Djokovic is one win away from the standalone record of 25 grand slam singles titles and, at 38, is bidding to become the oldest grand slam champion in the Open era. At the other end of the scale, world No 1 Alcaraz can become the youngest man of all time to complete the career grand slam, at the age of 22.
Alcaraz and Djokovic have previously met in two grand slam finals, with Alcaraz beating him twice at Wimbledon. But Djokovic won an epic Olympics final in Paris around 18 months ago, before beating Alcaraz in last year’s Australian Open quarter-finals.
And after ending Jannik Sinner’s dominant run, as well as breaking the Sinner-Alcaraz duopoly of finals, no one will be counting Djokovic out this time, although both men will have to recover from marathon efforts in the semi-finals.
Advertisement
“I just hope that I’ll have enough gas to go toe to toe with him,” Djokovic said. “That’s my desire, and then let the gods decide the winner.”
Follow live updates from the Australian Open final, below
Carlos Alcaraz 0-0 Novak Djokovic*
Actually, the roof is only partially open, which should limit the points being overly disrupted by wind.
Advertisement
The Rod Laver Arena is cracking with anticipation. The roars from Djokovic’s fans are already febrile.
(AFP via Getty Images)
Jamie Braidwood1 February 2026 08:46
Carlos Alcaraz 0-0 Novak Djokovic*
Alcaraz wins the toss and elects to receive.
Advertisement
Alcaraz and Djokovic stop for the pre-match photo, before wishing the other good luck. And the roof is open on the Rod Laver Arena, in cold, windy conditions.
The final is being shown live on TNT Sports in the UK as well as online on Discovery+.
In the US, it will be shown live on ESPN and Tennis Channel.
(Getty Images)
Jamie Braidwood1 February 2026 08:41
Advertisement
Carlos Alcaraz v Novak Djokovic
Rafael Nadal takes his seat in the Rod Laver Arena as Carlos Alcaraz lines up behind Novak Djokovic in the tunnel.
Djokovic walks past his name before stepping out onto court, and the list of his 10 Australian Open titles.
Alcaraz is yet to win one, yet there is so much more history on the line for both players today.
Jamie Braidwood1 February 2026 08:38
Advertisement
Carlos Alcaraz v Novak Djokovic
Where has the Melbourne heat gone? It’s damp, blustery and looks very, very cold around the grounds outside the Rod Laver Arena.
But the roof, for now, is staying open.
Carlos Alcaraz and Novak Djokovic will be starting their walk-outs onto the court very shortly.
Advertisement
Jamie Braidwood1 February 2026 08:32
Nadal picks favourite for Alcaraz and Djokovic’s Australian Open final
Rafael Nadal has picked his favourite for the Australian Open final as he prepares to witness history in the match between compatriot Carlos Alcaraz and long-time rival Novak Djokovic.
Nadal, the two-time Australian Open winner and 22-time grand slam champion, will be court-side at the Rod Laver Arena to witness history on Sunday, returning to the tournament for the first time since his retirement from the sport in 2024.
Advertisement
“Carlos is from my country. I have a good relationship with him. We shared the Olympic Games together. We shared the Spanish team.
“If Novak wins, I will be happy for him because what he’s doing at this stage of his career is quite spectacular. He shows an amazing passion for the game.
“But if I have to support someone, I support Carlos.”
(AP)
Jamie Braidwood1 February 2026 08:29
Advertisement
Novak Djokovic is out to prove the doubters wrong
“I never stopped doubting. I never stopped believing in myself. There’s a lot of people that doubt me. I see there is a lot of experts all of a sudden that wanted to retire me or have retired me many times the last couple of years.
‘I want to thank them all, because they gave me strength. They gave me motivation to prove them wrong, which I have tonight. For me, it’s not a surprise, to be honest. I know what I’m capable of.”
Jamie Braidwood1 February 2026 08:22
Advertisement
How Carlos Alcaraz made history with Australian Open fightback
Carlos Alcaraz’s recovery made history, with the chance of another significant record to come as he chases a first Australian Open title. At 22, Alcaraz is the youngest man in the Open Era to reach the final at all four grand slam tournaments – ahead of Jim Courier, who achieved the feat in 1993.
