Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Politics

Teenage girl sexually harassed by adult ‘influencer’ at Unite the Kingdom rally

Published

on

EDobbin, shirtless with tattos along both arms (left) in his car speaking. He harrassed a teenage girl, 15, at a recent rally. Meanwhile, the second image shows Tommy Robinson (right) walking, wearing a suit

EDobbin, shirtless with tattos along both arms (left) in his car speaking. He harrassed a teenage girl, 15, at a recent rally. Meanwhile, the second image shows Tommy Robinson (right) walking, wearing a suit

A disturbing video from Tommy Robinson’s Unite the Kingdom rally in London has shown a grown man sexually harassing a teenage girl in front of her mother.

Advertisement

The video above was filmed at the Unite the Kingdom rally last weekend. As the Canary reported, the rally was a hotbed of racism. On a positive note, however, it attracted fewer than half as many people as the 2025 event did. Let’s get that down to zero in 2027.

Teenage girl ogled by grown men

At the start of the video, ‘influencer’ EDobbin greets a trio of men in Union Jack suits before putting his arm around a passing child and describing her as “my little girlfriend”. After asking what her name is, the teenage girl’s mother said:

She ain’t no child bride.

When asked how old the girl is, the mother clearly answered “15”. Whoever captioned the video wrote “16”, which is the legal age of consent in the UK.

Suggesting that EDobbin definitely heard “15”, he responded:

Advertisement

Fucking hell. How old are you really? Please, I’m going to go to jail in a minute.

After the mother and daughter walked away, EDobbin followed behind, shouting at the teenage girl:

Excuse me, my love. Can I get your details and see you?

The mother responded:

Absolutely not.

EDobbin wasn’t deterred and disgustingly replied:

Oh, mum. Mum, look at that.

By “that”, he meant the child he was sexually harassing — something he made clear by gesturing towards the teenage girl with his hand.

Advertisement

He then said:

Fucking hell. You need a warning sign on you.

The girl’s mother responded again:

She’s got a mother, that’s enough.

EDobbin yelled back:

No, you’re too happy to be a barking one. Woof.

The mother and child were still walking away as this happened, clearly showing they wanted nothing to do with the freak.

Advertisement

Who is EDobbin?

The loathsome harasser in the video is EDobbin, a man from Rochdale who displays the following information on his Instagram page:

🕵🏻‍♂️ – Truth seeker
🐲 – Mud Fossil student
🌎 – Flat Earth, Psalms 19:1
🧭 – Mindset Architect
🏘 – Property Landlord
🦾– Level 3 PT

‘Mud Fossil students’ are people who believe that mountains are the fossilised remains of dragons. This is odd, certainly, but not as bad as him being a landlord.

For one reason or another, he’s had multiple social media accounts banned:

@edobbin_real_one♬ original sound – EDobbin_Real_One

He’s currently touring gyms around the UK because he was banned from the JD Sports in Rochdale because it’s “the Year of the Horse”.

Advertisement
@e_dobbin.live E dobbin KICKED OUT OF JD GYM #edobbin #gym #clip #fyp #meta ♬ original sound – E Dobbin Clips 🌍

As laughable as he is, what he’s doing in the video is a million miles away from funny. Being somewhat peculiar is no justification for behaving like an out-and-out paedophile, which is precisely what he did at the rally.

Predictable behaviour from Robinson allies

Of course, this sort of behaviour shouldn’t come as a surprise from an attendee of the Unite the Kingdom rally. Tommy Robinson and his lackeys like to present themselves as defenders of women, but the reality is a million miles away.

For instance, Robinson (real name Stephen Yaxley-Lennon) is friends with the alleged trafficker and rapist, Andrew Tate. He also ran defence for Tate when right-wing commentator Lauren Southern accused him of raping her.

As Hope not Hate reported:

Lennon has consistently ignored or even defended occurrences of [sexual exploitation] in his own ranks, proving that he is more concerned with attacking Muslims than actually combatting CSE or challenging sexual violence.

Notoriously, in June 2010 Lennon’s close friend and ally Richard Price was convicted of making four indecent images of children, and possessing cocaine and crack cocaine. The vile images were found on his computer by police after he was arrested for disturbances at an EDL demonstration.

