The Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) of Estonia has partially suspended the operating license of BB Trade Estonia OÜ, the entity behind the Zondacrypto cryptocurrency platform. In its formal statement, the FIU said the company is now barred from accepting deposits and onboarding new clients, while existing users may still withdraw funds. The move signals intensified regulatory scrutiny of Zondacrypto across Europe as authorities scrutinize compliance practices and consumer protections within the crypto exchanges that have migrated or registered in the Baltic state.

The regulator’s notice also sets a 30-day window for BB Trade Estonia OÜ to bring its operations into alignment with applicable legal requirements. “If it fails to do so, the law obliges the FIU to revoke the operating license,” the FIU stated. The authority did not disclose the specific compliance breaches that prompted the suspension, and Cointelegraph contacted the FIU for comment but did not receive a response at the time of publication.

Key takeaways

• The Estonian FIU partially suspends BB Trade Estonia OÜ’s operating license, barring deposits and new onboarding while allowing withdrawals for existing users.
• A 30-day window is imposed to reach full compliance, with potential license revocation if requirements are not satisfied.
• The regulator did not specify the breaches; authorities and media outlets will be watching for concrete remediation steps and enforcement actions.
• The development compounds existing regulatory scrutiny of Zondacrypto in Europe, including MiCA-related concerns raised by Estonian authorities earlier in 2024.
• BB Trade Estonia OÜ has ties to Zondacrypto’s broader cross-border presence, with the company registered in Estonia since 2019, according to InfoRegister data.

Regulatory action in Estonia and implications for BB Trade Estonia OÜ

Estonia’s FIU has invoked supervisory powers to curb certain activities by BB Trade Estonia OÜ as part of a broader effort to tighten oversight over crypto service providers within the EU’s MiCA framework. By blocking new deposits and client onboarding, the regulator aims to curb potential consumer risk while evaluating whether the firm meets ongoing licensing requirements. The 30-day compliance deadline places the onus on the operator to demonstrate robust AML/KYC controls, proper governance, and other regulatory obligations demanded under Estonian law and EU standards.

Officials did not detail the underlying deficiencies in public statements, and the absence of a publicly disclosed breach list creates uncertainty for stakeholders. The move comes amid a wider debate about how EU crypto licensing is implemented in member states and how cross-border entities adapt to MiCA’s harmonized standards. Estonia’s authorities have emphasized a path toward formal compliance rather than immediate sanctions, but the possibility of license revocation remains a material risk for BB Trade Estonia OÜ and its Zondacrypto platform.

BB Trade Estonia OÜ’s status is also notable in light of its corporate history. The Estonia-based entity has been listed as the operating arm of Zondacrypto, a platform with roots in Poland as BitBay, established in 2014. Its registration in Estonia since September 2019—well before the full rollout of MiCA—positions the business squarely within EU regulatory reach, as authorities seek consistent supervision across borders.

Zondacrypto at the center of regulatory debate in Europe

The partial suspension in Estonia adds to a broader web of regulatory considerations surrounding Zondacrypto in Europe. Reports surrounding withdrawal difficulties at Zondacrypto have drawn scrutiny from policymakers and regulators, including public commentary by Polish officials referencing potential losses and the scale of exposure in crypto-related incidents. In parallel, Zondacrypto has faced MiCA-related warnings from Estonia’s Financial Supervision and Resolution Authority (FSA) over the listing of the exchange’s “TeamPL” token without a white paper, which the authorities flagged as a MiCA compliance issue.

Market activity around Zondacrypto has appeared subdued in recent data, with CoinGecko noting limited trading activity on the exchange around the time of the regulatory action. Media coverage and regulatory filings continue to shape the narrative around the exchange’s operational viability and governance.

