Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Politics

The House | Brexit Scars And UK Political Instability Temper Brussels Enthusiasm For EU Reset

Published

on

Brexit Scars And UK Political Instability Temper Brussels Enthusiasm For EU Reset
Brexit Scars And UK Political Instability Temper Brussels Enthusiasm For EU Reset

(ZEN – Zaneta Razaite/Alamy)


6 min read

The European Commission and national leaders can see the benefits of a rapprochement but Brexit scars, unresolved disputes and uncertainty over who will be in No 10 are tempering Brussels’ enthusiasm, finds Christian Spillmann

Advertisement

The reset between the European Union and the United Kingdom was much ado about nothing.

Brexit was a tragedy. The ‘reset’ is a farce. ‘Breturn’ is a fantasy. The language of international relations is rarely so blunt, so unvarnished. Instead, pleasantries and embraces conceal a more awkward truth. The divorce negotiations left a bitter aftertaste on the Continent. Yet the return of Donald Trump to the White House has fractured the global order. His disdain for Europeans, and the consequences of his erratic decisions, have made closing ranks imperative. A rapprochement between the UK and its former EU partners is now vital to Europe’s security. Keir Starmer wishes to go further. The British Prime Minister is seeking a reset of relations, though he has drawn three red lines. The reception has been polite; enthusiasm conspicuously absent. In Brussels, the issue is not a priority, and mistrust among European leaders is real. How much faith can be placed in the contrition of a country that offers its former partners a fresh start while preparing to cast its votes for one of the architects of the rupture?

Brexit shattered the relationship between the UK and its EU partners. Negotiations were arduous, at times bruising, and strained relations among member states. Nowhere is the ambivalence more pronounced than in France. Emmanuel Macron has taken Keir Starmer under his wing. The two leaders have forged a privileged bilateral relationship. The French President is strongly in favour of resetting ties with the UK, and the British Prime Minister has become his interlocutor of choice on European defence. Paris regards London as a strategic partner and is acting accordingly. Macron and Starmer co-chair the ‘coalition of the willing’ for Ukraine and are co-ordinating the mobilisation of a naval mission to secure maritime routes through the Strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea.

Advertisement

Yet the Franco-British relationship is not without strain. Beneath the cordiality lies suspicion. Paris refuses to allow London to enjoy the benefits of the single market without accepting its obligations. The UK has been unable to join Safe, the EU’s flagship rearmament programme, stymied by a European preference championed by France – at least 65 per cent of components must be produced within the bloc – as well as by Starmer’s reluctance to pay the entry price, a financial contribution estimated at between €4bn and €6.5bn. London’s defeat in this stand-off has underscored the difficulty of translating a political ‘reset’ into tangible integration.

All is not lost. Starmer has signalled his intention to negotiate participation in a second round of the Safe programme, should the financial terms become more ‘equitable’. A second EU-UK summit is scheduled for late June in Brussels, with the date yet to be fixed. Progress is expected on migration, with the Commission set to present a ‘Channel Plan’, as the issue has become a European one. But the Continent will press the UK to cease being “so attractive to irregular migrants”, citing its labour market, the absence of identity cards and the pull of community networks, as one European negotiator warned. Advances are also anticipated in aligning carbon markets (ETS), sanitary and phytosanitary measures (SPS), UK participation in the Erasmus programme, and the YES scheme for youth mobility.

These remain incremental steps, albeit useful ones. “We are identifying areas for co-operation. We are operating in the narrow margins between the Trade and Co-operation Agreement and Starmer’s three noes: no return to the single market, no customs union, no freedom of movement,” one negotiator explains.

Advertisement

British officials have revived the idea of rejoining the single market for goods. Representatives of the 27 EU member states have unanimously rejected this notion of a ‘pragmatic Breturn’. It does not hold. The four freedoms are indivisible. British negotiators, their counterparts complain in Brussels, appear at times short of subtlety. “They no longer understand us,” comes the lament.