Alcaraz also moves one win becoming the youngest man in history to complete the career grand slam – ahead of Don Budge, who achieved the feat in 1938. Rafael Nadal is the youngest player to complete the career grand slam in the Open era, and was 24 when he did so in 2010.
Jim Courier was courtside and interviewed Alcaraz after his latest epic, and pointed out the history he can create on Sunday. “Thank you for putting so much pressure on me right now,” Alcaraz laughed. “Kidding, kidding!
“I’m just really, really happy to have the chance to play my first final here in Melbourne. It’s something that I was pursuing a lot, chasing a lot, having the chance to fight for the title.”
Advertisement
Carlos Alcaraz celebrates his win over Alexander Zverev (Asanka Brendon Ratnayake/AP) (AP)
Jamie Braidwood1 February 2026 08:12
How will Novak Djokovic recover for the Australian Open final?
After playing for four hours and seven minutes in Friday’s semi-final win against Jannik Sinner, Djokovic said: “I don’t know. Let’s see. You know, it’s almost 3am… Yeah, let’s see. I cannot make any predictions right now. Definitely not going to train tomorrow, just going to use every hour I possibly can to recover. Hopefully get out on the finals day feeling somewhat refreshed.”
Djokovic reportedly did not go to bed until 6am on Saturday morning and did not report to the site yesterday.
(AFP via Getty Images)
Jamie Braidwood1 February 2026 08:02
Advertisement
Novak Djokovic v Carlos Alcaraz head-to-head
This will be the 10th tour-level match between Djokovic and Alcaraz and their sixth over best of five sets. Djokovic currently leads the head to head 5-4, but Alcaraz won their last meeting at the US Open semi-finals, winning in straight-sets.
Before then, Djokovic had won all three times they had met on a hard-court and Alcaraz’s previous two wins over Djokovic had come in the Wimbledon final, in 2023 and 2024. They have met at the Australian Open once before, with Djokovic winning in the quarter-finals last year.
(Getty Images)
Jamie Braidwood1 February 2026 07:50
What has Novak Djokovic said about Carlos Alcaraz?
“History is on the line for both of us every time we play. The finals of a grand slam, there’s a lot at stake. But it’s no different from any other big match that I play.
Advertisement
“My preparation is as it should be, and I won against him last year here, also in a gruelling match. Let’s see. Let’s see how fresh are we both able to be. He also had a big match, but he has 15, 16 years on me. I think it’s going to be a bit easier for him to recover.
“I look forward to it. Look, I play tennis competitively mainly to be able to reach the finals of grand slams. Here I am, so I cannot complain about anything.
“I’m just trying to enjoy the moment that I’m experiencing tonight. I’ll think about finals later, but for me, this is win that almost equals winning a grand slam.”
Adam Carruthers, 33, was sentenced to four years and three months for causing criminal damage to the famous tree beside Hadrian’s Wall, Northumberland, when he was jailed in July last year alongside Daniel Graham.
Mrs Justice Lambert told the pair they would serve 40% of the sentence behind bars, with the remainder being served on licence in the community.
PA understands Carruthers has been released under the Home Detention Curfew Scheme, as first reported by ITV News Tyne Tees, which said the decision was taken by the governor of the prison where he was serving his sentence, after a risk assessment.
Advertisement
Tyne Tees spoke to him off camera at a Cumbria turf business where he used to work. He told the broadcaster he was happy to be out of prison.
In a statement issued to PA, a Ministry of Justice spokesman said: “Anyone released into Home Detention Curfew faces strict licence conditions and must be tagged. Those who break the rules can be returned to prison.”
It is understood that prisoners must have 12 months or less to serve before their conditional release to be eligible for the Home Detention Curfew Scheme and must be risk-assessed.
They are subject to strict licence conditions and the curfew is enforced with an electronic tag and they must stay at their registered home address.
Advertisement
Former friends Graham and Carruthers were convicted of criminal damage to the much-loved tree, which had stood for more than 100 years.