As part of the wider regulatory discourse, Zondacrypto’s governance and its cross-border footprint have become points of focus for enforcement and policy analysis. The Polish dimension—where discussions of potential links to Russian capital and political influence have surfaced—highlights how national risk perceptions can intersect with EU-wide licensing and oversight. In parallel, Estonia has taken steps to operationalize MiCA within its financial sector, as evidenced by other notable regulatory actions like the licensing of LHV Pank under the EU crypto framework. Estonia’s FSA granted LHV Pank a MiCA license, marking a milestone for one of the country’s largest banks and signaling the incremental integration of traditional financial institutions into the EU’s crypto regulatory regime.

BB Trade Estonia OÜ’s MiCA-related challenges and the ongoing Zondacrypto narrative illustrate how cross-border entities navigate diverse regulatory expectations. The Estonian and Polish regimes reflect a broader European push toward standardized oversight to bolster consumer protections, licensing discipline, and AML/KYC compliance in the crypto ecosystem. Regulators are balancing market access with risk mitigation, a dynamic that will shape licensing decisions, enforcement priorities, and the pace of institutional participation in European crypto markets.

Cross-border licensing and institutional implications

The Estonian regulatory action arrives amid a wider transition in the EU where MiCA is increasingly interpreted and implemented by member states. The 30-day compliance window underscores the immediacy with which regulators seek to impose corrective measures on crypto service providers, emphasizing governance reforms, disclosures, and risk management practices aligned with EU standards. For crypto exchanges, the message is clear: licensing continuity hinges on demonstrable compliance with cross-border rules, consumer protections, and anti-money laundering controls that align with MiCA’s framework.

From an institutional perspective, the development adds to the cost and complexity of maintaining cross-border crypto operations. For banks and payment providers operating within or adjacent to the crypto space, the Estonian example reinforces the importance of robust onboarding controls, transparent token disclosures, and clear operational compliance to preserve access to regulated financial rails. The licensing milestone achieved by LHV Pank in Estonia—under MiCA—illustrates that traditional financial institutions can gain regulatory clearance to participate in crypto services, provided they meet the necessary standards. Such developments may influence other banks and financial firms to pursue MiCA-compliant licensing as a prerequisite for borderless crypto activities.

Finally, the case highlights the practical uncertainties that still surround enforcement scope and interpretation of MiCA in various jurisdictions. While the FIU has outlined a path to remediation, it has not publicly enumerated the exact breaches. This ambiguity can complicate remediation planning for firms facing similar regulatory actions and underscores the need for clarity in how authorities assess and certify ongoing compliance in a rapidly evolving policy environment.

In summary, the Estonian FIU’s partial license suspension of BB Trade Estonia OÜ, paired with ongoing MiCA-related concerns and cross-border regulatory developments, reinforces the imperative for crypto firms to maintain rigorous compliance programs, transparent governance, and resilient operational controls as they navigate Europe’s unified but heterogeneous regulatory landscape.

Closing perspective: While the immediate impact centers on BB Trade Estonia OÜ and Zondacrypto, the action reflects broader regulatory intent to standardize oversight and heighten enforcement in the European crypto ecosystem. The next steps—whether BB Trade Estonia OÜ rectifies gaps or faces revocation—will shape future licensing discourse and the regulatory calculus for cross-border crypto activity in the region.

Polymarket has launched a new category of prediction markets tied to private companies, allowing users to trade on questions related to pre-IPO companies — a move that could bring greater price discovery to private markets, where valuation data is often limited and opaque.

The new offering, announced Tuesday, was developed in partnership with Nasdaq Private Market, a platform that facilitates secondary trading in shares of privately held companies. Nasdaq Private Market will provide the underlying data and market infrastructure for the contracts.

The markets are designed to reflect expectations around events such as fundraising rounds, valuation changes and other corporate milestones involving startups and late-stage private companies. The launch expands Polymarket’s product lineup beyond its core markets focused on politics, macroeconomic events and public companies.

Source: Cointelegraph

The move is part of Polymarket’s effort to broaden its appeal to financially oriented users and extend prediction markets into private capital markets, where pricing information is often less accessible and less transparent than in public equities.