The reset resembles a diplomatic farce – replete with misdirection, half-truths, misunderstandings, slammed doors and sudden reversals. London seeks to escape its isolation. Continental capitals, confronted with a cooling of relations with Trump’s America, are in search of a reliable partner. Scenes of reconciliation multiply: summits, state dinners, grand declarations, smiles for the cameras.

Yet the misunderstanding endures. London appears to believe that a reset entails regaining the commercial and security advantages of EU membership without paying the full price. On the Continent, there is an expectation that the UK will finally accept EU rules and contribute financially to common projects. The result is predictable: when the moment comes to strike agreements and sign cheques, each side discovers it has been talking past the other. Doors slam, recriminations follow and disappointment prevails. The reset is a diplomatic vaudeville: frequent quarrels, regular reconciliations.

The reset is a diplomatic vaudeville: frequent quarrels, regular reconciliations

Advertisement

For now, the reset has disappointed, constrained by the caution of Starmer and his Labour government. The Continent struggles to discern what, precisely, the British want. Their démarche is driven in part by the UK’s economic difficulties – Brexit has proved deeply damaging – yet the ambition of a reset is curtailed by Starmer’s red lines. The mantra ‘Brexit means Brexit’ has become a straitjacket. The EU has other priorities; in Brussels, the matter is viewed as secondary. 

European commission president Ursula von der Leyen has entrusted it to the commissioner Maroš Šefčovič, tasked with managing and deepening the EU’s global trade partnerships.

The stance that the UK has not abandoned its status as the opt-out state irritates European partners. 

Advertisement

“The British must decide: either we proceed with incremental improvements, or they opt for a broader political debate on rejoining the single market and the customs union,” officials in Brussels argue.

At root lies the question of trust. What are Starmer’s chances of remaining Prime Minister until 2029, given Labour’s heavy losses in the wake of the 7 May electoral bloodbath? The British say they wish to reconnect with the EU, yet Nigel Farage, a leading architect of Brexit and an avowed Eurosceptic, tops voting intentions with his Reform UK party. A paradox – and a nightmare – for the EU.

“The British have paid to discover what Brexit entails,” says an official involved in negotiations with London. “It has plunged the country into a hole. Many now recognise the error and want to end their isolation. Yet a majority appears ready to vote for the man who put them in this predicament.” 

In that contradiction lies the essence of Europe’s bewilderment. 

Advertisement

Christian Spillmann is a former AFP correspondent in Brussels and co-founder of La Matinale Européenne/Il Mattinale Europeo

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

Hayden Panettiere Recalls Oscar Winner Exposing Himself To Her When She Was 19

Published

on

Hayden Panettiere in 2008, around the time of the incident described in her new book

Hayden Panettiere, the star of Nashville, Heroes and the Scream movie franchise, has claimed that a “well-respected” Oscar-winning actor once exposed himself to her at a party.

In an excerpt of her new memoir This Is Me: A Reckoning published by People magazine, Hayden wrote about how when she was 19, she went to an event with a friend.

Making small talk with a group of men made her uncomfortable, she wrote, so she decided to call it a night.

That’s when an “Oscar-winning actor and director” came up to her as she was putting on her coat and pointed down to what he claimed was gum on his pants.

Advertisement

“I looked down and recoiled,” Hayden recalled. “This well-respected, award-winning actor’s testicles were hanging out from his unzipped fly.”

Hayden said the stunt “hadn’t hurt me and I was sure it was a drunken joke, but I’d never seen a grown man do something like that”.

“I was shocked,” she noted.

Hayden Panettiere in 2008, around the time of the incident described in her new book
Hayden Panettiere in 2008, around the time of the incident described in her new book

Hayden also wrote about a sketchy friend who took her to a cabin on a luxury yacht where “a famous thirtysomething British singer-songwriter was lying in a bed” per Entertainment Weekly.

The now-36-year-old claimed: “He was shirtless and propped up on a few pillows with his arms positioned behind his head. From the waist down, he was covered by bedsheets, and I could see the outline of his body underneath.”