They were also convicted of criminal damage to Hadrian’s Wall, which happened when the tree fell on the ancient monument in September 2023.
During their trial, Newcastle Crown Court heard the two engaged in a “moronic mission” to cut down the landmark, travelling for more than 40 minutes from their homes in Cumbria, then carrying their equipment across pitch-black moorland during a storm in September 2023.
They took a wedge from the tree as a trophy that has never been recovered, and revelled in the media coverage as news of the vandalism caused national and international headlines.
Advertisement
Mrs Justice Lambert was sure that Carruthers cut the tree down while Graham drove him there and filmed it on his phone.
The tree was a symbol of Northumberland and featured in the Kevin Costner and Morgan Freeman film Robin Hood: Prince Of Thieves. Its destruction took less than three minutes.
Another dangerous free-kick for Arsenal as Morita clips Madueke, with this one even closer to the edge of the area.
The England winger clips in the cross, but Silva catches it easily enough.
Chris Wilson15 April 2026 20:26
Advertisement
Arsenal 0-0 Sporting
The first dangerous free-kick of the day as Goncalves catches Eze near the area.
It’ll be Rice to take – he passes to Eze but he sees a shot blocked.
And all of a sudden there’s a Sporting counter on! Arsenal committed all their men forward and Geny had the freedom of the pitch as he raced into the Arsenal half, but Martinelli did well to track back and dispossess him.
Advertisement
Chris Wilson15 April 2026 20:23
Arsenal 0-0 Sporting
Half-chances at both ends! Gyokeres has his first pop at goal as he finds himself in space near the edge of the box, but this effort is well wide.
Chris Wilson15 April 2026 20:20
Advertisement
Arsenal 0-0 Sporting
And now an opening for Trincao as Hjulmand intercepts Saliba’s pass and ships it on to the Sporting forward.
He tries to bend one into the far corner but it flies wide of the far post! A warning for Arsenal.
Chris Wilson15 April 2026 20:20
Advertisement
Arsenal 0-0 Sporting
First sight of goal for Luis Suarez as Hjulmand slips him in after a great run, but the striker blasts wide at a tight angle.
He’d strayed offside anyway.
(AP)
Chris Wilson15 April 2026 20:18
Advertisement
Arsenal 0-0 Sporting
Sporting have declined to push too high at the moment as they look to keep Arsenal at arm’s length.
The visitors have shown they can play out well from the back but unsurprisingly the attacks are stalling against the home defence.
Chris Wilson15 April 2026 20:17
Advertisement
Arsenal 0-0 Sporting
It’s not been a hugely entertaining opening to this one, with plenty of the game being played at a pedestrian pace.
Both sets of wingers are looking to inject some pace into it, but Geny is the latest to fail to do so as Hincapie shepherds him off the ball.
Chris Wilson15 April 2026 20:14
Advertisement
‘Some fans fearing the worst’
The latest thoughts of Will Castle, who is in place at the Emirates this evening…
“When Real Madrid visited at this stage last year, there was an atmosphere of real belief and optimism, that this Arsenal team can go on to beat anyone and do anything.
“Tonight, there is more than a tinge of anxiety in the air; some are no longer dreaming of the best but fearing the worst.”
Advertisement
Will Castle at the Emirates15 April 2026 20:12
Arsenal 0-0 Sporting
A little glimpse of what Sporting can do in midfield as Goncalves releases Trincao well, though it comes to nothing and Saliba eventually clears.
Chris Wilson15 April 2026 20:11
Advertisement
Arsenal 0-0 Sporting
82 per cent possession for the hosts in the opening stages, in fact. It’s been a little pedestrian so far though.
Madueke and Eze try and inject some pace into it but the chance ends as Hincapie’s shot is blocked, before Quaresma does well to stay with Martinelli at the expense of a corner.
Planning request from Leech Weir Residents Association seeks approval for tree felling works at to the north of Meldrum Mains, a site partially covered by a TPO.
North Lanarkshire Council has been asked to consent to the felling of trees in Glenmavis, despite a tree preservation order.
Advertisement
A planning request from Leech Weir Residents Association seeks approval for tree felling works at to the north of Meldrum Mains, a site partially covered by a TPO.