Polymarket said the rise of so-called unicorns — privately held startups valued at $1 billion or more — has increased demand for market-based forecasting tools tied to private companies. The platform noted that there are nearly 1,600 unicorns worldwide with a combined valuation exceeding $5 trillion, despite access to these companies remaining largely limited to private investors.

Related: Jump Trading eyes Kalshi, Polymarket stakes as institutional interest grows: Report

Prediction markets draw growing institutional interest

Polymarket’s partnership with Nasdaq Private Market reflects the broader institutionalization of prediction markets, as private company data and event-based contracts gain traction among professional investors.

Retail traders still account for the vast majority of activity. An April report by Bitget Wallet and Polymarket found that retail traders generated 80% of prediction market volume.

Prediction market trading volume in March. Source: Bitget Wallet

Still, Wall Street analysts say institutional participation is increasing as the US regulatory environment becomes more supportive and market infrastructure improves.

Bernstein recently pointed to the first institutional block trade on Kalshi as a milestone for the sector. Block trades are privately negotiated transactions, typically executed by large investors to move significant positions without disrupting the broader market.

Related: SEC delays prediction market ETFs over mechanics and risk concerns: Report

Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently.

TLDR

• Flare has integrated D’CENT hardware wallets with its XRP yield vault infrastructure.
• The integration allows users to earn XRP yield while maintaining self-custody.
• Users can access yield products without creating new wallets or managing new chains.
• Flare uses FAssets to convert XRP into FXRP for deployment in DeFi strategies.
• Smart Accounts simplify transactions by removing gas fee and chain switching complexity.

---

Flare has connected its yield infrastructure to D’CENT hardware wallets for XRP holders. The update allows users to earn yield while keeping assets in self-custody. The network also introduced the XRP Alliance to unify services for XRP management and earning.

Flare Enables Direct XRP Yield Access Through Hardware Wallets

Flare has integrated its yield system with D’CENT’s biometric hardware wallet platform. As a result, users can access XRP yield vaults without leaving their secure device. The setup removes the need for new wallets or additional blockchain navigation.

The integration allows users to deposit XRP and earn returns directly in XRP. Flare uses its FAssets system to convert XRP into FXRP for DeFi use. At the same time, Smart Accounts simplify gas management and transaction processes.

Flare stated that Smart Accounts reduce friction for new users entering DeFi. The system hides complex steps like gas fees and chain switching. This design supports smoother onboarding for first-time participants.

XRP Alliance Expands Ecosystem Access and Vault Adoption

Flare launched the XRP Alliance alongside the wallet integration. The group connects projects across the XRP Ledger ecosystem. It aims to provide a single interface for managing, swapping, and earning XRP.

The alliance supports users who prefer hardware wallets for security. It brings together services that operate within the XRPL ecosystem. This approach reduces the need for multiple platforms or accounts.

The earnXRP vault serves as the primary product in this rollout. It was developed through a partnership between Flare, Upshift, and Clearstar. The vault reached its 25 million XRP cap within one week.

Flare reported that more than 5,400 users joined the earnXRP vault. Around 98% of these users were new to DeFi platforms. This data highlights early user engagement with the product.

The vault currently offers about 3.4% APY in XRP. Users receive returns without converting their assets into other tokens. Early participants also benefited from waived fees during the first 30 days.

Flare confirmed that users maintain control of their assets during the process. However, the system still relies on smart contracts and DeFi strategies. These elements introduce operational risks tied to the underlying infrastructure.

FAssets convert XRP into FXRP, which interacts with DeFi protocols. This process depends on smart contract execution within the Flare network. Any technical failure could affect asset performance or accessibility.

Flare emphasized that self-custody remains a core feature of the system. Users do not transfer ownership to centralized platforms. Instead, they interact with decentralized infrastructure through their hardware wallet.

