatible architecture, the project seeks to provide ultra-fast, secure, and cheap transactions in the creation of a scalable environment.
The token operates with zero transaction tax, removing additional trading costs for users. Alongside this, staking mechanisms and NFT integrations are planned, adding further utility beyond simple trading activity.
With the aim of developing a wide ecosystem, including various applications and tools dedicated to memes, the community aspect will be merged with the practical use cases of the blockchain.
Exchange listings and expansion plans strengthen outlook
The team has set out their future plans, which include the listing on top centralized exchanges as well as DEX. This will not only improve the market once the presale is over but also meet the high market expectations set by the community, which is hoping to achieve a $1 billion market cap.
The project has also managed to gain attention by setting the aim to enter the top 100 on CoinMarketCap, further adding to the high growth prospects.
Community campaigns drive participation
Little Pepe’s rapid rise has been closely tied to strong community engagement. To celebrate its growth, the project has launched a $777,000 presale giveaway, where 10 winners will receive $77,000 worth of LILPEPE tokens each.
In order to participate in the campaign, the person has to make a minimum contribution of $100 in the presale and complete the social engagement task. This makes the platform more interactive and increases the person’s chances of winning with more entries.
In addition, a Mega Giveaway has been introduced for Stages 12 to 17. Both large contributors and randomly selected buyers are eligible to win rewards exceeding 15 ETH, adding another incentive layer for participants.
Momentum builds as presale nears next phase
With the number of tokens available dwindling in Stage 13 and the price set to rise soon, the current phase is one of the last chances for investors to get in before the price jumps again.
With the support of technical infrastructure, no-tax trades, and community-driven strength, the attention of the crypto world is still focused on Little Pepe. As the presale continues, the meme coin and Layer 2 elements are building a story that goes beyond the hype.
For more information, visit the official website, Telegram, and X.
Disclosure: This content is provided by a third party. Neither crypto.news nor the author of this article endorses any product mentioned on this page. Users should conduct their own research before taking any action related to the company.
Crypto World
Ackman’s Pershing Square Launches $64 Billion Takeover Bid for Universal Music Group (UMG)
Key Takeaways
- Pershing Square, led by Bill Ackman, has unveiled a non-binding $64 billion merger proposal with Universal Music Group through its SPARC Holdings vehicle.
- The bid prices UMG at €30.40 per share, representing a 78% premium over the previous closing price of €17.10.
- Universal Music Group shares surged approximately 13% following the announcement, while major shareholder Bollore Group climbed around 6%.
- The proposed merger would create “Nevada Corporation,” which would trade on the New York Stock Exchange.
- The deal structure includes Michael Ovitz, former Disney president, joining the board as chairman if the transaction proceeds.
Bill Ackman’s investment firm Pershing Square has unveiled a massive $64 billion takeover proposal for Universal Music Group, seeking to combine the Amsterdam-listed music powerhouse with its SPARC Holdings special purpose vehicle in a transaction that would relocate UMG to American markets.
The all-in proposal prices Universal Music Group at €30.40 per share, marking a substantial 78% premium above Monday’s closing price of €17.10. Market reaction was swift, with UMG shares climbing approximately 13% during early Tuesday sessions. Meanwhile, Bollore Group, which maintains the largest ownership position in UMG, experienced a stock increase of roughly 6%.
Universal Music Group has not yet issued a statement regarding the takeover approach.
The offer remains non-binding at this stage. The transaction framework calls for UMG shareholders to receive €9.4 billion in cash consideration alongside 0.77 shares of the newly formed Nevada Corporation for each UMG share owned.
Pershing intends to secure the cash component through multiple channels: SPARC’s rights holders, leveraged financing arrangements, and liquidating its ownership position in Spotify.
The resulting combined company — tentatively named Nevada Corporation — would obtain a primary listing on the New York Stock Exchange, fulfilling Ackman’s longstanding objective of establishing UMG’s presence in American capital markets.
Ackman’s Strategic Rationale Behind the Proposal
In correspondence addressed to Universal Music Group’s board of directors, Ackman praised management for their “excellent” stewardship of the company’s operations. However, he highlighted persistent underperformance in the stock price since UMG’s 2021 debut on the Amsterdam exchange as the fundamental challenge requiring action.
Ackman identified three primary concerns: market uncertainty surrounding Bollore Group’s 18% ownership stake, postponement of UMG’s previously planned American listing, and what he characterized as insufficient deployment of UMG’s financial resources.
Just last month, Universal Music Group abandoned a previous arrangement with Pershing regarding the pursuit of a U.S. stock exchange listing — a decision that seems to have catalyzed Tuesday’s formal merger proposition.
Pershing maintains a 4.7% ownership interest in UMG, positioning it as the fourth-largest institutional shareholder based on LSEG information.
Major Stakeholders Remain Silent
Bollore Group, controlling an 18% stake in Universal Music Group, has not issued any public statement. Vivendi, holding the second-largest ownership position, similarly declined to provide commentary. Tencent Holdings, ranked as UMG’s third-largest shareholder, has not responded to inquiries.
The stance of these major investors carries significant weight. A transaction of this magnitude requires substantial shareholder consensus to advance toward completion.
Michael Ovitz, renowned talent representative and former president of The Walt Disney Company, is designated to assume the role of board chairman at UMG should the merger receive approval.
Pershing Square has indicated it anticipates finalizing the transaction by the conclusion of 2026.
The debate over quantum threats to Bitcoin is shaping up as much a social challenge as a cryptographic one, according to Grayscale’s head of research. In response to a March 30 paper from Google researchers suggesting a quantum computer could crack Bitcoin’s cryptography with far less computing power than once thought, the industry is weighing not just the mathematics but the community’s ability to converge on a path forward.