Supporting the application is a report from a tree consultant which explains they were commissioned to assess the trees for risk and nuisance, with this having been done in 2023 as well as April 2026.
The report notes that although the southern area of woodland is registered as “ancient”, meaning it has been present since at least 1750 and is considered irreplaceable, other sections of the woods do not share this status, due to some trees having been felled and replaced, usually with non-native species and these areas could be restored.
The survey recorded 41 trees as being of concern or requiring work, including 29 close to houses on Glenwell Street which were recorded in line with a request from the residents’ association.
Advertisement
For further information on this application, or to leave comment for consideration, visit the council’s website and search for planning reference 26/00422/TPO.
As the number one importer of Iranian oil, China has a major problem with any constriction of exports in the Gulf – including the US blockade of Iran’s ports, which began on Monday.
Beijing has condemned the US blockade, calling it “irresponsible and dangerous”.
It has also reportedly sought to play peacemaker in the conflict, steering its ally Iran towards talks with the US in Pakistan last weekend.
But the blockade creates a serious political, economic, and possibly military risk that both the US and China will want to avoid.
Advertisement
The BBC’s security correspondent Frank Gardner explains why China’s role in the conflict is too big to be ignored.
Staff at the BBC were told about the redundancies during a company-wide meeting on Wednesday afternoon
The BBC has revealed its largest workforce reduction in almost 15 years, confirming it will axe 2,000 jobs as part of sweeping cost-cutting measures.
The broadcaster is targeting a 10% reduction in running costs over the coming three years in response to what bosses have called “substantial financial pressures”.
Staff were told about the redundancies during a company-wide meeting at 3pm on Wednesday. For the biggest stories in Wales first sign up to our daily newsletter here.
While the magnitude of the cuts is now confirmed insiders suggest that exact information about which departments or roles will bear the brunt of job losses remains under wraps, reports the Manchester Evening News.
Advertisement
It also remains unclear how BBC Wales will be affected by the redundancies.
The announcement arrives at a pivotal moment for the organisation following the departure of outgoing director general Tim Davie on April 2 after a spell marked by considerable internal and external challenges.
Acting director-General Rhodri Talfan Davies is currently overseeing operations before former Google executive Matt Brittin formally takes the role on May 18. The huge reduction in headcount is seen as a significant overhaul in preparation for Mr Brittin’s appointment.
The cost-cutting drive has already started to affect prominent programming.
The BBC recently disclosed that its specialist unit covering significant national events, including royal occasions and state funerals, will be reduced to a single full-time employee with the corporation depending on freelance staff to bridge the shortfall.
This comes after an announcement at the start of last year that 130 roles would be axed from the BBC World Service in order to save £6m during the following financial year.
Advertisement
The broadcaster continues to face a challenging struggle for audiences as streaming giants such as Netflix and Disney+ command the market.
While the annual licence fee – the BBC’s main funding stream – increased to £180 on April 1 the corporation remains under significant political and public scrutiny to prove it offers value for money.
A special episode of the ITV soap has been dedicated to raising awareness of domestic abuse after Todd spoke of his experience
Coronation Street stars have explained the use of the colour purple in a special episode of the long-running show dedicated to raising awareness of domestic abuse.
Advertisement
There were difficult to watch scenes in the ITV soap on Wednesday (April 15) night as a bloodied and bruised Todd Grimshaw headed to the police station to report his husband, Theo Silverton, after he subjected him to a horrific beating after months of both mental and physical abuse.
Corrie fans thought things had come to a head when the pair split last month. But Theo didn’t make things easy for Todd as he launched his latest games, and the pair ended up reconciling, with the break-up just another part of Theo’s manipulation tactics.
Click here to sign up for more Coronation Street updates in our newsletter
After that, things took another shocking turn when they ended up married days later, after Theo sprung a surprise wedding on Todd. Backed into a corner, Todd felt like he had no choice but to say ‘I Do’ and the news didn’t sit well with his loved ones who have become aware of just a small portion of what Todd has been subject to.