The XRP Alliance will continue expanding integrations with XRPL projects. Flare plans to add more tools for asset management and yield strategies. The network has not announced a timeline for future updates.

Bitcoin has cooled from the latest push higher as traders pivot toward liquidity-driven dynamics rather than chasing new all-time highs. Futures and order-book data point to a concentration of buyers around the $68,000–$70,000 zone, suggesting market participants are building and anchoring positions in a corridor that has become the dominant trading focus in recent months.

Analysts tracking on-chain and order-book indicators note the region between $68,000 and $70,000 is now the most densely traded area on the chart since November 2025. The visible range volume profile shows heavy activity in that band, implying many positions were opened or accumulated there over the past several months. Concurrently, the bid-ask ratio has hovered in negative territory, signaling that sellers have been more assertive than buyers as markets hover near liquidation thresholds. A separate liquidation heatmap points to substantial long exposure near $74,700, with the potential for that exposure to rise to around $11 billion if Bitcoin trades toward $70,000 over the next 90 days. Taken together, the data suggests traders are prioritizing deeper liquidity pools and risk management over pressing toward higher levels above $80,000.

Key takeaways

• The $68,000–$70,000 zone remains the most active trading band on the visible range volume profile since November 2025, indicating entrenched liquidity there.
• The bid-ask ratio sits at approximately -0.03, showing selling pressure is currently outpacing aggressive buying as traders position near liquidation levels.
• Liquidation data highlights over $3.4 billion in cumulative long exposure around $74,700, with a potential rise toward $11 billion if BTC weakness extends toward $70,000 within a 90-day window.
• Retail trader sentiment shows a crowded long stance, with Hyblock reporting True Retail Accounts long above 60% and RSI around 74.9, implying a potential for pullbacks if orders unwind.
• Past patterns suggest recoveries have tended to occur when retail long positioning cooled, offering a cautionary frame for the current setup.

Liquidity concentration shapes the near-term outlook

By design, the VRVP (visible range volume profile) highlights where the most trading activity has taken place. In Bitcoin’s current data, the $68,000–$70,000 corridor stands out as the principal hub of activity, signaling that many market participants are comfortable and liquid near these levels rather than chasing fresh highs. This concentration can act as both a magnet and a shield: it provides built-in liquidity for exits but can also cap upside if price action fails to attract new buyers with enough conviction to move beyond the zone.

Long exposure and liquidation risk cluster around key levels

Liquidity risk is not only about where traders want to buy; it’s also about where they are most exposed to losses. CoinGlass’ liquidation heatmap shows a significant cluster of long positions near $74,700, underscoring a vulnerable point if the market reverses. The metric estimates more than $3.4 billion in long exposure at that strike, with the potential to swell toward roughly $11 billion if Bitcoin declines toward $70,000 over a 90-day horizon. For traders, this paints a picture of a market that is heavily concentrated at specific strikes, where liquidations could accelerate if price action tests those levels.

Related market coverage from Cointelegraph notes Bitcoin’s price recently stayed below the $77,000 mark as U.S. bond yields hovered near multi-decade highs, a macro backdrop that can amplify drawdowns when risk-off sentiment surfaces. In this context, the above liquidity and liquidation signals reinforce a scenario where the market’s immediate pulse is governed by risk management and depth of liquidity rather than impulsive upside chasing.

Retail sentiment and the risk of a crowded long regime

Hyblock’s metrics add a behavioral lens to the supply-and-demand picture. The platform tracks the share of retail futures accounts that are long, and its True Retail Accounts long percentage has climbed above 60%. In earlier cycles, such “extreme long” conditions tended to precede short- to mid-term pullbacks, with price momentum cooling after retail positioning became crowded. Hyblock also complements its long-term positioning reads with a relative strength index around 74.9, suggesting that retail traders are aligned with a continued move toward the mid-to-upper $70,000s rather than a breakout toward new highs.