Advertisement

She claimed her friend then pulled the sheet away and told her: “I want you to get in bed with him. He has a huge dick.”

“The shock was so great it didn’t even occur to me to say no,” Hayden wrote.

However, she said, she didn’t let things go any further and made arrangements to leave the yacht.

As for the identities of these famous men, the I Love You, Beth Cooper actor wasn’t about to name certain names in her book.

Advertisement

“Things happened a long time ago, but it was to protect me and my company from being sued by some very pissed-off famous people,” she explained to The Hollywood Reporter.

Help and support:

  • Rape Crisis services for women and girls who have been raped or have experienced sexual violence – 0808 802 9999
  • Survivors UK offers support for men and boys – 0203 598 3898

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

BBC Expert Compares Government Price Cap Plan To Venezuela

Published

on

BBC Expert Compares Government Price Cap Plan To Venezuela

A government plan to ask supermarkets to voluntarily cap the prices of certain products to tackle the cost of living crisis has echoes of Venezuela, according to the BBC’s business editor.

Simon Jack said it could even lead to food shortages amid a mounting backlash to the idea.

The Financial Times reported that the Treasury had spoken to supermarkets about offering “incentives” to encourage them to cap the price of essentials like eggs, bread and milk.

That could include easing packaging policies and delaying potentially costly changes to healthy food rules.

Advertisement

On Radio 4′s Today programme, Jack said: “The British Retail Consortium said the history of price controls is not a good one. A lot of people will be forced to potentially sell things at a loss, and when that happens people stop making them.

“If you look back through history, whether it’s the US in the 70s or Venezuela more recently, you can end up with food shortages when you try and impose price controls.”

Economist Paul Johnson said he was “lost for words”.

He posted on X: “Never thought I’d see a British government trying to set food prices. If there is one highly competitive sector it is food retailing.

Advertisement

“Do we really want to live in a country where the state sets these prices?”

Lost for words. Never thought I’d see a British govt trying to set food prices. If there is one highly competitive sector it is food retailing.
Do we really want to live in a country where the state sets these prices?https://t.co/yLqYOdfXNN

— Paul Johnson (@PJTheEconomist) May 19, 2026

But Treasury minister Dan Tomlinson said price controls “isn’t something we’re looking at”.

He told Sky News: “The government is not looking at doing this.

Advertisement

“Instead, what we’re doing is looking across the economy at what are the different ways that we can help households.”

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Makerfield Reform candidate’s fascist links exposed after X account suspended

Published

on

Robert Kenyon, Reform's candidate in the Makerfield by-election, sat at a kitchen counter

Robert Kenyon, Reform's candidate in the Makerfield by-election, sat at a kitchen counter

Robert Kenyon, Reform UK’s candidate in the Makerfield by-election, has had his X account suspended. Shortly afterward, likely reasons why started to surface, particularly his links to a British fascist and his sharing of extremist right-wing content.

Ironically, Kenyon kicked off his campaign by praising his party for supposedly weeding out racists. He also moaned that Reform doesn’t allow him to speak his mind about the Russia-Ukraine war. There was a hint, though, that he disagreed with boss Nigel Farage’s opinion that Russia was provoked into it. The one thing on which Farage has not been wrong — stopped clocks and all that.

Makerfield candidate denies far right exists

Among the found items in Kenyon’s social media history is denialism that the far right even exists. A denial that he made as the far right was engaged in the 2024 race riots.

And as race rioters filled streets, Kenyon claimed that white people are being “assaulted en masse” by Muslims.

Advertisement

Evidenced links to fascists

Kenyon’s links to fascism are disturbing, if unsurprising in an Islamophobic Reform candidate and they’re not being exposed for the first time. Kenyon stood, coming second, in the seat in the 2024 general election.

At that campaign, Searchlight Magazine pointed out his social media links to the leader of the British fascist movement.