Advertisement
But with Todd terrified, he’s only backed Theo more, and was seen agreeing to leave with him for a new life in Belfast. In Wednesday’s (April 15) episode of Corrie, specially dedicated to the abuse storyline, Todd was seen getting his injuries documented at the police station when he locked eyes with another domestic abuse victim. It stopped him in his tracks as she appeared horrified by what she could see.
Todd was then heard telling Kit and DS Lisa Swain the true extent of what he’s been facing at the hands of Theo. He told them about the secret camera footage he’d collated to prove what was going on. He also mentioned that the late Billy Mayhew was the only one aware of the cameras, and that they’d attempted to leave Debbie Webster’s wedding early so that they could come up with an escape plan.
Theo found them, and joined them for the journey back to Weatherfield. Disaster struck when the minibus was caught up in a horrific crash which claimed the vicar’s life – after Theo intervened and stopped him escaping the vehicle before it went up in flames.
While Todd was giving his statement, back on the street, Gary Windass cornered Theo and threatened him with a wrench. With Gary making it clear that no one would know if he were to attack him, Theo followed his orders and climbed into the van, and the pair made their way to the police station where Lisa was later seen questioning the abuser, after Kit was seen arresting him for ABH and false imprisonment.
After trying to push the blame onto Todd, Theo was held for the night in custody by Lisa. Meanwhile, Sarah took Todd to the hospital, where he collapsed outside the building and was rushed to be helped by paramedics waiting nearby.
As this was going on, Lisa was heard discussing domestic abuse with her colleague, PC Jess Heywood, with a number of scenes showing its impact on a series of extras that were featured throughout the episode, all of which had a flyer for a domestic violence survivors’ support group, in the colour purple.
Earlier in the episode, Tyrone Dobbs, wearing a purple hoodie, was seen taking the news about Todd difficult following his own experience of domestic abuse. It was all part of a wider initiative by Corrie to highlight domestic abuse awareness, which accompanies a new video created by ITV Pictures and ITV Digital
The actors featured in the poignant video, which is now available on YouTube, play both well-known Corrie characters and guest artists and are all seen either dressed in an item of purple clothing or featuring a purple accessory, as part of a collaboration with the show’s design team as purple is the colour used globally to represent domestic violence awareness, seen as a symbol of peace, courage, survival, and dedication to ending abuse.
Both the video and episode serve to remind people of the saddening reality of how many people suffer from domestic violence, both men and women, at the hands of their partners, with sadly many cases still going unreported.
Gareth, who plays Todd, shared how important it has felt to work on the episode. He said: “So many domestic abuse survivors have shared their experiences with us throughout this storyline, and weaving those voices into this episode, through the use of colour, felt like a powerful reminder of how widespread stories like Todd’s are.
“I haven’t seen the finished episode yet, but the moment Todd first locks eyes with another survivor in the police station was particularly raw and cathartic to film. It’s been a tough watch at times, and I think the story team – especially writer Debbie Oates and Director Gary Williams – approached this episode with both care and innovation.”
Harriet Bibby, who plays Summer, also recently said of the episode: “I think it is a really powerful episode. Debbie Oates, who wrote it, did a fantastic job because it really does tune you into the reality of things like this, you think it’s few and far between but sadly it isn’t.
“We notice throughout the episode Todd isn’t alone in this, we use the colour purple throughout the episode to signify other people who may have been in an abusive relationship in the past but are maybe in a stronger position now, having come out the other side of it. If you tune into that during the episode, I think it is really powerful, seeing those people alongside Todd’s journey as well.”
The testimony from Russell Vought jump-starts the White House’s push to increase defense spending to nearly $1.5 trillion in the next budget year, up from nearly $1 trillion this year, while cutting health research, heating assistance and scores of other domestic programs by about 10% overall. Such cuts do not cover mandatory spending, which includes such programs as Social Security and Medicare.
The debate over Trump’s proposal underscored the sharp divide that will shape some of the most significant policy debates going into a midterm election that will give voters the ultimate say on the direction of the country.