Advertisement

Far from condemning Price’s crimes, the EDL launched a campaign for his release. Lennon himself wholeheartedly supported Price, claiming he had been “stitched up” and that “Price has no idea how they were on his computer.” When Lennon’s claims became untenable, he switched positions and finally condemned him.

In other words, EDobbin is exactly the sort of degenerate you’d expect to find among these people.

Featured image via social media/ Leon Neal/ Getty Images

By Willem Moore

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

Now they’re censoring Reform’s policy announcements

Published

on

Now they’re censoring Reform’s policy announcements

We warned them. Zia Yusuf warned them. Anyone with a functioning understanding of how corporate compliance works in the face of punitive state regulation warned them. And now here we are.

TikTok has removed a video posted by Reform UK’s home-affairs spokesman, Zia Yusuf, in which he set out the party’s new immigration policy. It is an entirely legal, mainstream argument about the consequences of mass migration and the failure of successive governments to control it. The platform’s justification for blocking the video was ‘hate speech’ and ‘hateful behaviour’. The removal was triggered by a report made under the Online Safety Act.

Let that settle for a moment. A senior British politician, who is effectively shadow home secretary of the unofficial opposition, has had his political speech – policy announcement, not abuse or incitement – deleted from a major platform under legislation this government told us was about protecting children from pornography. Yusuf was also warned that further violations could result in his removal from TikTok altogether.

Advertisement

To be clear, this was not TikTok acting on its own instincts. Failing to comply with the Online Safety Act’s requirements can incur fines of up to £18million or 10 per cent of a firm’s global annual turnover, whichever is greater. When the penalty for inaction is that large, corporations do not sit and deliberate the merits of each complaint. They reach for delete. They err, always, on the side of caution – which is to say, on the side of whoever filed the report. GB News presenter Tom Harwood put it simply and correctly: regulation of this kind has a deadening effect on liberties, not because it commands censorship directly, but because it creates an incentive for corporations to censor first and think later. Companies do not need to knock on the door when it has already made the cost of opening it prohibitive.

Yusuf had predicted precisely this. Speaking last year, he pointed to section 179 of the Online Safety Act, which makes it illegal to say something false that causes ‘non-trivial psychological harm’, and warned that this would force social-media companies to ‘proactively censor’ speech. ‘It’s going to create an incentive structure for social-media companies to over-censor’, he said, ‘because that’s the rational thing to do’. He was right. He is now the living proof.

There is a rich and nauseating irony here that should be stated plainly. Yusuf noted that TikTok, which has just removed his immigration-policy video on the grounds that it is hate speech, happily hosts videos calling for the assassination of Nigel Farage. Fayaz Khan, an illegal immigrant from Afghanistan who threatened Farage’s life, stood before a camera in October 2024 and announced his murderous intentions on TikTok. While that video remained up (although Khan was jailed for five years in October for the threat), a video on Reform’s migration policy was taken down. You could not construct a clearer demonstration of where the algorithm’s political sympathies lie – or rather, where its risk calculations land.

Advertisement

Enjoying spiked?

Why not make an instant, one-off donation?

We are funded by you. Thank you!

Advertisement




Advertisement

Please wait…

Advertisement

Then there is the parallel case of Katie Lam. Last year, shortly after the Online Safety Act came into force, the Tory MP gave a speech in the House of Commons criticising Labour’s response to the grooming-gang crisis. While not removed altogether, the speech was age-restricted on X under the same legislation. Words spoken under the protection of parliamentary privilege, in the mother of all parliaments, were deemed unsuitable for general viewing. We have arrived somewhere genuinely dystopian.

Yusuf told me: ‘This is exactly what we said would happen as the law targets social-media companies in a punitive fashion.’ He is right. And the political class that passed this legislation in 2023 – with cross-party support, let it be remembered, the Conservatives as guilty as Labour – knew or should have known what its results would be. Section 44 allows the culture secretary to unilaterally force Ofcom to change the rules about what social-media companies must censor without an act of parliament, without a vote. A single minister, in private, can redraw the boundaries of acceptable political speech. That is not about ‘safety’ online. That is power without accountability, dressed in the language of child protection.