Historically, the most pronounced recoveries have emerged when retail longs contracted—often when fewer than about 35% of retail accounts held long positions—before BTC rebounded from local lows. The latest signal — a long-dominated retail base combined with elevated RSI — implies traders should be mindful of a possible consolidation or correction if the market cannot sustain upside momentum. The latest metrics indicate traders are positioned for prices near the mid-$70,000s, which could leave room for a sharper correction if the macro or liquidity backdrop shifts unfavorably.

In practical terms, the current layout means investors should watch how BTC behaves around the 68k–70k zone and near the major long-exposure thresholds highlighted by the liquidation map. A break below the lower boundary could accelerate selling as liquidations cascade through the concentrated long positions, while a sustained move above the dense supply zone would require fresh buyers to appear in meaningful size to re-energize a new bout of upside.

Readers should stay tuned to how volatility evolves around these pins, and whether retail sentiment shifts as macro catalysts unfold. As with prior cycles, a clear change in the balance of power between liquidity depth and price discovery could redefine the near-term path for Bitcoin.

As a point of context, investors will want to monitor how the market absorbs any macro shifts that influence risk appetite, including yields, liquidity conditions, and funding rates. The evolving interplay between on-chain liquidity hotspots and retail positioning will likely shape BTC’s direction in the weeks ahead.

TLDR

• The CFTC and the DOJ filed a lawsuit against Minnesota shortly after the state approved a ban on prediction markets.
• Federal regulators argue that prediction markets fall under their exclusive jurisdiction as regulated derivatives products.
• The complaint states that Minnesota’s law unlawfully interferes with federally approved trading platforms.
• The state law bans platforms that allow users to bet on events such as sports outcomes and economic trends.
• The statute also extends liability to banks, media firms, and data providers linked to these platforms.

---

Federal regulators moved quickly after Minnesota enacted a law banning prediction markets across the state. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Department of Justice filed a lawsuit within one day. They argue that the state law interferes with federally regulated derivatives markets.

Federal lawsuit challenges Minnesota Authority Over Prediction Markets

The CFTC and DOJ filed the complaint against Minnesota and Governor Tim Walz in federal court. They claim the state law violates the agency’s exclusive jurisdiction over derivatives trading and regulated contracts.

Officials stated that prediction markets operate as federally approved financial instruments under existing law.

The complaint reads, “This flagrant and unprecedented incursion must be preliminarily and permanently enjoined.”

The agencies explained that the law classifies prediction markets as illegal gambling within Minnesota borders. However, federal regulators maintain that these platforms trade event-based contracts under national oversight rules.

They also stressed that exchanges offering these contracts must comply with federal standards. Therefore, the agencies argue that state-level bans disrupt a uniform regulatory system.

State Law Targets Platforms and Related Financial Services

Minnesota’s new statute prohibits platforms that allow users to wager on future events and outcomes. The law covers predictions involving sports, weather, economic indicators, and political developments.

The statute also extends liability to banks, payment processors, and media organizations connected to these platforms. It includes entities that advertise, verify, or supply data used by prediction market operators.

The complaint highlights partnerships between prediction platforms and major organizations. These include sports leagues, media companies, and financial data providers that support market activity.

Regulators argue that penalizing these partners creates broader enforcement risks beyond trading platforms. They maintain that federal law already governs these activities under established financial regulations.

Broader Dispute Expands Across Multiple U.S. States

The lawsuit forms part of a wider conflict between federal regulators and state authorities over market classification. Several states have attempted to restrict prediction platforms using local gambling laws.

The CFTC has taken legal action against states such as Illinois, Arizona, and Connecticut in similar disputes. These cases focus on whether states can override federal authority in regulating derivative products.

Meanwhile, Minnesota has introduced mixed policies toward crypto and related services in recent months. Governor Walz approved legislation allowing banks and credit unions to provide crypto custody services.

Earlier this year, the state also banned crypto ATMs, citing concerns about fraud and scams. The new prediction market ban will take effect on Aug. 1, according to the statute.