“For the industrial base to double or triple and build more facilities, not just add shifts, it requires multiyear agreements to purchase into the future,” Vought told lawmakers. “That cost has to be booked in this first year.”
Advertisement
The White House is calling for about $1.1 trillion for defense through the regular appropriations process, which typically requires support from both parties for approval. An additional $350 billion would come through a separate bill that Republicans can accomplish on their own, through party-line majority votes.
Rep. Brendan Boyle of Pennsylvania, the ranking Democratic member of the committee, said he believes in a strong national defense. But he said the idea of increasing defense by more than 40% while cutting programs that people need shows that the Republican administration’s priorities are “out of whack.”
The committee chairman, Rep. Jodey Arrington predicted the hearing would be more “amped up” than usual, and that proved to be true, beginning with his opening statement focused on criticizing Democrat Joe Biden’s presidency. Arrington, R-Texas, said he did not know of any president in his lifetime who “inherited such a complete and utter mess as President Trump did in January of last year.”
Since then, Arrington said, Trump has secured the border, cut taxes and constrained nondefense spending.
Advertisement
It was the beginning of several back-and-forths at the hearing.
“You know how bad this economy is when we hear Joe Biden being invoked, we hear trans people being invoked. I was waiting for Jimmy Carter to be blamed next,” Boyle said in response to Arrington’s opening remarks.
Boyle said consumer confidence is plummeting under Trump and noted a gas station he passed in Philadelphia recently was selling gas at $4.11 a gallon versus less than $3 a gallon some six weeks ago because of Trump’s “war of choice in Iran.”
Rep. Becca Balint, D-Vt., called the proposed defense spending increase shocking.
Advertisement
“We’ve never in the history of this country seen spending like this, paid for by slashing health care, education and housing,” Balint said. “Mr. Vought, yes or no, is $350 billion for the war in Iran lowering costs for Americans?”
“It is certainly not defunding child care. We fully fund child care in this budget,” Vought said, not directly answering the question.
Balint went on to incorporate Trump’s “America First” mantra in her questioning.
She said $350 billion could pay for an enhanced health insurance tax credit for 10 years and that her constituents are asking how the country can continue to spend money on wars and not find a solution to helping people afford health care.
Advertisement
Vought said the president has made clear he was not going to let Iran have a nuclear weapons, missiles and a navy that affect U.S. national security.
“He is doing what is necessary to keep us safe, while at the same time trying to pursue diplomacy so that we can get out of wars and lower those costs over time,” Vought said.
Vought said it was unclear how much the administration would seek to fund the war during the current budget year, which ends Sept. 30. That money would be part of an emergency supplemental spending bill and would be on top of the funds the White House is seeking to boost defense spending next year.
“Would it be more than $50 billion?” asked Rep. Veronica Escobar, D-Texas.
Advertisement
“We’re still working on it,” Vought said. “I don’t have a ballpark for you.”
Two U.S. families went to Italy’s highest court Tuesday to challenge the scope of a year-old law passed by Giorgia Meloni’s government limiting citizenship claims to Italian descendants removed by more than two generations.
Their lawyer, Marco Mellone, argued before the Cassation Court that the law should apply only to people born after it took effect, potentially opening a pathway to citizenship for millions of people living in the United States and parts of Latin America. Another lawyer represented Italian descendants from Venezuela.
A decision by an expanded panel, which makes the ruling binding in lower courts, is expected in the coming weeks.
A decree by the conservative government in March 2025 put the brakes on previous rules allowing anyone who could prove ancestry after Italy’s formation in 1861 to seek citizenship. Italy’s constitutional court last month ruled the new law is valid, but Mellone said the supreme court has the power to clarify the scope of the law.
Advertisement
“The families involved in this case are simply descendants … from an Italian ancestor who emigrated in the late 19th century to the United States, like millions of other people, of other Italians,’’ Mellone said before the hearing. “Today they are invoking their right to Italian citizenship.”
Italian lawyers Marco Mellone and Graziella Cerulli arrive at Italy’s highest Court of Cassation, in Rome, Tuesday, April 14, 2026, to argue against the new citizenship law that restricts citizenship by descent (AP)
Mellone’s case would clarify the citizenship rights of the descendants of some 14 million Italians who emigrated between 1877 and 1914, according to Foreign Ministry statistics, and beyond.