And even more recently, Kenyon shared — and contributed to — posts by extremist right-wing Islamophobe and ‘anti-feminist’ Carl Benjamin, who calls himself ‘Sargon of Akkad’. Not just Benjamin, but also white supremacist Peter Imanuelsen, and convicted race-hate instigator Wayne O’Rourke.

Advertisement

But as one commenter pointed out, on far right Elon Musk’s X, that’s not likely to lead to a suspension. It raises the question of what must have been bad enough for his Kenyon’s account to be paused.

As awful as these racist posts are, Lucy is right that they don’t seem enough to be the reason X suspended the account. The suspension hides what else might be there.

But the bigger question, at least as far as the by-election is concerned is this: will enough people in Makerfield care enough to vote against Robert Kenyon again? Or will such presumed and actual views attract enough people in what has become a Reform heartland in a nation plagued by emboldened racists to get him into parliament?

Advertisement

Featured image via X/ reformparty 

By Skwawkbox

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

What Is The Lamp Theory?

Published

on

What Is The Lamp Theory?

Imagine you have met the love of your life and over time, you get married and have children. You have a long, happy 10 years as a family and everything is as it should be.

Then, you look at your living room lamp and it just looks… weird. Still 3D but somehow inverted.

You can’t look away from this lamp. For days on end, you just stare. Your wife is worried, nobody can distract your from this. Then, you realise, thanks to this lamp’s distortion, that your life isn’t real. Your wife, your kids, your home, none of it is real.

This is apparently what happened to Reddit user u/temptotasssoon, who said: “My last semester at a certain college I was assaulted by a football player for walking where he was trying to drive (note he was 325lbs I was 120lbs), while unconscious on the ground I lived a different life.”

Advertisement

He explained that while he was staring at the lamp, it got ‘wider and deeper’ but still with inverted dimensions before he eventually woke back up.

He said: “I heard voices, screams, all kinds of weird noises and I became aware of pain…. a fucking shit ton of pain… the first words I said were “I’m missing teeth” and opened my eyes.

“I was laying on my back on the sidewalk surrounded by people that I didn’t know, lots were freaking out, I was completely confused.”

Following the accident, he was still haunted by the memories he made when he was unconscious.

Advertisement

He said: “I went through about 3 years of horrid depression, I was grieving the loss of my wife and children and dealing with the knowledge that they never existed, I was scared that I was going insane as I would cry myself to sleep hoping I would see her in my dreams.

“I never have, but sometimes I see my son, usually just a glimpse out of my peripheral vision, he is perpetually 5 years old and I can never hear what he says.”

Now, the story has taken off on TikTok with ‘The Lamp Theory’

Now, TikTok has given the story a new lease of life and users are sharing what their dream lives would be before realising the lamp was weird.

Advertisement

Grandma Droniak, a creator with 14 million followers shared her own, saying: “When my parents tell me how proud of me they are because I wanted to be famous since I was a little girl. They always believed in me but then the lamp starts to look weird.”

Another user, Nalle, said: “When I finally don’t feel excluded, I don’t compare myself to others, I actually feel good about myself and I’m not the angry daughter anymore but then the lamp starts to look weird.”

Is the lamp theory possible?

While the Reddit user’s grief may be enough to believe this really happened to them, any skeptics can rest assured that scientists widely agree that we still don’t fully understand consciousness, meaning that we definitely can’t dispute this.

Advertisement

Help and support:

  • Mind, open Monday to Friday, 9am-6pm on 0300 123 3393.
  • Samaritans offers a listening service which is open 24 hours a day, on 116 123 (UK and ROI – this number is FREE to call and will not appear on your phone bill).
  • CALM (the Campaign Against Living Miserably) offer a helpline open 5pm-midnight, 365 days a year, on 0800 58 58 58, and a webchat service.
  • The Mix is a free support service for people under 25. Call 0808 808 4994 or email help@themix.org.uk
  • Rethink Mental Illness offers practical help through its advice line which can be reached on 0808 801 0525 (Monday to Friday 10am-4pm). More info can be found on rethink.org.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Jake Berry Makes Slip Up While Praising Makerfield Candidate

Published

on

Jake Berry Makes Slip Up While Praising Makerfield Candidate

A senior Reform UK figure was left red-faced on live TV after forgetting the name of the party’s candidate in a crucial by-election.