Advertisement

This is the precautionary principle in its most corrosive form, our worst European inheritance, transplanted into British law and handed to Whitehall to enforce. In medicine, in environmental regulation, in financial compliance, we have watched this principle devour common sense for 30 years. When in doubt, prohibit. When the cost of action is lower than the cost of inaction, act. The corporations have done their maths. They will keep doing it.

The Online Safety Act must be repealed. Not reformed, not adjusted at the margins, not reviewed after a suitable period. Repealed. What was sold as a shield for children has become a sword in the hands of whoever holds office. That was always the risk. It has now become the reality.

Advertisement

We said so. Now you have seen it.

Gawain Towler is a commentator and an elected board member of Reform UK.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Three-time Trump Voter Reveals Why He Regrets Supporting President In C-SPAN Call

Published

on

Three-time Trump Voter Reveals Why He Regrets Supporting President In C-SPAN Call

A longtime Donald Trump supporter called in to C-SPAN on Saturday to lay out his buyer’s remorse over the president.

“Now I understand how somebody like Adolf Hitler was able to brainwash millions of people,” the caller told host Taylor Popielarz on C-SPAN’s “Washington Journal.”

“I never I thought I’d see that again in my lifetime. But it’s happened, right? I thought we got past that, but we don’t learn from history.” (Check out his call in the clip below.)

The caller — who was identified as a three-time Trump voter named “Thomas” from Hawaii — began his message with, “It’s hard for me to say this, but I think if I can open up about it in public that it might help others.”

Advertisement

He said he wanted to believe Trump was “the real deal” although he had doubts as he “knew enough about his business history to think otherwise.”

“But now I regret my support for him, and I should’ve known better,” Thomas explained.

“He’s making it plain as day. He’s a con man, a liar, doesn’t keep his promises. He’s in office all for himself, and he doesn’t even try to hide his corruption anymore.”

He continued: “So unless you get all your information from what I call the ‘right-wing propaganda-for-profit, disinformation media industrial complex,’ he’s the worst president we’ve ever had, and he’s the most corrupt president we’ve ever had.”

Advertisement

Thomas said it was “hard” and took him “a while” to express such a sentiment, suggesting it was difficult due to his commitment to believing Trump.

He explained he considered third-party candidates and voting for a Democrat before sticking with Trump in the end.

Thomas, when asked whether there was a “straw that broke the camel’s back,” said it wasn’t just one thing that caused him to split with the president.

“It has been a cumulative process, and it’s gotten so blatant now,” he explained.

Advertisement

“He [said he was] going to lower prices on day one, he was going to do this on day one, only he could fix all this stuff.”

Thomas emphasised that Americans ought to slow down Trump by holding him accountable and voting for “as many Democrats, whether you like ’em or not, just to get some balance back into our system of checks and balances.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

This Cookware Brand Is Dishwasher-Safe (And Gordon Ramsay-Approved)

Published

on

This Cookware Brand Is Dishwasher-Safe (And Gordon Ramsay-Approved)

We hope you love the products we recommend! All of them were independently selected by our editors. Just so you know, HuffPost UK may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page if you decide to shop from them. Oh, and FYI — prices are accurate and items in stock as of time of publication.

Not to sound dramatic, but the bane of my existence is my expensive pans constantly getting scratched, and thus everything I cook sticking to them.

And before you ask – no, I don’t use metal tools on them, or put them in the dishwasher. I don’t know what I’m doing wrong, but it’s something.

Understandably (I hope) that means when the time comes to buy a new pan, I’m always on the look out for one that won’t leave me screaming silently into my sink as I try to scrub scraps of egg away.

Advertisement

As an avid cook, I use a pan every day; sometimes multiple times a day – meaning I’m after a pan that won’t scratch, works on an induction hob, and is easy to clean.

Trust me, I’ve been through so many, I’ve earned the title of pan slut. But, ladies and gentlemen, I’m thrilled to say I have finally found a pan that won’t fail me.

Co-owned by Gordon Ramsay, Hexclad is designed by chefs for chefs. Using some kind of magic beyond my scientific understanding, each of its many varieties of pans uses a hybrid of stainless steel and non-stick technology.