While Mellone’s case involves two families, another dozen people whose citizenship claims were stopped by the law were present outside the courthouse in solidarity.
Karen Bonadio said she hopes one day to move to Italy on the strength of her ancestry. She brought photos of her as a young girl alongside her Italian-born great-grandparents, who emigrated from Basilicata in southern Italy to upstate New York, along with their birth certificates.
“The new law says, ‘all these great-grandchildren didn’t know their great-grandparents.’ This is from 1963, I think I was 3 ½,’’ she said, showing the photograph.
Advertisement
At least one of Mellone’s cases had been rejected in lower courts before the new law, hinging partially on rulings that Italian emigrants who took on another citizenship before having children cannot pass on Italian citizenship.
Jennifer Daley’s case has been working its way through the Italian bureaucracy for nearly a decade. Her grandfather, Giuseppe Dalfollo, immigrated to the U.S. in 1912 from the northern province of Trento when it was under Austro-Hungarian control. He later married an Italian woman and brought her over, and at some point became a naturalized U.S. citizen.
Daley said she always had a strong Italian identity that transcended her last name anglicized by U.S. immigration officials. She petitioned for citizenship because “it is truly a recognition of who I am, where I am from. It’s so much more than citizenship. It’s everything,” Daley, a historian, said by phone from Salina, Kansas.
Outside the courthouse, Alexis Traino said great-grandparents on both her maternal and paternal sides had come from Italy, where she now lives, mainly in Florence.
Advertisement
“My entire life, I grew up knowing — and my parents always emphasized — that I was Italian. I had a very, very strong connection with Italy,” said Traino, 34, who was waiting for documents from Italy and the U.S. when the law passed, blocking her case.
“I want to be Italian. I want to contribute to Italy and be a citizen,’’ she said.
Murray will be remembered for his razor-sharp volleying skills and the preposterous angles he conjured at the net. His returns were often unorthodox and he was fond of a lobbed service return to unsettle opponents.
Alongside his triumphs, Murray has been a staunch defender of doubles players and frequently demanded they be shown more respect.
“Doubles has its place in the game – it’s not the golden ticket that singles is, but it’s undervalued by the tour,” Murray told BBC Sport.
“As these events go longer and longer they need content, and doubles supports that.”
Advertisement
Murray said he was proud to have represented his hometown of Dunblane and the country of Scotland at the highest level.
“There is no history of tennis and no environment of tennis [in Scotland],” Murray told BBC Sport.
“I’d imagine the odds were against us from the start but we were able to make some good things happen.”
His mother Judy thought Jamie had the better hand-eye co-ordination of her sons when young. Jamie and Andy briefly became rivals as tennis players – and also while wrestling.
Advertisement
Judy once recalled: “Andy’s favourite [wrestler] was The Rock and Jamie’s was Stone Cold Steve Austin, and they used to create these bouts that they saw on the television. They used to wrestle each other on the duvet and thump each other with pillows, and create these belts and make up their own rules and scoring systems.”
Jamie is 15 months older than Andy, and as his early dominance on the tennis court started to fade Andy says he quite literally bore the brunt.
“We were coming back from Solihull in the minibus and I’d beaten Jamie in the final, I think, of the under-12s, so basically I was winding him up about that and my hand was on the hand rest,” he said in 2015.
“We were sitting next to each other and he just basically punched me on the hand – I lost my fingernail and I’ve still got the scars to show for it.”
Advertisement
Despite some defeats against Andy, Jamie was still very much on track for a professional singles career until a negative experience at an LTA training school in Cambridge in his very early teens.
He struggled with living away from home and the elite training environment, and even though he has never sought to blame the LTA, his forehand suffered and he has said he was never quite the same player again.
“The existence and contents of his suspected martyrdom note, along with his possession of two knives, and material downloaded from his mobile phone, demonstrate his intention to use violence against people inside the Israeli embassy and sacrifice his own life in the process – to die, in his words, ‘for the glory of God’.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login