Jake Berry, the former Tory chairman who defected to Nigel Farage’s party last year, made the embarrassing blunder during a painful interview on on BBC Newsnight.

Reform announced on Tuesday that they had chosen local plumber Robert Kenyon to take on Labour’s Andy Burnham in next month’s Makerfield by-election.

But Berry said: “What is extraordinary about this by-election is you have ‘Robert Jenkins’, a brilliant candidate for Reform…”

Advertisement

“That’s not his name, by the way,” presenter Victoria Derbyshire cut in. “It’s Robert Kenyon.”

“Robert Kenyon, I beg your pardon,” Berry replied after an awkward pause.

Jake Berry: “What I think is extraordinary about this by-election, is you have ‘Robert Jenkins’, a brilliant candidate for Reform…”

Victoria Derbyshire: “That’s not his name by the way”

Jake Berry: “Sorry?”

Advertisement

Victoria Derbyshire: “It’s Robert Kenyon”#newsnight pic.twitter.com/3ZIdwbXvLw

— David (@Zero_4) May 19, 2026

Berry also irked presenter Derbyshire as he defended Farage over the £5 million donation he received from crypto billionaire Christopher Harborne, just weeks before he abruptly decided to run for parliament.

Farage initially insisted this money was spent on security, then claimed it was a reward for his years of pro-Brexit campaigning.

Advertisement

The Reform leader later said that he paid for his £1.4 million house from his fees for taking part in the reality show, I’m A Celebrity… Get Me Out Of Here!, rather than the money from Harborne.

Farage is now facing a parliamentary sleaze probe over accusations he failed to properly declare the donation.

Berry sidestepped questions about the issue on Newsnight, instead pointing to the furore around Labour’s current civil war.

Derbyshire said: “So it’s not legitimate for me to be asking you questions about this, is that what you’re saying?”

Advertisement

Berry replied: “It’s stretched credulity to the point of emaciation when we have the very serious story of youth unemployment over 16 –”

“It’s one of many issues, we’re capable of judging many stories over the week,” the Newsnight presenter said.

When Berry attempted to dodge other questions about the donation and start talking about Rishi Sunak’s interest in cryptocurrency, Derbyshire said: “This is deflection on the most obvious scale!”

Victoria Derbyshire, “We asked for an interview with Nigel Farage tonight and we got a thumbs down emoji from his team”

“Over the last couple of weeks we’ve asked for an interview with Nigel Farage or anyone from Reform UK’s front bench ten times”

Advertisement

Jake Berry, who used to be a… pic.twitter.com/l594M6EQ1Q

— Farrukh (@implausibleblog) May 19, 2026

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Claudia Winkleman Reacts To Strictly Come Dancing’s New Hosts Announcement

Published

on

Claudia Winkleman Reacts To Strictly Come Dancing's New Hosts Announcement

After months of speculation, it was confirmed in an Instagram post that TV personality Emma Willis, comedian Josh Widdicombe and former Strictly pro Johannes Radebe would be taking over as the new hosts of the long-running BBC dance show.

Claudia was quick to pop up in the comments, hailing the news as “magnificent”. “What a trio,” she added.

The Bafta winner’s former co-presenter Tess also gave the new team her seal of approval, hailing the new hosts as a “dream team” and an “ultimate trio” she “can’t wait to tune in” and watch live.

Announcing her Strictly exit last year, Claudia said: “I’ve always believed it’s best to leave a party before you’re fully ready to go and I know the new hosts will be magnificent, I look forward to watching them take Strictly to new heights.”

Advertisement

She added: “As for Tess – I’m so so lucky I got to stand next to you. You’re funny, kind, whip smart and a true friend and I love you.”