I’m not ashamed to say that I’ve never checked out so quickly. Its 30cm Hybrid Pan (with a lid) was really calling to me, not least because it’s an ideal size for everything from cooking eggs, to a perfectly golden fillet of fish, or even a tangy Thai curry.

When it finally arrived on my doorstep, it didn’t disappoint. Thanks to those laser-etched hexagons on the base, the pan has a perfectly smooth bottom that heats up completely evenly.

Advertisement

The result is an even surface that browns, sears, and (joy of joys) releases in equal measures.

And, because Hexclad knows how to check all my boxes, it’s also induction hob and oven friendly (up to 480 celsius), can be chucked in the dishwasher when you’re done with it, and is chemical-free.

You might be thinking, okay, stop with all the pan PDA. Sorry, not sorry. I simply don’t care, because any true home chef will know that the right cookware makes the difference between an excellent meal and a flop on a plate.

It’s not just a plain old frying pan, either. Hexclad has saucepans, frying pans, and roasting tins for every eventuality; it even has a pizza steel and the smartest chopping board I’ve ever seen.

Advertisement

Okay, enough of my waxing lyrical. If you, too are looking for The Pan that will upgrade your cooking game from 0 to 100, here’s my round up of the best on Hexclad right now.

A baby version of my go-to, which is a great size for eggs, or a meal for one.

If you can’t summon up the smell of burnt milk in your mind at a moment’s notice, congrats: you’re winning at life. No prizes for guessing that it’s awful. But this pan wouldn’t do that to you! It’s non-stick, and just the right size for heating milk or making a hot choccy.

If you’re never sure whether to go for your wok or frying pan, allow me (or Hexclad) to introduce a hybrief pan – what a concept!

Wed to a wok? Don’t worry, Hexclad has you covered. You can even choose to get it with a lid, or not. Pretty sweet.

Allora, we all know the struggle of choosing the right sized pan for pasta. We see this coming in handy for your next alla Norma, or even for simmering a chilli con carne.

Who doesn’t want a pan that can do it all? Roast a chicken, check. Make a soup? Check. We could keep going…

If you’re more bound to your oven than your hob, you’ll be pleased to know HexClad also layers its technology into this frankly huge roasting pan.

Don’t think one will be enough? Go for a bundle, like this set that saves £70 on two sizes of its signature pan.

As a pancake pro, I can reassure you that a griddle is truly the best implement to get a good flip going. This one will also be great for fajita night, or your next cheese toastie (elite, IMO).

Hosting season is nigh, so you better brush up on your pizza-making skills. This steel will help you get the base of dreams, while remaining plenty light, so you don’t strain your wrists.

The moment you get excited about a chopping board is when you realise you’re truly an adult. Seriously, though, how cool is this? On one side, it’s a carving board for meat, but flip it around and you’ve got a practical smooth surface and stainless steel tray for all your offcuts. I’m fangirling so hard right now.

Just as important as a good pan is an excellent knife. I can’t think of a day when I haven’t used a paring knife, and this one made from Japanese steel is truly the best of the best.

I dare you to tell me this chef’s knife isn’t a thing of beauty. Right, you can’t, because it’s forged by a mind-blowing 67 layers of steel, and reinforced by that gorgeous forest green handle. Delightful.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Brits actually return stolen Ethiopian colonial artefacts in shock move

Published

on

colonial artefacts pilfered by Brits return home to Ethiopia

colonial artefacts pilfered by Brits return home to Ethiopia

The sticky-fingered Brits have actually returned stolen colonial artefacts pilfered during one of its African wars. The Ethiopian heirlooms had been held in a British Army regimental museum. And, like countless other stolen artefacts, they’d been floating around British heritage sites since being pinched in 1868. The news has reignited the debate surrounding colonial artefacts unjustifiably held in British institutions.

The repatriation of colonial artefacts

A slightly miffed Daily Telegraph reported that:

Emperor Tewodros II died in a battle with British forces in 1868, after which soldiers under Gen Sir Robert Napier looted sacred and secular treasures from the hilltop fortress of Magdala, in what was then Abyssinia.