Grayscale’s Zach Pandl argues that Bitcoin’s architecture may actually cushion it in the near term. He points to the network’s UTXO model, proof-of-work consensus, absence of native smart contracts, and certain address types that are not quantum-vulnerable. The real hurdle, Pandl says, is getting the Bitcoin community to agree on how to handle the looming post-quantum era, especially when it concerns dormant coins sitting in long-forgotten wallets.
Roughly 1.7 million BTC remain in early P2PK-style addresses, a tranche that includes the long-anticipated possibility that Satoshi’s own stash could be part of those holdings. Valued at around $68 billion at current prices, these coins represent a governance and risk-choreography challenge as much as a cryptographic one.
The Bitcoin community has three options
Pandl outlines three principal courses of action for coins whose private keys are lost or inaccessible: burn the coins, deliberately slow their movement by constraining the rate at which vulnerable addresses can spend, or take no action and leave the situation as is. He notes that all options are technically feasible, but the hard part is achieving consensus—a recurring theme in Bitcoin’s history of protocol debates, including controversies over data stored in blocks.
The social dimension of the decision is underscored by a recent flashpoint in the community: the Ordinals controversy of 2023, which inflamed debates over using block space to inscribe data such as text or images to satoshis. While the debate has cooled, the two sides remain far from unanimous on governance and protocol change.
“All are conceptually doable, but the challenge is reaching a decision, and the Bitcoin community has a history of contentious debates over protocol changes, including last year’s dispute around image data stored in blocks.”
That warning echoes a broader message: even as researchers discuss the urgency of upgrading cryptography, the path forward ultimately depends on communal agreement about how to treat long-dormant funds and how aggressively to pursue post-quantum protections.
No immediate threat, but a clear call to readiness
Pandl stresses that the time to begin migration toward post-quantum cryptography is now, even if the current threat is not imminent. The idea is to harden blockchains against future quantum attacks before they become critical, rather than scrambling after weaknesses become exploitable.
Industry momentum toward quantum readiness is not limited to Bitcoin. The Solana Foundation and the XRP Ledger have already begun experimenting with post-quantum cryptography, while the Ethereum Foundation published a dedicated post-quantum roadmap in February. These signals suggest a broader market push to standardize and deploy quantum-safe protections across networks, a shift readers should watch closely as governance and coordination across ecosystems mature.
“In our view, there is no security threat to public blockchains from quantum computers today.”
For investors and builders, the takeaway is to separate near-term risk from long-term planning. While the cryptographic landscape may not produce an urgent exploit in the immediate future, the world of post-quantum cryptography is moving forward, and the communities behind major networks are increasingly vocal about preparedness. Grayscale’s stance mirrors a growing consensus: the prudent course is to accelerate research, test implementations, and seek consensus on a governance path that preserves Bitcoin’s security model while guarding against quantum-era threats.
What to watch next
As research continues and other networks advance their quantum-resistant experiments, the crucial developments will be how the Bitcoin community negotiates dormant-key scenarios and whether a broadly accepted post-quantum standard gains traction. The coming months should reveal whether a practical, agreed-upon approach emerges for handling inaccessible coins and for upgrading cryptographic defenses before quantum-era risks become acute.
For now, the emphasis remains on preparedness rather than panic: accelerate post-quantum research, monitor governance dialogues, and observe how the broader ecosystem—spanning Solana, XRP Ledger, and Ethereum—moves toward standardized quantum resistance. The manner in which Bitcoin navigates these questions will shape how investors evaluate digital-asset safety in a world where quantum computers are increasingly plausible, but not yet compelling threats.
XRP WILL BE “VERY EXPENSIVE” ( JAPAN’S FINANCIAL GIANT JUST SENT ANOTHER SIGNAL)
Aaron Ramsey quits football with immediate effect
AI training is the real key to job creation, not mass unemployment
-
NewsBeat5 days agoSteven Gerrard disagrees with Gary Neville over ‘shock’ Chelsea and Arsenal claim | Football
-
Business4 days agoNo Jackpot Winner and $194 Million Prize Rolls Over
-
Fashion4 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Spanx – Corporette.com
-
Crypto World6 days agoGold Price Prediction: Worst Month in 17 Years fo Save Haven Rock
-
Business1 day agoThree Gulf funds agree to back Paramount’s $81 billion takeover of Warner, WSJ reports
-
Crypto World7 days ago
Dems press CFTC, ethics board on prediction-market insider trades
-
Sports3 days agoIndia men’s 4x400m and mixed 4x100m relay teams register big progress | Other Sports News
-
Business3 days agoExpert Picks for Every Need
-
Business5 days agoLogin and Checkout Issues Spark Merchant Frustration
-
Sports7 days agoTallest college basketball player ever, standing at 7-foot-9, entering transfer portal
-
Tech7 days agoHow to back up your iPhone & iPad to your Mac before something goes wrong
-
Crypto World6 days agoBitcoin enters the public bond market as Moody’s gives a first-of-its-kind crypto deal a rating
-
Crypto World6 days ago
Bitcoin stalls below key resistance as technical signals skew bearish
-
Tech5 days agoCommonwealth Fusion Systems leans on magnets for near-term revenue
-
Politics6 days agoStarmer’s centre has collapsed, and the left was right all along
-
Business2 days ago
No Jackpot Winner, Prize to Climb to $231 Million
-
Fashion7 days agoZara Turns Up the Heat With New Swimwear
-
Fashion7 days agoTuesday’s Workwear Report: Tavira Sculpt Stretch Crepe Trousers
-
Crypto World7 days ago
AI Memory Rout Wipes 9% Off Nvidia Stock: Chart Says More Pain Ahead
-
Crypto World6 days agoWhy It’s Partnering, Not Issuing
You must be logged in to post a comment Login