In a separate joint statement, she and Tess explained: “We were always going to leave together and now feels like the right time.

“We will have the greatest rest of this amazing series and we just want to say an enormous thank you to the BBC and to every single person who works on the show. They’re the most brilliant team and we’ll miss them every day.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Our Survey: Could Conservatives bring themselves to vote tactically or back a pact?

Published

on

Makerfield is the constituency on everyone’s mind. The by-election, set for 18 June, is a fork in the road moment for the Labour government, as it gives the prince over the water – the proclaimed ‘King of the North’ Andy Burnham – a chance to cross over and take the crown. But Reform UK too have it firmly set in their sights, and as one Tory put it to me: “If you could design a model seat for Reform, this is it.”

Yet there is another by-election on the very same day: Aberdeen South, where voters will replace Stephen Flynn, who has swapped Westminster for Holyrood as an SNP MSP. Here the Tories stand a chance at electoral victory after a strong showing during the recent Scottish Parliament elections – and the message from the Conservative Party will be simple: ‘Vote Reform, get the SNP.’

The twin by-elections have unleashed a fresh discourse: should there be some sort of electoral pact with Reform? The option has been floated by two Conservatives – one current MP, one former MP – as a way of consolidating the right and holding back Burnham, whom they regard as disastrous for the economy.

Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg, the former Tory business secretary, suggested to The Telegraph that the parties “work together” as it is a “golden opportunity for the right to unite” and give Labour “a nasty surpise”.

Advertisement

The longest-serving MP, father of the House Sir Edward Leigh, similarly proposed that the Tories not field a candidate in Makerfield, but in return for Reform not standing in Aberdeen South.

If doing some kind of deal means we can win Aberdeenshire and save the Union, it’s worth doing. If in any by-election there are two Right-wing parties fighting each other … there will be Left-wing victory,” he said.

As one Conservative MP on the right of the party told me of the Tories and Reform UK: “Aren’t we all conservatives?”

In terms of numbers, if what you want is an elected representative of the right, then yes it could make sense. Combine Reform’s votes with the Tories in Makerfield at the last general election and you’re just over a thousand votes short of Labour (they got 18,202 to a combined 17,182 of Reform and the Tories), and that is before the Labour government blew up. At the Holyrood elections, where Stephen Flynn stood, he just about scraped through with the SNP on 11,788, the Tories on 10,544, and Reform on 6,113. Again, combine the two and there you would have a unionist representative.

Advertisement

But is that really the answer? It is one thing for members of the public to choose to vote tactically – they can look at the previous results in Makerfield and decide that if they once voted Tory they will vote Reform to secure a win on the right – but it is quite another to impose a reduced choice on them.

And, according to our latest ConservativeHome members survey, it doesn’t seem like the sort of thing that would go down well with Conservative Party members, the majority of whom said that at the local elections they voted for the party they usually support – not tactically. Our survey had 56.7 per cent of respondents supporting that, and only 6.44 per cent saying they voted tactically to either stop another party winning or support the option who stood a better chance. They clearly want the option of their party.

As one shadow cabinet minister told me: “We are a national party and everyone should have the option and ability to vote for a Conservative candidate.”

Both Kemi Badenoch and Conservative Party members can then be reassured that they appear to be on the same page. She has ruled out any deals with Nigel Farage, branding such arrangements as “stitch up nonsense” by political parties “that are too lazy to just get on and select people and win on their own account”.

Advertisement

She added: “We will be standing a candidate at this election. Everybody should compete and the people of the constituency should make their choice about who it is they want to represent them.” Under a month to go until that choice is made.

The post Our Survey: Could Conservatives bring themselves to vote tactically or back a pact? appeared first on Conservative Home.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Kylie Minogue Discloses 2021 Cancer Diagnosis

Published

on

Kylie Minogue Discloses 2021 Cancer Diagnosis

Kylie Minogue has shared that underwent cancer treatment for the second time in 2021.