They further explained that:

To avoid capture, the emperor took his own life with his pistol, a weapon said to have been given to him by Queen Victoria. Soldiers of the now-defunct King’s Own Royal Regiment took as trophies a braid of his hair and a scrap of shirt stained with his blood.

Commenting on the repatriation of these items, the head of the Ethiopia Heritage Authority Abebaw Ayalew Gella said:

Advertisement

We hope that this generous example will inspire other museums to follow suit in the near future, and that further repatriation and collaboration can be negotiated with other museums in the United Kingdom.

Sure, we agree, but we’re not holding our breath about seeing many more colonial artefacts returned anytime soon.

The Telegraph also reported that:

Among the loot were royal artefacts, which have a spiritual significance given the close connections between Ethiopia’s former Christian royalty and the Orthodox Church, and sacred tablets known as “tabots”.

The paper said that the Royal Engineers Museum, the Royal Artillery Museum, and Royal Scots Dragoon Guards all continue to hold colonial artefacts, which were pilfered during the same war.

Colonial reckoning long overdue

Another British Army regiment is under pressure to give back items it stole from what is modern-day Ghana. As the Canary reported on 25 February, the Royal Artillery has various items from its sackings (yes, they did it twice) of the kingdom of the Asante capital, Kumasi, including significant colonial artefacts.

Advertisement

London’s Victoria and Albert Museum agreed to repatriate colonial artefacts it held in 2024. But the Royal Artillery are still holding out on a golden ram’s head looted during a colonial butcher-and-bolt mission. This is just one example of numerous colonial artefacts still awaiting restitution.

Author Barnaby Phillips told the Guardian that he believed:

the Royal Artillery may be “embarrassed” by a stand that was commissioned for the ram’s head in 1875, as it depicts three black boys in loincloths, as if holding the object aloft, while its base is engraved with words commemorating the battles and capture of the city.

Bizarrely, the army blocked him on “security grounds.” Phillips said:

Advertisement

It’s an army institution holding the spoils of war, but they say it’s not safe to show it to me. That’s somewhat ironic.

He explained the regimental secretary’s rejection letter was “curt and categorical”:

The regiment was ‘unable to agree’ to my request to see its Asante gold ram’s head, held in the officers’ mess room at their barracks in Larkhill … ‘It has long been our policy, primarily on security grounds, not to allow public access to items held in the regiment’s private collection,’ wrote the secretary. He clarified that it was for insurance reasons.”

Empire was a criminal heist

Ghana is currently pushing to have the head returned. Hopefully, some movement on the Ethiopian artefacts will help that case progress. But even these are just a drop in the pond, considering the thousands of colonial artefacts spread across our museums. A 2025 Oxfam report calculated that between 1765 and 1900 the empire stole USD 64.82 trillion worth of wealth from India alone.

Arguably, this stands out as one of the most audacious heists in modern history — the plundering of colonial artefacts was central to wealth extraction by the British empire.

As the National reported at the time: This included extensive lists of colonial artefacts dispersed throughout British collections.

Advertisement

a significant number of the richest people in the UK can trace their family wealth back to slavery and colonialism, specifically the compensation paid to rich enslavers when slavery was abolished.

Oxfam also emphasised that:

This must be reversed. Reparations must be made to those who were brutally enslaved and colonised. Our modern-day colonial economic system must be made radically more equal to end poverty. The cost should be borne by the richest people who benefit the most.

There is a good history lesson in this all for flag-waving empire nostalgists who thronged London’s streets this weekend at fascist Tommy Robinson’s ‘Unite The Kingdom’ march.

The fact remains — Britain still needs a full reckoning with its colonial history if it’s ever going to get over itself. That includes a proper accounting of the vast crimes of empire and the colonial artefacts still held by Britain.

Featured image via Leon Neal/Getty Images

Advertisement

By Joe Glenton

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Christians against the Far Right set up ‘listening table’ for UTK marchers

Published

on

Christians at a 'listening table'

Christians at a 'listening table'

As thousands of Tommy Robinson fans gathered in central London on Saturday 16 May, Red Letter Christians, Better Story and Christians Against The Far Right set up a ‘listening table’ to speak to marchers leaving central London following the Unite The Kingdom rally.