The Grammy winner opened up about the condition in her new self-titled Netflix documentary, which premiered on the platform on Wednesday.

“My second cancer diagnosis was in early 2021. I was able to keep that to myself,” she explained. “Not like the first time.”

She continued: “Thankfully, I got through it. Again. And all is well.”

Advertisement

Pointing out that “who knows what’s around the corner”, Kylie added that “pop music nurtures me” and that her “passion for music is greater than ever”.

Opening up about why she chose not to share her diagnosis until now, the Can’t Get You Out Of My Head singer said it was something she didn’t feel “obliged to tell the world”.

“And actually I just couldn’t at the time,” she added. “Because I was just a shell of a person. I didn’t want to leave the house again at one point.”

Referring to her musical resurgence in 2023, two years after her diagnosis, Kylie noted: “Padam Padam opened so many doors for me but on the inside I knew that cancer wasn’t just a blip in my life.

Advertisement

“And I really just wanted to say what happened so I can let go of it. I’d sit through interviews and every opportunity I thought, ‘now’s the time’, but I kept it to myself.”

She did, however, address the subject in her music, albeit in a subtle way that passed fans by at the time, on her album track Story, taken from her 2023 release Story.

Kylie recalled: “I needed to have something that marked that time.”

Advertisement

In a press release to promote her Netflix doc, Kylie said she received her second diagnosis after a routine check-up, and said she made the “choice” to disclose her illness in the hopes it could help others.

“There will be someone out there who will benefit from a gentle reminder to do their check ups,” she said. “Early detection was very helpful and I am so grateful to be able to say that I am well today.”

Kylie was first diagnosed with cancer in May 2005, at the age of 36.

At the time, she was in the middle of a headlining tour and had been booked to headline Glastonbury, both of which had to be cancelled while she underwent treatment.

Advertisement

Upon receiving the all-clear, Kylie resumed her world tour, and made a return to pop with her 2007 album X and the documentary White Diamond.

She eventually made a guest appearance at Glastonbury in 2010, during the Scissor Sisters’ performance, and delivered her own triumphant set on the Pyramid Stage in 2019, in the Sunday afternoon “Legends” slot.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Ministers Slammed Over Easing Russian Oil Sanctions

Published

on

Ministers Slammed Over Easing Russian Oil Sanctions

Ministers have been slammed for relaxing sanctions on Russian oil despite the ongoing war in Ukraine.

The government said it would allow the import of jet fuel and diesel refined in third countries amid concerns about potential shortages caused by the war in Iran.

The move flies in the face of a previous government pledge to block Russian oil refined in other countries in order to “further restrict the flow of funds to the Kremlin”.

Tory leader Kemi Badenoch posted on X: “After 18 months of ‘standing up to Putin’, the Labour government quietly issued a licence allowing imports of Russian oil refined in third countries.

Advertisement

“Yesterday Labour MPs voted AGAINST UK oil and gas licences. We are now importing from Russia instead of drilling in the North Sea. Insane.”

After 18 months of “standing up to Putin” the Labour govt quietly issued a licence allowing imports of Russian oil refined in third countries.

Yesterday Labour MPs voted AGAINST UK oil and gas licences.

We are now importing from Russia instead of drilling in the North Sea.… https://t.co/UBOyWRRiEt

— Kemi Badenoch (@KemiBadenoch) May 20, 2026

Advertisement

Prices at the pump have soared since the start of the Iran war, which has led to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a key waterway which previously transported around one-fifth of the global oil supply.

On Tuesday, the RAC said the average price of a litre of petrol at UK forecourts stands at 158.5p, which is the most expensive it has been since December 2022.

In March, energy secretary Ed Miliband insisted the UK government would not copy America’s decision to ease sanctions on Russian oil.

He said: “We’ve not lifted our sanctions against Russia because it is very, very important that we continue to show solidarity with the Ukrainian people.

Advertisement

“This was an illegal invasion launched more than four years ago. Our solidarity with the Ukrainian people has been incredibly important throughout these four years.