There were two ‘listening stations’. One for those who attended the Unite the Kingdom rally and the other for those who may have felt unsafe as a result of the march.

The Baptist ministers and Anglican priests in attendance, who are against the co-option of Christianity by the Far Right, say more polarisation isn’t the answer. Instead, they say, we need to listen and understand before we can share our different perspectives.

Bishop Anderson Jeremiah said:

Advertisement

One of the major concerns of people participating in this rally is that they are not being listened to. I feel that both as a priest and as a bishop, the most important thing I have to do is to listen and to hear their pain.

As a church we have a duty of care to pay attention and be present in the community rather than waiting in our churches.

Tommy Sharpe, co-founder of Better Story, said:

Across the country, we’ve got far more that unites us than divides us. We all want billionaires to be made to contribute more to our communities. We’re all angry about the way big business rips us off.

We set up listening stations today to try and find those areas of common ground that unite us.

Rev Sally Mann, Baptist minister and co-director of Red Letter Christians, said:

Advertisement

We are here listening today because we believe that London needs peace envoys. We are creating a listening space for those who took part in the protest, and those who got caught up in it today.

We are praying for the peace of our city. And we’re confident witnesses to the Way of Jesus – a way of love and welcome, not division and fear.

East London priest Rev Rachel Summers said:

As Christians we are all on a journey of faith, to discover more what it means to love God and to love one another. Today we are here to be with those who have taken part in the protest, and to listen to them, and to be with those who’ve been caught up in it.

We are here as Christians to remind one another of our walk in faith of love, a perfect love that casts out fear.

Featured image via Better Story

Advertisement

By The Canary

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

US and UK hollow out commitment to preventing civilian war casualties

Published

on

war casualties

war casualties

The US and UK have gradually hollowed out any commitment to preventing or recording civilian casualties in their wars. In the latest sign of imperial decay, the Pentagon has quietly shut down a program meant to prevent civilian deaths. The UK, as ever, are following suit.

The Guardian reported on 15 May:

A report released by the department’s inspector general concluded the US military no longer has the people, tools or infrastructure needed to comply with two federal statutes requiring it to maintain a functioning civilian casualty policy, and operate a Civilian Protection Center of Excellence (CP CoE).

The full report can be read in full here.

A similar process has been underway in the UK. As the Canary reported on 6 May:

Advertisement

The UK military has no way of detecting civilian casualties in war, a new study shows. And even processes developed during the failed occupation in Iraq and Afghanistan have now been virtually abandoned.

War casualties further abandoned

The NGO Ceasefire said the UK military’s own internal review:

reveals that adequate systems to track, investigate and respond to civilian harm either do not currently exist in the UK, have fallen into disuse, are not built for modern warfare, and/or are not scalable for future wars.

This revelation comes shortly after it was announced that the UK’s Conflict and Security Monitoring Project for tracking civilian casualties in Gaza had been shuttered.

Hard-right US war secretary Pete Hegseth has made it clear he thinks the laws of war and rules of engagement are ‘woke’.

As Human Rights Watch (HRW) reported:

Advertisement

[Hegseth] commented at a news conference on March 2, 2026, about “stupid rules of engagement,” suggesting that they may interfere with “fight[ing] to win.”

Drift into open barbarism

The Intercept’s Nick Turse has reported that in Iran, Yemen, Africa, and the Caribbean there have already been serious issues with casualty reporting. This appears to be due to severe cuts to the Pentagon’s Civilian Harm Mitigation and Response Action Plan, or CHMR‑AP.

As the Pentagon has starved the CHMR enterprise, the U.S. has killed more than 2,000 civilians across the world — from Latin America to Africa to the Middle East — during Trump’s second term.

UK NGO Action on Armed Violence (AOAV) said on 16 May:

For years, Britain and America have claimed that their militaries wage war ethically and with accuracy. Words like precision weapons, legal oversight and sophisticated targeting procedures were bandied around and, to be frank, they were done so with a sense of exceptionalism.

Adding:

They were meant to be the waging of ‘civilised war’ and they distinguished Western democracies from the indiscriminate violence they condemn in others. But two recent developments suggest that such a moral high-ground – for all of its fragility and questionable claim – is no longer being so brazenly claimed.

Needless to say ‘civilised war’ has still proven to have plenty of scope for massive violence and large-scale civilian deaths. The US and UK way of war – and the ‘liberal’ pretensions which ride with it – is shifting. From the war on terror, through Gaza, and now in Iran and elsewhere, accelerating imperial decay has pulled the humanitarian mask off – likely for good.

Advertisement

Featured image via Getty Images/Tim Boyle

By Joe Glenton

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Should it be a crime to mock the burqa?

Published

on

Should it be a crime to mock the burqa?

The post Should it be a crime to mock the burqa? appeared first on spiked.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Gaza-bound flotilla vessels seized by Israel, SOS calls go unanswered

Published

on

Israel seizes Gaza-bound flotilla vessels

Israel seizes Gaza-bound flotilla vessels

Israel’s genocidal military has seized multiple humanitarian vessels that were en route to Gaza as part of the Global Sumud Flotilla.

The first reports came in this morning, 18 May 2026. At the time of writing, the Global Sumud Flotilla’s social media account has posted one notification after another with footage of Israel’s illegal attacks and details of the volunteer crews. Each post comes with a maritime distress message, “SOS.”

Marus

Hunin

Al Khalasa

Ajjur

Tabariyya

Qazaza

Yazur

Dayr Tarif

Shatila

Kyriakos X, Tenaz

Al Qastal

And footage from various boardings was compiled into a single post:

Israel is a terror state. The UK and other western governments have citizens among the humanitarian volunteer crews, yet continue to remain silent. Including Keir Starmer, who has found time to post on X about golf, but not about Israel’s crimes against international and maritime law:

Featured image via the Canary

By Skwawkbox

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Israel attacks Global Sumud Flotilla yet again

Published

on

Global Sumud Flotilla boats sailing at twilight

Global Sumud Flotilla boats sailing at twilight

For the second time since the Global Sumud Flotilla launched last month, it has been illegally intercepted and boarded in international waters by Israeli forces. Of the 14 UK delegates, eight, at the time of publication, are confirmed as having been abducted. Their whereabouts and wellbeing are currently unknown.

At 8am BST on Monday 18 May, the Flotilla was 250 nautical miles from Gaza and roughly 75 nautical miles southwest of Cyprus when reports of interception began to come in.

Interceptions began with ribs (small military speedboats) approaching Flotilla vessels, followed by heavily armed Israeli soldiers forcing their way aboard. Communications were then invariably lost as Israeli soldiers smashed cameras and participants tossed their phones into the water.

This comes after a similar attack on Wednesday 29 April, less than three weeks ago, where 180 peaceful delegates were abducted and tortured. Two, Saif Abukeshek and Thiago Avila, were taken to Israel and subjected to brutal and inhumane treatment.

Advertisement

After the extreme brutality of the previous attack we are deeply concerned for all Flotilla participants and demand the UK government and governments worldwide defend their citizens and condemn the Israeli regime’s illegal and shameful actions.

The Global Sumud Flotilla is a peaceful, non-violent response to the illegal Israeli siege on Gaza. The boats are carrying life-saving aid, including food, medicine, and children’s toys. The UK government must demand the release of abducted participants and facilitate the safe arrival of the Flotilla in Gaza.

A Flotilla spokesperson said:

The Israeli regime thinks it can intimidate us into giving up on our Palestinian cousins. But the resilience of the Palestinian people will never be broken, therefore our determination to reach them will never be broken.

We will break the siege, we will end the genocide, we will free Palestine.

Advertisement

ICJP speaks out for Global Sumud Flotilla

The International Centre of Justice for Palestinians (ICJP) also condemned the interception. It called the action:

Yet another egregious violation of international law and a total disregard for the law of the sea.

The interception and unlawful detention of non-violent humanitarian activists, which included armed Israeli commandos climbing on to several boats, is an act of illegal piracy intended to maintain Israel’s genocidal and unlawful siege on Gaza.

The normalisation of the occupation and Israel’s total disregard for international law is a threat to everyone. At least eight UK citizens have reportedly been intercepted, including:

  • Esme Nickerson.
  • Hasnain Jafer.
  • Peter William Henderson.
  • Richard Johan Anderson.
  • Hugh Stuart Stirling.
  • Cerie Bullivant.
  • Dáša Raimanová.
  • Veronica Otero Guillen.