“We continue to believe that for the good the UK, we continue to maintain sanctions on Russia. We think it is incredibly important that we send a clear message to Putin on these questions.”

The Treasury has been contacted for comment.

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Donald Trump And Republicans Are Falling Into A Trap

Published

on

Donald Trump And Republicans Are Falling Into A Trap

President Donald Trump has spent much of 2025 and 2026 speedrunning his predecessor’s arc in office: Like Joe Biden, he returned to power with grand ideological goals – but then high prices and a focus on issues he deemed inessential soured the American public on his leadership.

And now, like Biden, Trump has scored a series of election wins, imbuing his party with false confidence. With Biden, those wins came in the 2022 midterms, when Democrats did unexpectedly well and hushed intraparty conversations about whether he should run for re-election. Biden ultimately dropped out far too late, and the Democrats were doomed in 2024.

Trump’s successes in the courtroom and Republican primaries over the past month are having a similar effect, seemingly convincing a party staring at potential doom in November that there is little reason to change course or break with a president whose popularity continues to steadily decline amid a horrendously unpopular decision to attack Iran and widespread discontent over the high cost of living.

But as Trump went on a winning streak in the news, his electoral standing continued to crumble. In the Silver Bulletin polling average, he dropped from -18 at the beginning of the month to -20 on Tuesday – an approval rating that should result in Democrats winning the House, no matter how much the Supreme Courts of Virginia and the United States decide to help the Republicans draw and keep favourable congressional district lines.

Advertisement

Culminating in the ouster of Representative Thomas Massie on Tuesday night, Trump’s winning streak from Indiana to Louisiana to Kentucky was impressive.

A month ago, Republican strategists thought it possible Trump could lose in all three. But it is indicative of both the financial war chest his allies have assembled and of his popularity with the narrow slice of the country casting votes in Republican primaries, not a sign of a broader turnaround with the public.

Within the closed circuit of conservative media and politics, it may be enough to further quiet dissenters. Republicans long ago signalled most of their candidates would stick with Trump most of the time, arguing that only he can bring out a segment of conservative voters who otherwise ignore politics.

“Do not ever doubt President Trump and his political power. Fuck around, find out,” White House communications director Steven Cheung wrote on social media, using the movie tough guy language that is the lingua franca of the Trump administration.

Advertisement

Other Republicans seem to have gotten the message. Representative Mike Lawler, who represents a district Trump lost in all three of his presidential runs and is considered highly vulnerable in November, is set to campaign with Trump on Friday.

“For folks to be able to hear directly from the president on these issues matters, and my district is certainly not just one of the most competitive in the country, but it’s a district that the president moved significantly,” Lawler told the New York Post in announcing the trip, noting Trump improved in his district from 2020 to 2024.

Trump’s confidence is only growing

Emboldened by his victories in Indiana and Louisiana, Trump decided to endorse Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton for Senate on Tuesday, which prompted barely hidden rejoicing among Democrats, who think the ethically-challenged Paxton will put the state in play for Democratic state Representative James Talarico.

Advertisement

Trump’s unpopularity could also help bail Democrats out of some questionable decisions.

On Tuesday night, former Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms cruised to a primary victory in Georgia’s Democratic gubernatorial primary, defeating her closest competition by a 40-point margin. Some Democrats have worried about Bottoms’ viability in November, fretting over possible Republican attacks on her tenure as mayor, which included the chaotic summer of 2020 following the death of George Floyd.

But Republicans have their own issues. Their two candidates who advanced to a runoff, Lieutenant Governor Burt Jones and billionaire Rick Jackson, are far closer to Trump than to popular Republican Governor Brian Kemp in style and temperament.

For her final ad before the primary, Bottoms mocked the dynamic between Jones and Jackson, arguing they were “two grown men fighting to kiss the a** of an a**.”

Advertisement

“It’s embarrassing,” Bottoms declared in the spot. “Unlike some people, I’m not running for governor to be Donald Trump. I’m running for governor to stand up to him.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025