Israel’s recent detention of the flotilla’s leaders, Spanish national Saif Abu Keshek and Brazilian national Thiago Ávila, who were allegedly tortured and abused in Israeli detention, was yet another example in the long list of Israel’s acts of impunity that deliberately maintain its genocide in Gaza and brutal apartheid across occupied Palestine.

The Global Sumud Flotilla’s humanitarian missions have become a necessary act in the face of deliberate Israeli restrictions on the import of aid, critical spare parts, back-up generators and other equipment to Gaza. The UN says such missions are being continually undermined by Israel’s policies.

Advertisement

Whilst Israel has intercepted the flotilla multiple times, some of the ships remain on their mission to deliver aid.

Órlaith Roe, ICJP’s public affairs and communications officer, said:

How many times must we say it – Israel’s interception and detention of humanitarian aid flotillas and their activists headed to Gaza is a total unlawful, illegal, and egregious violation of international laws.

The lack of any kind of meaningful response from international governments, whose citizens are continually detained and abused by Israeli forces who illegally board the boats in international waters, is astounding.

It is hard not to ignore the blatantly obvious double standards when it comes to humanitarian missions intended for Palestinians suffering under Israeli occupation, and those of other conflicts.

Advertisement

Featured image via the Global Sumud Flotilla

By The Canary

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Reform launch campaign to keep Starmer in office

Published

on

Nigel Farage and Keir Starmer

Nigel Farage and Keir Starmer

Reform UK has spent a considerable amount of time arguing that we need to get Keir Starmer out of office. Now, there’s a very real chance this could happen – specifically via the challenge from Andy Burnham. Because politics is a strange game, however, Reform is now doing everything it can to stop Burnham from winning – hence the party’s new campaign:

In other words, Reform is campaigning to keep Starmer in power.

Starmer in!

The first thing to note about the above is that Burnham and the suitcase seem to be on different horizontal planes. This is a nitpick, we know, but it does suggest Reform has hired a particularly lazy graphic designer (that or all the good ones refused to work with the party).

Getting to the important stuff, you’ll notice the suitcase lists all the places in which Burnham was rumoured to be running – specifically:

Advertisement
  • Norwich South.
  • Rusholme.
  • Makerfield.

We know Burnham was rumoured to run in these constituencies because we closely follow politics; your average voter, however, will have zero idea what this is referencing. There’s also an easy comeback, because the following is the list of the constituencies where Farage ran to be an MP:

  • Eastleigh (1994).
  • Salisbury (1997).
  • Bexhill and Battle (2001).
  • South Thanet (2005).
  • Bromley and Chislehurst (2006).
  • Buckingham (2010)
  • South Thanet again (2015).
  • Clacton (2024).

And Farage really doesn’t like it when you point out that he lost in seven of these areas:

It’s ‘did you know Burnham was rumoured to run in Rusholme‘ versus ‘Farage has lost in more constituencies than a stinkbug has legs‘.

Advertisement

Given this, you might say Farage is the worst person in the world to be making this argument. And the same is true of Reform’s other campaign ad, which is that Burnham will run ‘anywhere’:

Advertisement

Funnily enough, there are eight segments on that wheel, which means you could literally assign one to each of the races Farage ran in.

Weak sauce

This all seems like fairly timid stuff from Reform. Early rumours suggested the party would focus on Burnham having previously voiced support for rejoining the EU. This would make sense, because the Makerfield constituency voted overwhelmingly to leave. The fact that Reform hasn’t jumped two-feet in on this suggests the party no longer thinks Brexit is the make-or-break issue it once was:

There are good reasons to criticise Burnham that Reform is ignoring. He’s already said Labour shouldn’t pursue proportional representation in this parliament, and there’s reason to suspect he wouldn’t pursue full re-nationalisation. Reform won’t pull him up here, however, because Farage & co. are all Thatcherite privatisation fetishists who want the scam to continue.

Featured image via Getty Images (Dan Kitwood) / Getty Images (WPA Pool)

By Willem Moore

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025